Jesus Was A Real Person...There's No Debate...Read a Book
- Thread starter AlainLocke
- Start date
Dzali OG
Dz Ali OG...Pay me like you owe me!
What tangible benefit does one receive for believing in jesus?
Black people...all of this is our fault due to how we talk. You know cacs take our slang serious at face value.
Example: In 500 years it may spread that Lebron, Jay z, Tom Brady, are all some type of hybrids by being part goat.
Half ass interpretations of afrikan peoples stories, etymology, slang, and creativeness are the genesis of all religions.
Cacs actually believed we worshipped gods...in their nosey, goofy way. They wanted us to worship them so they watched us (as they do now) and handed us gods to worship. With their own lil twist of course.
Thing is, something happened to black people back then which allowed us to fall for the okeedoke. There was a loss of knowledge and awareness. Perhaps some cataclysm.
All in all, they have us worshipping our slang and creative way with words.
Black people...all of this is our fault due to how we talk. You know cacs take our slang serious at face value.
Example: In 500 years it may spread that Lebron, Jay z, Tom Brady, are all some type of hybrids by being part goat.
Half ass interpretations of afrikan peoples stories, etymology, slang, and creativeness are the genesis of all religions.
Cacs actually believed we worshipped gods...in their nosey, goofy way. They wanted us to worship them so they watched us (as they do now) and handed us gods to worship. With their own lil twist of course.
Thing is, something happened to black people back then which allowed us to fall for the okeedoke. There was a loss of knowledge and awareness. Perhaps some cataclysm.
All in all, they have us worshipping our slang and creative way with words.
....ok
IsThatBrothaMouzone?
Superstar
Yeshua bin Yosef.....I think that was his name
Dameon Farrow
Superstar
That Jesus existed is in all honesty never really contested. Not sensibly, anyway. Now whether or not he was the son of god and ascended to heaven? Ladies and gentlemen, there are many many many many parables and stories that predate jesus that have a large amount of similarities. It makes for some great debate. Especially with folks who don't know anything about it because it doesn't get preached from the pulpit.
Exactly
Dwayne_Taylor
Superstar
No ...you read a book op 
- The Washington Post
Did historical Jesus really exist? The evidence just doesn't add up.
"Numerous secular scholars have presented their own versions of the so-called “Historical Jesus” – and most of them are, as biblical scholar J.D. Crossan puts it, “an academic embarrassment.” From Crossan’s view of Jesus as the wise sage, to Robert Eisenman’s Jesus the revolutionary, and Bart Ehrman’s apocalyptic prophet, about the only thing New Testament scholars seem to agree on is Jesus’ historical existence. But can even that be questioned?
The first problem we encounter when trying to discover more about the Historical Jesus is the lack of early sources. The earliest sources only reference the clearly fictional Christ of Faith. These early sources, compiled decades after the alleged events, all stem from Christian authors eager to promote Christianity – which gives us reason to question them. The authors of the Gospels fail to name themselves, describe their qualifications, or show any criticism with their foundational sources – which they also fail to identify. Filled with mythical and non-historical information, and heavily edited over time, the Gospels certainly should not convince critics to trust even the more mundane claims made therein."
- The Washington Post
Did historical Jesus really exist? The evidence just doesn't add up.
"Numerous secular scholars have presented their own versions of the so-called “Historical Jesus” – and most of them are, as biblical scholar J.D. Crossan puts it, “an academic embarrassment.” From Crossan’s view of Jesus as the wise sage, to Robert Eisenman’s Jesus the revolutionary, and Bart Ehrman’s apocalyptic prophet, about the only thing New Testament scholars seem to agree on is Jesus’ historical existence. But can even that be questioned?
The first problem we encounter when trying to discover more about the Historical Jesus is the lack of early sources. The earliest sources only reference the clearly fictional Christ of Faith. These early sources, compiled decades after the alleged events, all stem from Christian authors eager to promote Christianity – which gives us reason to question them. The authors of the Gospels fail to name themselves, describe their qualifications, or show any criticism with their foundational sources – which they also fail to identify. Filled with mythical and non-historical information, and heavily edited over time, the Gospels certainly should not convince critics to trust even the more mundane claims made therein."
Last edited:
the cac mamba
Veteran
he was just joseph smith, 2000 years ago. he didnt have any magic powers
YakSpiller
Veteran
You religious people
Them fairy tales be having y'all shook.
Them fairy tales be having y'all shook.
And where is the proof for that? There is absolutely no proof of evolution of kinds. There is however, abundant evidence that evolution is nonsense and doesnt even follow the scientific method.
Pick up a book and stop regurgitating the nonsense you see online.
People doubted Jesus as the Messiah when he was walking the earth
Heathens will heathen
Dust your sandals off and go to another instead of arguing with the damned
Heathens will heathen
Dust your sandals off and go to another instead of arguing with the damned
Its funny how people make fun of religious folks for believing in an outdated / unscientific belief, yet have blind faith in a theory from the 19th century where the guy who proposed it thought the cell was just a protoplasm ( jelly ) 