Pretty sure they won't. She is not well liked among those who are even considering staying home. The Progressives who like her are already voting for Biden.
Yeah I agree. Bernie as VP would be the choice for unifying the base, but that ain't happening. Next best strategy is to increase minority turnout as much as you can to Obama 2008 levels. We already have the white moderate represented in Biden, he needs a minority woman, preferably a black women as VP.
Dude she was for keeping people in jail for cheap labor purposes. That's reprehensible.
Source? From a reputable site?
Google it man. It's really not hard to find at all. I don't know what you consider a reputable source.
This claim comes from a February Daily Beast article. It found lawyers in then AG Harris’ office argued in 2014 that, despite court orders to reduce state prison crowding, some non-violent offenders needed to stay in the prison system to help combat wildfires. It does not detail how many prisoners, if any, ended up staying longer than required.
Why do you think they were charged with trying to keep people in prison? She didn't like the answer lawyers on her team gave but they were definitely charged with keeping people in prison. Why? Is there any good reason?This claim comes from a February Daily Beast article. It found lawyers in then AG Harris’ office argued in 2014 that, despite court orders to reduce state prison crowding, some non-violent offenders needed to stay in the prison system to help combat wildfires. It does not detail how many prisoners, if any, ended up staying longer than required.
A spokesperson for Harris was quoted in the article saying, "Senator Harris was shocked and troubled by the use of this argument. She looked into it and directed the department’s attorneys not to make that argument again."
SOURCE: PolitiFact - Were Tulsi Gabbard’s attacks on Kamala Harris’ record as a California prosecutor on target?
So once again, what's so bad about Kamala? She's married to White man? She's half-Indian? Or is it just the fact that she was a prosecutor? Only White people should be prosecutors?
Kamala would be a great VP pick
That's a separate issue. Also, I never said that she's never done anything wrong.Why do you think they were charged with trying to keep people in prison? She didn't like the answer lawyers on her team gave but they were definitely charged with keeping people in prison. Why? Is there any good reason?
So you don't like this one how about refusing to file any type of suit against Steve Mnuchin and his bank for "Widepread misconduct"?
Kamala Harris' complicated history with Wall Street will come under scrutiny in the 2020 race
In 2012, the California Department of Justice found in an investigation that OneWest Bank participated in “widespread misconduct” when foreclosing on homes, recommending that Harris file a civil enforcement action against the bank. However, Harris declined to prosecute OneWest or its then-CEO, Steven Mnuchin, despite the department’s recommendation. A spokesman for Mnuchin called the allegations “garbage.”
The OneWest issue was resurfaced in 2017 when Mnuchin was nominated to serve as Treasury secretary. She was also the only Democratic Senate candidate to receive a donation from Mnuchin during the 2016 elections, according to FEC records. Still, she voted against his confirmation as Treasury secretary.
In a 2017 interview with The Hill, Harris pushed back against criticism of her decision. “We went and we followed the facts and the evidence, and it’s a decision my office made,” she said.
“There was no question One West conducted predatory lending, and Senator Harris believes they should be punished,” Ian Sams, national press secretary for Harris’s campaign, told CNBC in an email. “Unfortunately, the law was squarely on their side and they were shielded from state subpoenas because they’re a federal bank.” The California Justice Department’s memo noted that “the investigation was hampered by our inability to subpoena OneWest,” but that would not have prevented Harris from filing a civil enforcement action against the bank if she chose to do so.
She let Trump's boy slide and possibly because he was a contributor to her.
If this isn't satisfying I got more.
.Why do you think they were charged with trying to keep people in prison? She didn't like the answer lawyers on her team gave but they were definitely charged with keeping people in prison. Why? Is there any good reason?
So you don't like this one how about refusing to file any type of suit against Steve Mnuchin and his bank for "Widepread misconduct"?
Kamala Harris' complicated history with Wall Street will come under scrutiny in the 2020 race
In 2012, the California Department of Justice found in an investigation that OneWest Bank participated in “widespread misconduct” when foreclosing on homes, recommending that Harris file a civil enforcement action against the bank. However, Harris declined to prosecute OneWest or its then-CEO, Steven Mnuchin, despite the department’s recommendation. A spokesman for Mnuchin called the allegations “garbage.”
The OneWest issue was resurfaced in 2017 when Mnuchin was nominated to serve as Treasury secretary. She was also the only Democratic Senate candidate to receive a donation from Mnuchin during the 2016 elections, according to FEC records. Still, she voted against his confirmation as Treasury secretary.
In a 2017 interview with The Hill, Harris pushed back against criticism of her decision. “We went and we followed the facts and the evidence, and it’s a decision my office made,” she said.
“There was no question One West conducted predatory lending, and Senator Harris believes they should be punished,” Ian Sams, national press secretary for Harris’s campaign, told CNBC in an email. “Unfortunately, the law was squarely on their side and they were shielded from state subpoenas because they’re a federal bank.” The California Justice Department’s memo noted that “the investigation was hampered by our inability to subpoena OneWest,” but that would not have prevented Harris from filing a civil enforcement action against the bank if she chose to do so.
She let Trump's boy slide and possibly because he was a contributor to her.
If this isn't satisfying I got more.
The fact that you don’t see being a prosecutor as a negative given the criminal justice climate speaks volumes.This claim comes from a February Daily Beast article. It found lawyers in then AG Harris’ office argued in 2014 that, despite court orders to reduce state prison crowding, some non-violent offenders needed to stay in the prison system to help combat wildfires. It does not detail how many prisoners, if any, ended up staying longer than required.
A spokesperson for Harris was quoted in the article saying, "Senator Harris was shocked and troubled by the use of this argument. She looked into it and directed the department’s attorneys not to make that argument again."
SOURCE: PolitiFact - Were Tulsi Gabbard’s attacks on Kamala Harris’ record as a California prosecutor on target?
So once again, what's so bad about Kamala? She's married to White man? She's half-Indian? Or is it just the fact that she was a prosecutor? Only White people should be prosecutors?
Kamala would be a great VP pick
