Jesus Was A Real Person...There's No Debate...Read a Book
- Thread starter AlainLocke
- Start date
Take It In Blood
Banned
You're in the scientific minority with this opinion, sitting right next to Ben Carson. But you have a right to be wrong. You pretty much have to reject evolution to be a Christian otherwise the entire puzzle completely falls apart
What does Jesus say about having premarital sex and dating multiple women like you do with no remorse?
Yeah yeah more rhetoric, come with proofs playboy. Not just talking points. You remind me of a zionist shill defending Israel.
Take It In Blood
Banned
I'm not a teacher brehs but there's a wealth of knowledge and information on the internet, the same textbooks, studies and articles that are available to PhD students are available to all of us free of charge on the internet. The knowledge is at your fingertips and can accesed through a device that sits in your pocket.
But as a starting point I'd recommend starting with human anthropology and working ur way back. Look up Homo Erectus, Homo Habilis, Homo Egaster, Homo Neanderthal...etc...etc
These muthafukas ain't modern humans and they definitely aren't any species of modern ape living today. So where the fuk do they come from?
Just stop breh!
I have thoroughly embarrassed you on these boards before with your CAC Darwinian evolutionary nonsense.
Are heritable traits passed down and change over time within populations? Of course we see it everyday.
Just because we see this does not give you or any atheist liar the right to OVER extrapolate the evidence and say that over billions of years minor mutations, blind processes and changes are responsible for the diversity of life we see.
The more we learn about the complexity and brilliance of DNA, cac evolution is falling apart at the seams
You can also sit down with that foolish belief that all of life shares a universal last common ancestor. Which there is not ONE shred of evidence for it either.
Natural Selection (blind process) and Mutations (the linchpin of CAC evolution) has no real scientific backing.
Time + Matter + Chance = everything brehs
Take It In Blood
Banned
So the act of animals sexually selecting for certain traits which gradually become amplified and more complexed as the process continues overtime is completely false?Just stop breh!
I have thoroughly embarrassed you on these boards before with your CAC Darwinian evolutionary nonsense.
Are heritable traits passed down and change over time within populations? Of course we see it everyday.
Just because we see this does not give you or any atheist liar the right to OVER extrapolate the evidence and say that over billions of years minor mutations, blind processes and changes are responsible for the diversity of life we see.
The more we learn about the complexity and brilliance of DNA, cac evolution is falling apart at the seams
You can also sit down with that foolish belief that all of life shares a universal last common ancestor. Which there is not ONE shred of evidence for it either.
Natural Selection (blind process) and Mutations (the linchpin of CAC evolution) has no real scientific backing.
Time + Matter + Chance = everything brehs
What alternative can you present that explains the large variety of species on this planet?
What you're about to type next could potentially win you a Nobel Prize and make you the most famous man on Earth. Or it could make you look like just another crazy religious person ignorant of the scientific facts
Last edited:
Either a person believes Yeshua is the Christ or no.
A person’s belief or disbelief in God does not invalidate God’s existence.
A person can choose not to believe in stars and planets we have yet to discover or see but they are there regardless of our seeing or knowing about them
The historical proof for Yeshua’s existence in secular and non secular sources is irrefutable.
Only those who don’t want to have Christ rule over them use these mental gymnastics to disprove it.
A person’s belief or disbelief in God does not invalidate God’s existence.
A person can choose not to believe in stars and planets we have yet to discover or see but they are there regardless of our seeing or knowing about them
The historical proof for Yeshua’s existence in secular and non secular sources is irrefutable.
Only those who don’t want to have Christ rule over them use these mental gymnastics to disprove it.
You realize most of those findings were fabricated right? Pieced together to make it seem different when in reality they were all just apes or humans.
How can you base modern science on something that cannot be proven, ever? Thus makes it unscientific and not following scientific method. Where is the proof that fish became reptiles?? where !!!
Why did evolution come to a halt? Why arent chimps somewhere slowly evolving into men? Where are the transitional fossils?
I can go on for days but your too brainwashed to actually listen to facts
Last edited:
Yeshua
Jesus is his name anglicized.
Same as Joshua, actually
Wait until the names James, John and Job hit your radar
New Atheists as they’re called generally don’t question the likelihood of “historical Jesus.”
feelosofer
#ninergang
Most historians believe Jesus existed. It's his divinity that is argued about.
