@Warren Moon made up an elaborate conspiracy theory that began with the claim that Rep. Engel controlled the Hudson Tunnel project (even though it's not a federal project, he's not on the right committee to control the federal funding, and he is virtually never mentioned in connection with the project at all). He then claimed that Rep. Engel had ensured that all the contracts and employment the project would create would go to Black workers (not only constitutionally implausible but also impossible in practice as the funding for said contracts hasn't even been allocated yet), and that this was part of a secret deal that garnered him the CBC endorsement (which not only has zero basis in reality, but contradicts @Warren Moon's previous insistent claims that the CBC wasn't endorsing Engel at all).
I proved, with dozens of receipts, that the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey were the actual ones who controlled the project, that Rep. Jerry Nadler was actually the main one representing the project at the federal level, and that literally not a single step of his secret conspiracy even could have happened to date.
And his response to being sonned so badly on that one is to repeatedly tag me in a completely different thread screaming, "But do you know the names of the Demmings's twin sons?????"
Married in 1988, three kids, 5 grandkids, one marriage between them.
@*DalMem*
Imagine how these photos would play in the best southwest.
@Warren Moon got a point. Not a cacazoid in sight in these photos. It sucks Kamala got such a head start on her.
Dallas, Houston, Atlanta, Charlotte, Orlando, Miami would shutdown the polls for this.
'
Of corse not. When the Obama's met, Barrack was a summer intern at a law firm. Making little to no money. Michelle had been at a firm for a couple years. Meanwhile the Demings were both cops lmao.
Its not even a close comepetition. That's a beautiful generational black family.
Put these photos up in black churches or neighborhoods and its over, those grandbabies would deliver the presidency to Biden no doubt.
Black America would love them and would KNOW them.
Val Demings caters towards the exact black voters Hilary Lost.
Black Collar voters
She's the best option at this point. For black America and America overall.
What’s her policies?
It wasn't that I "couldn't find it online", it's that you not only couldn't back it up with ANY receipts at all (not even the slightest allusion or tiniest bit of evidence), and then I showed you information that EXPLICITLY contradicted it.No conspiracy theory made up. Thats just straight facts and because you couldnt find it online, you said it was untrue. Thats all it comes down to.
This is HL. So don't post like you think everyone here is incapable of using their brain.So before I posted how Val and her husband contracted a black owned firmed to remove some of the transgressions from her sons from the internet. I just wanted to give you a chance to validate that.
I know if you cant personally verify it on the internet, its untrue to you. So I wanted to give you a chance to do that. You'll find it, keep looking.
She's got great policies on police reform IMO tho.
It wasn't that I "couldn't find it online", it's that you not only couldn't back it up with ANY receipts at all (not even the slightest allusion or tiniest bit of evidence), and then I showed you information that EXPLICITLY contradicted it.
"Don't believe your lying eyes, believe me!"
You seriously wanted us to believe that Warren Moon personally knew of a years-long conspiracy involving tens of billions of dollars that NO ONE ELSE had gotten the slightest wind of in the entire history of media. That the people you speak to are so important they are sharing information with you no one else knows anything about, yet so stupid that they would share that information with someone like you just for you to blab about it on the fukking Coli.
This is HL. So don't post like you think everyone here is incapable of using their brain.
Can a private person hire a firm to try to scrub the internet of unsavory information? Yes, they can try to do that, of course it will work to varying degrees depending on what was out there. If the person involved is a private individual and you don't even know their name, of course it will be relatively easier to hide information.
Does that have ANYTHING to do with you fukking up and claiming a Congressman was in charge of one of the biggest projects in the county when he hardly had anything to do with it? Does that have ANYTHING to do with the fact that you didn't even know Rep. Nadler was the one leading the project out of the House even though his name was all over every story about the project? Does that have anything to do with you making up a conspiracy theory that couldn't even work as an idea because it would have blatantly violated Congressional powers and been impossible considering the known progress of the tunnel to date?
The worst part about your constant fukk-ups on this site isn't that you make them. It's that you KEEP reminding everyone of them, bumping them on new threads that have nothing to do with them, and just keep digging that hole deeper and deeper cause you don't know how to take an L.
Actions speak louder than words.
