ThrobbingHood
“I’m Sorry for 2025”
Prostitution is legal in Holland right? Honest mistake.
Josh Kiddey next on that summer jam screen, oh lawd…
- Thread starter High quality poster
- Start date
Avisible Man
S/N: 52093850
For real. It's very easy to look up the laws for each state. California ain't Oklahoma with the age of consent at 16 and the Romeo and Juliet exceptions. If you're over 18 and have sex with someone under 18 in California, you're a statutory rapist.
There is the Reasonable Mistake Of Age Exception – The defendant honestly and reasonably believed that the alleged victim (minor) was at or older than the age of consent (18 years).
But how reasonable is that with this guy who allegedly was outside a club where the age of admittance was almost assuredly 21, which would make him underage for the club. To get into the club, he'd have to lie about his age. And if he is willing to overlook his age when it comes to getting in the club then it stands to reason that he would overlook the age of a female companion from inside or outside said club.
California Statutory Rape Law - California Penal Code Section 261.5
California Statutory Rape Law under Penal Code Section 261.5 Explained in Detail. Learn the definition of the charge along with potential punishments and legal defenses as explained by licensed California Criminal Defense Attorneys.
www.kannlawoffice.com
California is one state in which statutory rape does not apply to married spouses.
In other words, a person cannot be charged with engaging in sexual activity with a minor when the two are married.
And a minor can marry an adult in California with parental consent. And last I checked, Giddey was not married. So I think you're absolutely right with contributing to the delinquency of a minor should the parents have erroneously claimed they gave consent.
Last edited:
fifth column
Superstar
fifth column
Superstar
Very gingerly
SadimirPutin
Superstar
Also what is the age difference between these individuals?
The D-List Vet
Being in a recommendation system.
Nothing going to happen to Giddy since the parents are trying to sweep it under the rug.get em
Wargames
One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
The point is if she wasn’t underage somebody would have said it. The reason why everybody is dancing around this is she is still probably underage and it sounds like the incident happened a while ago.
She is allegedly underage which is why it's being investigated, I'm confused what you're trying to say?
Wargames
One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
That’s the issue. It’s basically did he have sex with her or not. There’s nothing to argue at this point.
The D-List Vet
Being in a recommendation system.
He obvious did have sex with her, but its looking like she not going to come out and say it and her parents are not working with the police.
Who in here is disputing that they didn’t?
Believing it is one thing. Proving it is another especially when the person involved and the family aren’t cooperative.
Wargames
One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
So then here’s the question for everybody. Why the fukk are you defending Josh Giddey? It’s like defending R. Kelly marrying Aliyah because she never filed a police report.
What are your reasonings for feeling he deserves the benefit of the doubt?
Who in here is giving him the benefit of a doubt?So then here’s the question for everybody. Why the fukk are you defending Josh Giddey? It’s like defending R. Kelly marrying Aliyah because she never filed a police report.
What are your reasonings for feeling he deserves the benefit of the doubt?
You’re confusing people saying that he’s potentially going to walk due to them not being cooperative as defending him when that’s not the case at all.
