@itsyoung!! you read the above article yet?![]()
nah man I really aint tryna argue with someone who thinks Tom Brady has taken worse hits than Joe Montana and Steve Young
@itsyoung!! you read the above article yet?![]()
nah man I really aint tryna argue with someone who thinks Tom Brady has taken worse hits than Joe Montana and Steve Young
Where do you see me saying he took WORSE hits? You're moving the goalposts now because you realize you don't have a leg to stand on. My argument is that if he's getting hit by bigger and faster athletes over the last 15 years, how wouldn't he be able to survive in the 80s/90s? I'm giving you evidence and common belief of defensive players being bigger and faster now than they were during Montana's era, and Brady has managed to survive for 15 years - how could you possibly make the claim he wouldn't survive back then when all the evidence proves the contrary?
enjoy your day bruh, again im not going back and forth with someone who is even questioning if Brady could survive in the 80s/90s era of football and even said hes been taking hits like Joe Montana, Steve Young, etc were getting hit in the 80s/90s
im coo man - I dont want to argue with that level of ignorance
I won't say that he wouldn't have survived. His career may have ended by now though. They simply let things go back then that would have taken years away from Brady's body.Let's ask some of the more reasonable older heads, since you can't see the sense in my posting -
@feelosofer @NYC Rebel
This dude is saying that Brady would have NEVER survived in the 80s/90s because he's not tough enough to take the hits QBs experienced in that era. Agree or disagree?
![]()
No doubt, but contact like that still happens today - it's just flagged more often. Plus let's not act like during the first half of his career, defenders weren't getting away with similar contact. I mean it isn't like Brady hasn't been hit hard regularly over the last 15 years. I could see an argument if he's only been in the league for five years, with terrycloth running through his veins but he's taken hits like this and still managed to play on -I won't say that he wouldn't have survived. His career may have ended by now though. They simply let things go back then that would have taken years away from Brady's body.
I think back being the only I don't at my cousins naming ceremony rooting for the 59ers when Jim Burt knocked out Joe Montana. That would have been flagged in today's NFL.
No doubt, but contact like that still happens today - it's just flagged more often. Plus let's not act during the first half of his career, defenders weren't getting away with similar contact. I mean it isn't like Brady hasn't been hit hard over the last 15 years. I could see an argument if he's only been in the league for five years, with terrycloth running through his veins but he's taken hits like this and still managed to play on -
Fair enough if one believes his career might be shorter in a previous era, but questioning his inability to play in a previous era because he didn't have the toughness to survive - nah.
What's that got to do with anything?
That just means he wasn't good enough to make the SB in the years he didn't make it. If you make the SB and lose, it's better than not making the SB at all. Same stupid argument is made for Jordan not losing in the Finals.
Let's ask some of the more reasonable older heads, since you can't see the sense in my posting -
@feelosofer @NYC Rebel
This dude is saying that Brady would have NEVER survived in the 80s/90s because he's not tough enough to take the hits QBs experienced in that era. Agree or disagree?
![]()