He sounds like a white Christian conservative version of Popa Wu.
Said that shyt with a straight face too...
He sounds like a white Christian conservative version of Popa Wu.
Great summation of JPSo that benzodiazepine addiction / all-beef diet / month without sleep / horrific drug withdrawal / eight day medically induced coma / month in the ICU / Covid infection really did fry his brain. You can literally see it. It's not just the dumb argument, it's the way you can see him stumbling and reaching to get there. I almost feel sorry for him if he hadn't so clearly brought it all on himself.
Yo the craziest shyt is that he doesn't believe in God, he's fukking agnostic.
This is part of his quest to push "the West" as the savior of all civilization without admitting that he's just pro-white.
HAHAHA (can't use emojis)He sounds like a white Christian conservative version of Popa Wu.
I listend to more of his speech. He isn't wrong because he's talking about Western civilization. You want to understand how we work and think, start with the bible. Cultural relativism 101. What confuses me is he says ethics cannot be derived facts because there are far too many facts in the universe for us to account for (highly debatable but whatever).....therefore objectivity isn't achievable.....wtf has this crackhead been talking about these last 20 years?
Anyways, saying in round about way that religion can be a focus point for soft truths that we can't empirically justify....like Nietzsche said but this time a non believer is actually defending religion. Cocaine is a hell of drug
I feel you, but was there nothing before the Bible in “the west?” Hellenistic philosophy? Greece and Rome is really what’s considered the beginning of western philosophy, and of course it was influenced by the other near eastern civilizations; Sumer, etc. It wasn’t a vacuum and then Christianity.I listend to more of his speech. He isn't wrong because he's talking about Western civilization. You want to understand how we work and think, start with the bible. Cultural relativism 101. What confuses me is he says ethics cannot be derived facts because there are far too many facts in the universe for us to account for (highly debatable but whatever).....therefore objectivity isn't achievable.....wtf has this crackhead been talking about these last 20 years?
Anyways, saying in round about way that religion can be a focus point for soft truths that we can't empirically justify....like Nietzsche said but this time a non believer is actually defending religion. Cocaine is a hell of drug
I feel you, but was there nothing before the Bible in “the west?” Hellenistic philosophy? Greece and Rome is really what’s considered the beginning of western philosophy, and of course it was influenced by the other near eastern civilizations; Sumer, etc. It wasn’t a vacuum and then Christianity.