"According to a 2015 article in The Atlantic, the Orlando Police Department "has a long record of excessive-force allegations, and a lack of transparency on the subject, dating back at least as far as Demings's time as chief."[10] A 2008 Orlando Weekly exposé described the Orlando Police Department as "a place where rogue cops operate with impunity, and there's nothing anybody who finds himself at the wrong end of their short fuse can do about it."[11] Demings responded with an op-ed in the Orlando Sentinel, arguing that "Looking for a negative story in a police department is like looking for a prayer at church" and added that "It won't take long to find one." In the same op-ed, she cast doubt on video evidence that conflicts with officers' statements in excessive force cases, writing, "a few seconds (even of video) rarely capture the entire set of circumstances."[10]
In 2010, an Orlando police officer flipped 84-year-old Daniel Daley over his shoulder after the man became belligerent, throwing him to the ground and breaking a vertebra in his neck.[12] Daley alleged excessive force and filed a lawsuit. The police department cleared the officer as "justified" in using a "hard take down" to arrest Daley, concluding he used the technique correctly even though he and the other officer made conflicting statements. Demings said "the officer performed the technique within department guidelines" but also said that her department had "begun the process of reviewing the use of force policy and will make appropriate modifications." A federal jury ruled in Daley's favor and awarded him $880,000 in damages.[10][13][14][15][16]"
She was on the force from 1983-2011, serving as chief from 2007-2011. Yet Orlando PD was poor on the subject while she was chief and has remained poor since, and she didn't seem to be helping matters. If she has great policies on police reform, why didn't she enact them during her 27-year career on the force when she was in the exact most powerful position to do so? Why did she appear to side with those who block accountability?
lol...She tried. The unions blocked her. She couldn't even fire bad cops.
What do your eyes tell you tho man? What do you see on the internet about the Demings twins?
Actions speak louder than words.
"According to a 2015 article in The Atlantic, the Orlando Police Department "has a long record of excessive-force allegations, and a lack of transparency on the subject, dating back at least as far as Demings's time as chief."[10] A 2008 Orlando Weekly exposé described the Orlando Police Department as "a place where rogue cops operate with impunity, and there's nothing anybody who finds himself at the wrong end of their short fuse can do about it."[11] Demings responded with an op-ed in the Orlando Sentinel, arguing that "Looking for a negative story in a police department is like looking for a prayer at church" and added that "It won't take long to find one." In the same op-ed, she cast doubt on video evidence that conflicts with officers' statements in excessive force cases, writing, "a few seconds (even of video) rarely capture the entire set of circumstances."[10]
In 2010, an Orlando police officer flipped 84-year-old Daniel Daley over his shoulder after the man became belligerent, throwing him to the ground and breaking a vertebra in his neck.[12] Daley alleged excessive force and filed a lawsuit. The police department cleared the officer as "justified" in using a "hard take down" to arrest Daley, concluding he used the technique correctly even though he and the other officer made conflicting statements. Demings said "the officer performed the technique within department guidelines" but also said that her department had "begun the process of reviewing the use of force policy and will make appropriate modifications." A federal jury ruled in Daley's favor and awarded him $880,000 in damages.[10][13][14][15][16]"
She was on the force from 1983-2011, serving as chief from 2007-2011. Yet Orlando PD was poor on the subject while she was chief and has remained poor since, and she didn't seem to be helping matters. If she has great policies on police reform, why didn't she enact them during her 27-year career on the force when she was in the exact most powerful position to do so? Why did she appear to side with those who block accountability?
Actions speak louder than words.
"According to a 2015 article in The Atlantic, the Orlando Police Department "has a long record of excessive-force allegations, and a lack of transparency on the subject, dating back at least as far as Demings's time as chief."[10] A 2008 Orlando Weekly exposé described the Orlando Police Department as "a place where rogue cops operate with impunity, and there's nothing anybody who finds himself at the wrong end of their short fuse can do about it."[11] Demings responded with an op-ed in the Orlando Sentinel, arguing that "Looking for a negative story in a police department is like looking for a prayer at church" and added that "It won't take long to find one." In the same op-ed, she cast doubt on video evidence that conflicts with officers' statements in excessive force cases, writing, "a few seconds (even of video) rarely capture the entire set of circumstances."[10]
In 2010, an Orlando police officer flipped 84-year-old Daniel Daley over his shoulder after the man became belligerent, throwing him to the ground and breaking a vertebra in his neck.[12] Daley alleged excessive force and filed a lawsuit. The police department cleared the officer as "justified" in using a "hard take down" to arrest Daley, concluding he used the technique correctly even though he and the other officer made conflicting statements. Demings said "the officer performed the technique within department guidelines" but also said that her department had "begun the process of reviewing the use of force policy and will make appropriate modifications." A federal jury ruled in Daley's favor and awarded him $880,000 in damages.[10][13][14][15][16]"
She was on the force from 1983-2011, serving as chief from 2007-2011. Yet Orlando PD was poor on the subject while she was chief and has remained poor since, and she didn't seem to be helping matters. If she has great policies on police reform, why didn't she enact them during her 27-year career on the force when she was in the exact most powerful position to do so? Why did she appear to side with those who block accountability?
Thank you for sharing this, Demings got some skeletons in her closet in Orlando..