While I agree with some of his views on emasculation this Harriet Tubman thing isn’t worth dying on. She’s definitely worthy and she earned that.
Last edited:
Harriet Tubman is not more significant than Frederick Douglass, Martin Luther King Jr., or Malcolm X. What's being argued here is valid. Why is it that with every other race men are portrayed as the leaders but with black people now we suddenly are being led by women?
Everyone knows that men should lead the way. If women are leading your group, then you're headed nowhere. This is nothing more than a white agenda to make sure black people always stay second class and never rise up. They know they have to keep black men down to keep us down as a collective. If the men in your race are not even capable of leading their women then how can they lead in anything else.
I'm all for Harriet Tubman on a bill after we get about 2-3 black men on there first.
What yall dont realize is cacs push Harriet Tubman so you can't talk about people like Nat Turner.
No disrespect but i think black men have better things to worry about.
I too find it suspect that she was chosen. That's white people tryna start shyt. What year did that happen? Was it in the middle of the gender wars?
she was a propped up as hero because the white man refused to acknowledge any black males that fought for freedomYall still doing this bw vs bm bullshyt hmm?
Harriet Tubman was not just any black woman... she was Harriet Fukkin Tubman. This shouldn't even be a discussion
Were these responses prompted at all? Cuz i seem to recall an informal poll. Who else was on the list?was driven by thousands of responses we received from Americans young and old.