DaKidFromNoWhere
Superstar
They value dogs more.Being poor and homeless is criminalized in this country.
Sad shyt...
They value dogs more.Being poor and homeless is criminalized in this country.
Threads like this basically sum up the right-wing point of view:
I disagreeIf they let this stand it’s open season on Black males if the public finds you the slight but obnoxious.
I disagree
Sorry but I saw this guy a LOT on the train
He was a raging a$$hole addict and nothing about him was peaceful or humble ..dude wasn't this guy that never hurt anyone and was just asking for food
likely you'd get spit on by him even if you did offer him help.but he was so out of control behaviorwise what you did was just avoid him.so that he wouldn't attack.you or cause you to be pushed in front of a train.
Im.not advocating vigilantism or saying homeless people shouldn't get help ...
But he was absolutely 199 percent the guy who would say some shyt and get some FAFO from someone just as much an a$$hole as he was
Did he physically attack anyone on the train the day he was murdered? If not, then shut the fukk up you lunatic.I disagree
Sorry but I saw this guy a LOT on the train
He was a raging a$$hole addict and nothing about him was peaceful or humble ..dude wasn't this guy that never hurt anyone and was just asking for food
likely you'd get spit on by him even if you did offer him help.but he was so out of control behaviorwise what you did was just avoid him.so that he wouldn't attack.you or cause you to be pushed in front of a train.
Im.not advocating vigilantism or saying homeless people shouldn't get help ...
But he was absolutely 199 percent the guy who would say some shyt and get some FAFO from someone just as much an a$$hole as he was
Thats still not been determined ..Did he physically attack anyone on the train the day he was murdered? If not, then shut the fukk up you lunatic.
Why did I click this shyt :snoop: All of them need to be on the FBI watch list
But you assumed he did.Thats still not been determined ..
There's people on 911 saying he did attack people thats not an assumptionBut you assumed he did.
The issue here is that we must do more to create institutions to help people not be in these predicaments.
That's called a duty to retreat and the issue is that the Prosecutor can't really say that the dude could exercise that duty since the argument that can be made is that on a enclosed train car there was no place to "retreat" eap if dude is "attacking "as far as i understand it, NY law does not allow you to use "unreasonable" amounts of force in response to otherwise nonlethal incidents, so even if we accept that neely was aggressive or even assaulting someone, you have a high hurdle to justify choking him to death.
Except non of this happened. By witnesses accounts he was talking about being hungry, thirsty and tired about not having a job. He said he doesn’t care if he goes to jail.Thats still not been determined ..
There were people who called and said he was physically attacking people ...a person called and said he had a weapon
I'm not sure what planet a lot of the people in this thread live on, but in the real world if a dude runs up on you ( or a woman or old woman ) saying they are gonna fukk you up - they gonna get fukked up in that case - first strike
There's plenty of incidents where homeless people not only act aggressive but then do something aggressive - and once someone is punched so bad they hit their head and die or pushed in front of a trainand die ....everyone is like why didn't someone do something to prevent that person who was obviously about to attack from attacking
Again we cant say how much we want people to intervene when some fukked up shyt is about to happen and then lament when someone does the shyt we say should be done and it LOOKS bad
Dude grabbed him and held him down with two other people ...and notice nothing has been said about them
duty to retreat is not necessary if you are not trying to use deadly force. you can put hands on people if they are attacking. the question is what you do with the hands. when a man is behind someone, casually choking him and being assisted by at least one other man, it is hard to argue that neely is the one making the situation dangerous for the entire amount of minutes he is being choked. at a certain point, even if neely started a fight, he becomes incapable of danger while he is solidly in a choke hold with another man on his arms.That's called a duty to retreat and the issue is that the Prosecutor can't really say that the dude could exercise that duty since the argument that can be made is that on a enclosed train car there was no place to "retreat" eap if dude is "attacking "
AND
that he had the foreknowledge that his action would hurt him - which again you'd have to prove
The assertion from his side is he was JUST holding him