Jill Stein is 'Predatory', says AOC

UpNext

Superstar
Joined
Aug 23, 2019
Messages
4,495
Reputation
1,512
Daps
16,555
Let me revise that statement. They don't affect FBA. They do affect tethers though. We don't have the same political needs, loser. We're not going to vote how you want us to.
I mean you gotta understand, you're literally talking to people who are so internet brained out, they think voter ID laws are a serious political issue worth mentioning. One of the people you're talking to only talks to black people on social media and lives in Japan. These are the cartoon characters that post in this thread.:mjlol:
 

Mister Terrific

It’s in the name
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
5,353
Reputation
1,487
Daps
19,235
Reppin
Michigan
I mean you gotta understand, you're literally talking to people who are so internet brained out, they think voter ID laws are a serious political issue worth mentioning. One of the people you're talking to only talks to black people on social media and lives in Japan. These are the cartoon characters that post in this thread.:mjlol:
My co-teacher just the other day was Black c00nski. :mjgrin: One thing I know is 80+ of Black folks are gonna vote Harris and not your orange daddy.

As for voter ID laws

This is from an appeals court decision that ended a NC voter ID law:

This history of restricting African American voting rights through facially neutral laws is not ancient; it is also a twenty-first century phenomenon. H.B. 589, the first voter ID law successfully enacted by the General Assembly in 2013 was invalidated because it was designed to discriminate against African American voters. Prior to the passage of H.B. 589, legislative staff in the General Assembly sought data on voter turnout during the 2008 election, broken down by race. With this data in hand, legislators excluded many types of IDs that were disproportionately used by African Americans from the list of qualifying forms of voter ID under H.B. 589. McCrory, 831 F.3d at 216. 211. After reviewing the evidence showing that the General Assembly sought to use race data to determine the list of qualifying forms of ID under H.B. 589, and excluded forms of ID that African American voters held disproportionately to white voters, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit invalidated the law, holding that the General Assembly “target[ed] African Americans with almost surgical precision.” McCrory, 831 F.3d at 214.


People of color are in fact disproportionately IDless.



18 percent—or almost 6 million—citizens over the age of 65 do not have photo ID;
16 percent of Latino voters do not have government-issued photo ID;
25 percent of voting age African Americans—5.5 million people – do not have ID; and
15 percent of voting age Americans who earn less than $35,000 do not have ID.




Btw i am positively shocked what states that require voter ID
1280px-Map_of_US_Voter_ID_Laws_by_State.svg.png





Once again the other c00n retard probably your alt @Cobalt Sire can’t decipher intent from results. The results of voter ID laws may show that the impact is negligible but the execution of the law is with racist intent. Just like Trump intended for RFK jr to disrupt Harris but instead fukked himself.


Is any of this too complicated for you to understand or are your alts sharing a brain cell?
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2018
Messages
6,597
Reputation
738
Daps
16,537

I've asked this question once and I'll ask it again - Why is The Democrat Party (and their neoconlib warmonger shills) so shook of Jill Stein? According to The Democrat Party (and their neoconlib warmonger shills) Jill is an irrelevant grifter.
I swear, they doth protest too much.
 

JT-Money

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
11,476
Reputation
3,693
Daps
49,776
Reppin
NULL
I've asked this question once and I'll ask it again - Why is The Democrat Party (and their neoconlib warmonger shills) so shook of Jill Stein? According to The Democrat Party (and their neoconlib warmonger shills) Jill is an irrelevant grifter.
I swear, they doth protest too much.
I'm guessing because the usual scare tactics and shaming language aren't working to drum up votes.

They've propped up another weak candidate just like Hillary who might lose. They made the mistake of not attacking Stein enough last time. It's the reason why they attacked black men this time also.

DESPERATION!!
 

Black Panther

Long Live The King
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
13,951
Reputation
10,333
Daps
72,197
Reppin
Wakanda
I've asked this question once and I'll ask it again - Why is The Democrat Party (and their neoconlib warmonger shills) so shook of Jill Stein? According to The Democrat Party (and their neoconlib warmonger shills) Jill is an irrelevant grifter.
I swear, they doth protest too much.

Disingenuous framing aside...:unimpressed:

Stein voters--who tend to be left-wing--voted 3rd party in numbers greater than the slim margin Clinton lost key swing states by in 2016.

In other words, winning the electoral votes of a swing state can come down to how 15-20k folks in a key district/county vote. This is one reason why it's always important to vote; greater turnout can actually overcome this effect.

If about ~30,000 Stein voters in Michigan and Pennsylvania voted Democrat, Donald Trump would have never become president.
 

yseJ

Empire strikes back
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
44,527
Reputation
2,547
Daps
63,960
Reppin
The Yay
Having a minority party in most countries is a pretty nice racket.
It really isn't tho? Many if not majority of countries with multiparty system have proportional representation.


This means a party with 10% of support would typically get 10% representation in a legislative body.

This makes it easier for people to feel represented. Also a lot easier for more radical coalitions to get a piece of the pie.

Whereas in a winner-take-all two party system disguised as a multiparty system that is US, you are always going to have a lot more centrist views. And yes in such a system minority parties are a grift.
 
Top