Joe Budden is an a$$hole and never right
This
Joe Budden and Ish argue over an ex. Who was right?
- Thread starter Ethnic Vagina Finder
- Start date
This
People can tell you all day what they won’t do, but wont know until the opportunity presents itself. Ish being mad over what Joe said is corny and yelling about it is cornier.
Is Joe right? No. But Ish shouldn’t still be angry. He should just know he can’t trust Joe to keep his word.
Is Joe right? No. But Ish shouldn’t still be angry. He should just know he can’t trust Joe to keep his word.
So in my mind, I think back to Joe budden circa 10 years ago and literally all he did was have pool parties and smoke hookah
In my mind, there’s a hundred people at his crib and Ish’ ex is one of them. Ish is a dumbass for trying to hold Joe to the letter of the law, ‘you said you wouldn’t entertain her
‘, as if Joe is going to deny her entry simply she dated Ish. We all know damn well what ‘entertain’ means in that context
The bottom line for everyone citing ‘man law’, man law is dont fukk my ex. It ain’t ‘don’t go out where my ex may be’, or ‘don’t let my ex come to your event’.
If Joe didn’t fukk her, if he wasn’t smoking hookah with her dolo, then he did nothing wrong
Verdict: Joe
In my mind, there’s a hundred people at his crib and Ish’ ex is one of them. Ish is a dumbass for trying to hold Joe to the letter of the law, ‘you said you wouldn’t entertain her
‘, as if Joe is going to deny her entry simply she dated Ish. We all know damn well what ‘entertain’ means in that context The bottom line for everyone citing ‘man law’, man law is dont fukk my ex. It ain’t ‘don’t go out where my ex may be’, or ‘don’t let my ex come to your event’.
If Joe didn’t fukk her, if he wasn’t smoking hookah with her dolo, then he did nothing wrong
Verdict: Joe
Last edited:
Saying they were on a friendship break, so previous declarations of what he will or won't do is a wild ass defense for him to try to pull, though.
He didnt,Ish bought that detail in. I just thought it was a good defense
If i havent talked to you in 6 years becsuse we fell out,and you not family? We probably aint rekindling a friendship,thats some shyt only women do. So I could understand if Joe had no loyalty to him at that point.
Ish seem like one of those dudes who pretend he dont care. But will definitely be in his feelings later. Thats why I dont play that game of asking dudes permission to talk to they ex. Or even a girl I know they were interested in,but never dated. Almost all dudes pretend they too cool for school and not worried about a bytch. But will be salty after the fact anyway,seen it too often.
They (he) are celebrities. Their exes happen to be in the industry probably.
Imagine Tom cruise’s best friend is idk Leo Decaprio. Imagine Leo de caprio refusing to even talk to Nicole Kidman. It doesn’t make sense.
Again the man law is dont fukk my ex, not dont even look at or talk to my ex. If you not tryin to smash, if there’s no 1 on 1 dialogue, be an adult.
Leo would never say "i wont entertain your ex" nor would have the thought to smash old ass Nicole Kidman, so it' would definitely be all business. terrible example brodie
When your house is the kick back spot that everyone in your friend group goes to chill.
Contexts matters. You need to know the history to understand that more than likely there were a group of people over his house on the evening in question.
How you gonna say “Context matters and you need to know the history”….then completely fabricate how you think it went down?
Fani Willis fan
Veteran
If that context was relevant he would clarify that she came to a pool party or a public setting. He is being antagonistic by leaving things up to interpretation.So in my mind, I think back to Joe budden circa 10 years ago and literally all he did was have pool parties and smoke hookah
In my mind, there’s a hundred people at his crib and Ish’ ex is one of them. Ish is a dumbass for trying to hold Joe to the letter of the law, ‘you said you wouldn’t entertain her
The bottom line for everyone citing ‘man law’, man law is dont fukk my ex. It ain’t ‘don’t go out where my ex may be’, or ‘don’t let my ex come to your event’.
If Joe didn’t fukk her, if he wasn’t smoking hookah with her dolo, then he did nothing wrong
Verdict: Joe
Joe is wrong, and is gaslighting hard, he said he would not do something yet he did, no matter how innocuous the scenario it contradicts his original position.
Ethnic Vagina Finder
The Great Paper Chaser
So in my mind, I think back to Joe budden circa 10 years ago and literally all he did was have pool parties and smoke hookah
In my mind, there’s a hundred people at his crib and Ish’ ex is one of them. Ish is a dumbass for trying to hold Joe to the letter of the law, ‘you said you wouldn’t entertain her
The bottom line for everyone citing ‘man law’, man law is dont fukk my ex. It ain’t ‘don’t go out where my ex may be’, or ‘don’t let my ex come to your event’.
If Joe didn’t fukk her, if he wasn’t smoking hookah with her dolo, then he did nothing wrong
Verdict: Joe
It’s 1000% relevant bc they go to the same parties. The same events.
And again, we all know——or I assumed —-we all know what ‘entertain ’ means. There is 2 different connotations of that word. Ish is being literal. Whereas MAN LAW, is not literal, it’s used in the connotation of how you ‘Entertain a thought’. NOT Turn her away from your event as in literal entertainment
Joe is an a$$hole but he hit the mark when he said ‘that don’t sound like thank you for not fukkin my bytch’ 
THAT is his bro code obligation. Nothing more. We grown ass men I’m not NOT goin a place bc yo ex there, or havin 100 folk at the crib and ima ‘not let her turn the nob’. Foh I’m not even thinking of her ass but what I will not do is adjust for your insecurity.
THAT is his bro code obligation. Nothing more. We grown ass men I’m not NOT goin a place bc yo ex there, or havin 100 folk at the crib and ima ‘not let her turn the nob’. Foh I’m not even thinking of her ass but what I will not do is adjust for your insecurity.
Straw Hat Luffy
Veteran
So you’re using an argument of what Joe used to do ten years agoSo in my mind, I think back to Joe budden circa 10 years ago and literally all he did was have pool parties and smoke hookah
In my mind, there’s a hundred people at his crib and Ish’ ex is one of them. Ish is a dumbass for trying to hold Joe to the letter of the law, ‘you said you wouldn’t entertain her
The bottom line for everyone citing ‘man law’, man law is dont fukk my ex. It ain’t ‘don’t go out where my ex may be’, or ‘don’t let my ex come to your event’.
If Joe didn’t fukk her, if he wasn’t smoking hookah with her dolo, then he did nothing wrong
Verdict: Joe
Nah
In context Man Law is when a dude is done with a girl, the homies have to basically lose all contact
The only context that works is if a dude was friends with a girl before his homie started dating her, they’re publicly known to be good friends, or the ex/friend doesn’t give a fukk
If this were the other way around Joe would cut ties with ish on some petty shyt
If this were two girls, and one of those girls hung out with the other’s ex smoking hookah at a dudes crib, hair is getting pulled
no, the universal meaning of entertain is not fukkin.It’s 1000% relevant bc they go to the same parties. The same events.
And again, we all know——or I assumed —-we all know what ‘entertain ’ means. There is 2 different connotations of that word. Ish is being literal. Whereas MAN LAW, is not literal, it’s used in the connotation of how you ‘Entertain a thought’. NOT Turn her away from your event as in literal entertainment
and no, that example is not relevant, because the situations aren't near the same. Leo wouldn't have fukked Nicole Kidman 20 years ago, she was still too old
