there was a legal analyst on tv talking about he could get three years
holy shyt, i didn't think it was that serious.
i kinda feel bad for him now.
it's his own fault but still
there was a legal analyst on tv talking about he could get three years
That's some real shyt. How can you have a title fight with Cormier(who just got his ass whipped by Jones) and Rumble and expect your champion to have any sort of legitimacy?
They should have just fined Jones and be done with it. I'm sure the cacs at Sherdog are today, been waiting for years for Jones to lose the belt
I think if Rumble finishes Cormier, then the title looks somewhat legitimate, and it sets up a huge fight for when Jon Jones returns
but if Cormier wins (which i don't think he will) then you're right,
I'm not even trying to shyt on Rumble; I like him. I think he can even beat Jones. It's just that the stripping of the title was for PPV purposes(punishes Jones, still a LHW title fight at 187).
I'm shocked that you guys are surprised he got stripped.
The UFC has an image they're trying to cultivate, uphold, and protect.
Just like Reebok, it's all about branding
I get that but it's silly. If they wanted to send a message they should have cut him(they certainly have done that for much less egregious offenses).
Why would they cut him and allow a rival promotion to pick him up?
They're doing what they think is best for their business model
cormier doesnt deserve this fight. . .bader had the better and longer run, but it is what it is!
hope johnson wins in spectacular fashion
he shouldn't have his belt taken away so quickly like that