@eastside313, nah I have never seen an episode, but I believe it is somewhat based on the guy whose work I have read, and his division. Girls always that recommend to me, it's probably a little procedural for me.
I was not trying to be coy, or shamelessly promoting that book (The Jon Benet chapter is less then 100 pages, though)....I also realize that those that have a hardline stance on the conspiracy theories, or government nonsense, are unlikely to be convinced by anything else, despite how reasonable or accurate, it may be, so I didn't wan't to launch into some detailed breakdown, grandstanding on everyone....Honestly, if someone with a reasonable open mind, and no bias, researches the case, and some background on child lust murders/pedophilia, they will have their answer.....I just wanted anyone interested to reach the conclusion on their own, when I was young, all I was familiar with was the media coverage, and those tabloids, I used to read while my Mom got her hair done, so I had a bias, I thought the parents did it, but I knew it was somewhat a mystery.... granted I was just 14.
The parents did not, and could not, have committed that crime....and Douglas, is very up front that he was contacted by the Ramsey's, he discusses it at length. however I do not believe he was paid, though I am no 100% on that. Furthermore, the man has investigated, and helped solve dozens of the most vicious crimes, many against children, the most repulsive, disturbing crimes, imaginable..He is not going to look the other way on a child murder for a severance fee. It jus goes against everything available we have to judge his character. See, conspiracy theorists, work on this flawed system where ANYTHING is possible, and the anythings usually depend on the narrative they are constructing....Thats not how criminal investigations work. Data, statistics, science, and human behavior is how they solve cases, I get legit frustrated with the devout conspiracy theorists, I was surprised to see people in here agreeing with what I was saying.