With respect to what that poster said, and specifically about the Egyptians, I'm not sure most scholars would agree the Egyptians were "excellent record keepers" or at least they would take issue with the word "excellent".
Yes, Egyptians kept records of many things, but they were idealist, not realist. Meaning, when it came to writings, inscriptions, depictions, they believed that these things lasted for eternity. And so, instead of writing/inscribing/depicting things how they happened in reality, they wrote/inscribed/depicted how they idealistically wanted things to be remembered for all time.
So anything that would have painted the Egyptians and/or Pharaohs in a negative light, it was not recorded, and if it was, would've been erased by a later Pharonic administration, or it was completely re-imagined altogether.
So the argument that the Exodus not being recorded by the Egyptians as evidence that it didn't happen is a very weak argument for anyone that has even the most cursory understanding of ancient Egyptian culture.
It's a reason why you don't see depictions of fat pharoahs or those in ill health.
It's a reason why you don't see many writings or depictions of defeats in wars or Egyptians taken into captivity.
It's a reason why out of its thousands of years of history, only one instance of a famine is recorded, which was in the Old Kingdom.
So why would they record the events of them encountering the foreign God of their foreign slaves pronouncing judgement upon them and turning the Egyptian system upside down?
There is nothing in me to think that they would.
I do believe there is evidence of it.
The name "Moses" is recorded in Egyptian history. The 18th dynasty was a dynasty of "Moses" Pharoahs.
In fact, the 18th dynasty is known as the "Thut
mosid Royal Family". It's very interesting that, particularly, in this generation of Pharaohs, they changed the polytheistic religious landscape of Egypt to monotheism almost overnight. I'm not sure there are examples of this anywhere else in antiquity especially without the presence of any major monotheistic religions in proximity. So where did it come from because this was completely out of left field? This makes me believe they encountered something.
The only people who were in close proximity to the Egyptians that were monotheistic were the Hebrews, and biblical history places them squarely inside Egyptian culture. And the way Egypt turned monotheistic is portrayed as having arisen from within instead of influences that were from the outside.
It is also during this time, that they started depicting things "realistically". Metaphorically, this could be looked at as a short period in time when Egyptians realized "truth" - the truth of reality, the truth of one God. This period is also marked by unparalleled prosperity. Egypt was at the height of its wealth and power characteristic of empires that seemingly had an unlimited supply of free (see: slave) labor.
Unfortunately, later Pharaohs came and erased and then re-imagined the history during this time because it reflected their proud culture negatively.
So I think the Egyptians provide enough evidence that something happened. That they encountered something that arose from within. But they certainly would not have been explicit in writings because clearly the Exodus was a time when the Egyptian way of life was turned upside down.
which means that Moses would have to devour the spirit of creation and the spirit of satisfaction with one snake. This woman unlike the others I've mentioned was the queen of Huni also known as "Huy"..."the smiter"
some inception type thinking is in order to me...i never knew that the daughter of pharaoh married Caleb 
does that mean that Aschah is actually Pharaoh's grand-daughter?
i have no idea what the other one means
