Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
I don't really care too much about this. It sounds like it was a mistake to force a sequel but whatever
"Joker: Folie a Deux" | sequel to "Joker" starring Joaquin Phoenix and Lady Gaga
- Thread starter Optimus Prime
- Start date
Diondon
Thanks to the lawyers uh, I marbled the foyer
If Campea say its ass I believe him
Cause that nikka loves everything
Cause that nikka loves everything
DaRealness
I think very deeply
The minute I heard there was a sequel in the works I knew it was gonna be a mistake, and I actually like the first movie, it's damn near a classic.
He said he looooved the first one,so he is one of the people to blame for them making another. Glad he had his time wasted
Might be an unpopular opinion but I didn't think the first movie was all that great.
Same
Think i just saw the ending spoiler to this movie on twitter smh.
And people had the nerve to argue this Joker was anything close to the one in the Nolan trilogy
And people had the nerve to argue this Joker was anything close to the one in the Nolan trilogy
You're finally out of the bushes cac?
And in terms of box office, the first one did over a billion dollars on a $70M budget. What I'm saying here is comments from a few posters don't mean anythingfaq..
This won’t age well
The ending.
Now I say 1% but they do tease and foreshadow the scene/twist a few times throughout the course of The Joker 2, just in a way you may not initially get upon first viewing. I’d argue not because of how clever it is either, but because of how…it’s certainly a choice.
I know I said spoilers but again, seriously, this is the point of no return.
Arthur ends up back in Arkham, the humanity in him winning out over “The Joker”. Harley having abandoned him upon realising he’s not Joker, he’s Arthur. Except that’s not a figure of speech like you may think, neither are the other hints leading up to another inmate walking up to Arthur (one we have seen in the background throughout the movie though his face has been largely obscured until now).
The inmate tells Arthur a joke, before Arthur can answer with the punchline the inmate stabs him to death. The inmate then gives himself the Glasgow smile, revealing he is the true Joker.
A brief director Q&A after the film further implied the events of the first movie may be not what they seem (to us). That Arthur was imagining himself/confusing himself as “The Joker” but many of the actual actions of “Joker” in the first film was this Joker that stabbed Arthur, “the true” Joker. And that one of the few instances of Arthur actually being Joker was the ending of the first movie, where he was wrongfully blamed for the actions of this Joker due to claiming responsibility that led to the trial in this one (and Harley wrongly falling for Arthur).
Also during the Q&A they teased this was a younger version of Heath Ledger’s Joker and this was somehow an origin movie for The Dark Knight’s Joker (even though this Gotham and Nolan’s don’t jive).
Now I say 1% but they do tease and foreshadow the scene/twist a few times throughout the course of The Joker 2, just in a way you may not initially get upon first viewing. I’d argue not because of how clever it is either, but because of how…it’s certainly a choice.
I know I said spoilers but again, seriously, this is the point of no return.
Arthur ends up back in Arkham, the humanity in him winning out over “The Joker”. Harley having abandoned him upon realising he’s not Joker, he’s Arthur. Except that’s not a figure of speech like you may think, neither are the other hints leading up to another inmate walking up to Arthur (one we have seen in the background throughout the movie though his face has been largely obscured until now).
The inmate tells Arthur a joke, before Arthur can answer with the punchline the inmate stabs him to death. The inmate then gives himself the Glasgow smile, revealing he is the true Joker.
A brief director Q&A after the film further implied the events of the first movie may be not what they seem (to us). That Arthur was imagining himself/confusing himself as “The Joker” but many of the actual actions of “Joker” in the first film was this Joker that stabbed Arthur, “the true” Joker. And that one of the few instances of Arthur actually being Joker was the ending of the first movie, where he was wrongfully blamed for the actions of this Joker due to claiming responsibility that led to the trial in this one (and Harley wrongly falling for Arthur).
Also during the Q&A they teased this was a younger version of Heath Ledger’s Joker and this was somehow an origin movie for The Dark Knight’s Joker (even though this Gotham and Nolan’s don’t jive).
Streets are saying
A car bomb goes off outside the courthouse after Arthur is found guilty. This allows him to escape thanks to the help of some of his followers. He ultimately flees to stairs that we all know and finds Lee. She leaves him because she realizes he’s not really the Joker and the police take him back into custody. Back in prison, the guards come to get Arthur to see a visitor. An inmate stops him, tells a “joke”, then repeatedly stabs Arthur in the stomach. As he’s left bleeding out on the floor, the unnamed inmate cackles and appears to carve a “smile” into his own face.
Red Shield
Global Domination
My local theater has devoted 12 showings for this on friday 
The ending.
Now I say 1% but they do tease and foreshadow the scene/twist a few times throughout the course of The Joker 2, just in a way you may not initially get upon first viewing. I’d argue not because of how clever it is either, but because of how…it’s certainly a choice.
I know I said spoilers but again, seriously, this is the point of no return.
Arthur ends up back in Arkham, the humanity in him winning out over “The Joker”. Harley having abandoned him upon realising he’s not Joker, he’s Arthur. Except that’s not a figure of speech like you may think, neither are the other hints leading up to another inmate walking up to Arthur (one we have seen in the background throughout the movie though his face has been largely obscured until now).
The inmate tells Arthur a joke, before Arthur can answer with the punchline the inmate stabs him to death. The inmate then gives himself the Glasgow smile, revealing he is the true Joker.
A brief director Q&A after the film further implied the events of the first movie may be not what they seem (to us). That Arthur was imagining himself/confusing himself as “The Joker” but many of the actual actions of “Joker” in the first film was this Joker that stabbed Arthur, “the true” Joker. And that one of the few instances of Arthur actually being Joker was the ending of the first movie, where he was wrongfully blamed for the actions of this Joker due to claiming responsibility that led to the trial in this one (and Harley wrongly falling for Arthur).
Also during the Q&A they teased this was a younger version of Heath Ledger’s Joker and this was somehow an origin movie for The Dark Knight’s Joker (even though this Gotham and Nolan’s don’t jive).
All the people who have been telling me about this new D.C revival. Would you like to claim this movie as part of the real D.C,or is everything that happens after this the real D.C? Let us know now,aint no going back
Child_Of_God
Love is a long road.
It’s obvious that Todd didn’t really want to do another Joker but the suits pressured him to directed the second film anyway so he was like
“fukk it, might as well make this nikka go out with a bang so they won’t bother me anymore.”
All the people who have been telling me about this new D.C revival. Would you like to claim this movie as part of the real D.C,or is everything that happens after this the real D.C? Let us know now,aint no going back
They're saying this is old DC as it's a sequel to the first film that predates James Gunn. Everything from Superman 2025 is new DC............that rule does not apply to The Batman and Penguin tho
