Kavanaugh SCOTUS Thread! Senate Confirms by 50-48 Vote Margin; Kavanaugh Sworn-In

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,320
Reputation
5,840
Daps
93,955
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
many have said the burden is on kavanaugh to prove that this didnt happen...how is that possible?

id rather not have him on the court but thats not how the legal system was designed for good reason

what is the FBI supposed to investigate and how?

this very well may have happened to this lady but idk about all this :yeshrug:
 

Copy Ninja

Superstar
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Messages
8,856
Reputation
629
Daps
31,770
many have said the burden is on kavanaugh to prove that this didnt happen...how is that possible?

id rather not have him on the court but thats not how the legal system was designed for good reason

what is the FBI supposed to investigate and how?

this very well may have happened to this lady but idk about all this :yeshrug:

The FBI is supposed to investigate whether she is telling the truth or not. Someone lying wouldn't want the FBI to investigate. Chances are she is telling the truth. And the fact that this dude has lied and said he didn't do it tells us about his character in the present.

fukk this dude. I hope the Dems do everything they can to stop this guy from being appointed. A lot is at stake.
 

Baka's Weird Case

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2015
Messages
15,743
Reputation
6,831
Daps
76,964
Reppin
Goon Squad - Catset
many have said the burden is on kavanaugh to prove that this didnt happen...how is that possible?

id rather not have him on the court but thats not how the legal system was designed for good reason

what is the FBI supposed to investigate and how?

this very well may have happened to this lady but idk about all this :yeshrug:
the idea of innocent before guilty is nevessary as pertains to criminal charges. but with the question of nomination to the supreme court i dont think we need a burden of proof that high
 

Jhoon

Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
16,518
Reputation
1,510
Daps
37,703
In other words this chick will be wasting her time testifying. Republicans dont care how this makes them look. They are even willing to lose the Senate (even though it will be hard to lose based on who is up for re-election) if it means putting the judges they want in all court levels that can determine law for the next 20 to 30 years.
The court will be expanded.
 

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
25,573
Reputation
8,536
Daps
135,447
Doesn't matter what happened 30 years ago or 3 hours ago, they're going to force Kavanaugh through just like Kavanaugh forced himself on that poor girl.
From the Republican perspective there is a chance they may lose the Senate in November. Brett Kav represents a chance for republicans to reshape the court for several decades. Rape and sexual assault becomes secondary to that goal.
 

Berniewood Hogan

IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
17,983
Reputation
6,869
Daps
88,323
Reppin
nWg
It’s a bit late for anyone not to have figured this out yet, but the skeleton key to understanding American conservatism is this: At bottom, it lacks absolutely any moral or ideological underpinning beyond the reactionary protection of moneyed white men—of their station, their wealth and power, and their egos. Its supposed ideas and abstractions are just a framework for spasmodic lashing-out against anything that can be interpreted as a threat to rich white dudes. It likes supply-side economics because the supply side is made of rich white dudes. It likes tax cuts because the taxes are mostly cut for rich white dudes. It likes cops and soldiers because cops and soldiers uphold a social order with rich white dudes at the top. It likes “traditional family values” because social, economic, and sexual dominion over women are the most traditional family values of all. It likes “Make America Great Again” because rich white dudes used to roll through society and over everyone else with even greater impunity than they do now. All of these things are just proxies for reiterating, over and over and over, forever, the power and security and primacy of rich white dudes.

https://theconcourse.deadspin.com/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-man-the-right-can-get-behind-1829225731
 

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
25,573
Reputation
8,536
Daps
135,447
pretty much...

RG0BS1U.gif


Folks need to stop thinking like normal moral human beings when it comes to Republicans. Even their supposed "moderate" saviors who at the end fall in line 90% of the time.
 

King Static X

The Realest King (የተከበረው ንጉሥ)
Supporter
Joined
Aug 18, 2017
Messages
17,287
Reputation
8,797
Daps
82,835
Reppin
Kings County
I've heard that throw around but based on what?
Some people on the left are suggesting that if/when Democrats take back control of the Presidency and both houses of Congress that the Democrats should "pack" the Supreme Court by adding 2 more justices to counter Trump's justices (Gorsuch and presumably Kavanaugh).

Some people feel that it's the right thing to do. Others feel that it would be a dangerous move and further erode the Supreme Court as a "non-partisan" institution.
 

Jhoon

Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
16,518
Reputation
1,510
Daps
37,703
Some people on the left are suggesting that if/when Democrats take back control of the Presidency and both houses of Congress that the Democrats should "pack" the Supreme Court by adding 2 more justices to counter Trump's justices (Gorsuch and presumably Kavanaugh).

Some people feel that it's the right thing to do. Others feel that it would be a dangerous move and further erode the Supreme Court as a "non-partisan" institution.
Is gorschic partisan?
 
Top