Jellyfish UFO's captured on military weapons camera

[Gloxina]

Supposedly there been reports of these type of objects throughout history the most recent was Japan when it tried to snatch a cow.

I think these things are living entities. I think space is filled with all types of life.

The UAP in Alaska that was shot down, the pilots reported it being octagonal, it appeared to have strings or something hanging down from it.

Very much could be something like this

Uh what?

 

[Professor Emeritus]

A bug changing its body temperature in seconds?

The object isn't changing its body temperature, the camera is recalibrating during the shot.

This is yet another one of those instances where people are watching the camera settings change and mistakenly believe it's the object that is changing.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

So, they can travel light-years and/or through dimensions but can't avoid being detected by night vision/infrared/thermal cameras you can buy on Temu.

​

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Here's some helpful additional information:





So:


1) The claims that it shot up out of the water appear to be false

2) The claims that it is changing temperature appear likely to be false

3) Nothing was visible with the naked eye, which supports the suggestion that it might have been something stuck to the camera housing



I like the theory that it's a spider's moulted skin. Dead skin, probably hanging from a web thread stuck to the top of the lens guard housing, as the operator moves the camera it gives the impression that it's moving across the background when in reality only the camera is moving. At some point it falls off and that's the end of the story.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

If it was an alien of any sort, like some people are suggesting, then you have to answer some odd questions.


Why is it so peculiarly shaped, but none of those shapes do anything? All those weird bumps and parts, but literally not one of them moves in any way the entire time?

Why does the object just float in a straight line the entire time, apparently incapable of changing its course?

Why would it be floating over a military base in the first place? Even if it wanted to observe the base for some strange reason, couldn't it have done that from much further away?



There's literally zero reason to think it's an alien, and several logical reasons to suggest that's a weak explanation. It doesn't "do" anything remarkable the entire time. It's just floating in a line. If it's not somethin stuck to the housing/lens, then it's probably just a bunch of oddly shaped balloons. People in Iraq like their balloons in bunches too.

Someone made a hypothetical graphic of what a bunch of Eid balloons mashed together might look like:

 

[TEH]

These are from the Marine Kingdom

 

[The Prince of All Saiyans]

 

[jaydawg08]

If it was an alien of any sort, like some people are suggesting, then you have to answer some odd questions.


Why is it so peculiarly shaped, but none of those shapes do anything? All those weird bumps and parts, but literally not one of them moves in any way the entire time?

Why does the object just float in a straight line the entire time, apparently incapable of changing its course?

Why would it be floating over a military base in the first place? Even if it wanted to observe the base for some strange reason, couldn't it have done that from much further away?



There's literally zero reason to think it's an alien, and several logical reasons to suggest that's a weak explanation. It doesn't "do" anything remarkable the entire time. It's just floating in a line. If it's not somethin stuck to the housing/lens, then it's probably just a bunch of oddly shaped balloons. People in Iraq like their balloons in bunches too.

Someone made a hypothetical graphic of what a bunch of Eid balloons mashed together might look like:

Except balloons move in the wind.. this was stationary (talking about the lower portions of this object that hang down) and not visible to people on the ground (as literally said in your tweet)

I know you got that from metabunk and even the person who put that together wasn't convinced that's likely from his own picture lol

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Except balloons move in the wind.. this was stationary (talking about the lower portions of this object that hang down) and not visible to people on the ground (as literally said in your tweet)

I know you got that from metabunk and even the person who put that together wasn't convinced that's likely from his own picture lol

I already pointed out that something hanging from the camera housing is more likely than balloons, and you ignored that. You also ignored the witness from the base who said he thinks it was something hanging from the housing too. He said he believes in alien visitations himself, but he thinks this object was just some regular shyt.

And the stationary nature of the object kills your theory more than mine. Why the fukk would some sort of alien flying craft be shaped so strangely, yet have every single aspect of that shape be completely stationary and just floating along unmoving the entire time? It makes MUCH more sense for that to be the characteristics of a bunch of balloons tied together than for it to be some actual active flying machine.

not visible to people on the ground (as literally said in your tweet)

The problem being that it happened at night, and the people on the ground weren't in line of sight with the airborne camera. They can't tell from the camera how far away the object is or how far off the ground it is, so they easily might have been looking for it in the wrong place.

Once again, since my primary theory is that this is just some shyt hanging from the camera housing, the fact that no one on the ground saw anything in the air kills your theory more than mine.

 

[jaydawg08]

I already pointed out that something hanging from the camera housing is more likely than balloons, and you ignored that. You also ignored the witness from the base who said he thinks it was something hanging from the housing too. He said he believes in alien visitations himself, but he thinks this object was just some regular shyt.

And the stationary nature of the object kills your theory more than mine. Why the fukk would some sort of alien flying craft be shaped so strangely, yet have every single aspect of that shape be completely stationary and just floating along unmoving the entire time? It makes MUCH more sense for that to be the characteristics of a bunch of balloons tied together than for it to be some actual active flying machine.





The problem being that it happened at night, and the people on the ground weren't in line of sight with the airborne camera. They can't tell from the camera how far away the object is or how far off the ground it is, so they easily might have been looking for it in the wrong place.

Once again, since my primary theory is that this is just some shyt hanging from the camera housing, the fact that no one on the ground saw anything in the air kills your theory more than mine.

And you apparently ignored the comment from him saying that those who actually work and clean that housing unit said no that's not likely.

He even stated there are details on the video that don't allow his theory to work. And that it's too static to be balloons.

I never stated my opinion other than that it's a weird potential object. But the tweet literally states the guys gives his opinion, then follows that up with numerous reasons why it probably isn't that and isn't balloons either lol

Once again.... My theory isn't anything, I've made no declarations on what it is. I don't think it's a balloon, for obvious reasons and the people who clean/work/maintain the damn thing said not likely something on the lense either

 

[Neuromancer]

It's lint.

 

[Orbital-Fetus]

 

[Professor Emeritus]

And you apparently ignored the comment from him saying that those who actually work and clean that housing unit said no that's not likely.

Did you ignore what I said completely?


I'm not talking about the lens getting smudged. I'm talking about a spider shedding its skin, the dead skin hanging from his line which gets stuck on the housing, and then eventually falls off.

How would "the guys who clean the unit" be able to say that's not likely? They're just saying that they didn't notice anything there when they cleaned it.


You're ignoring that the guy who was right there STILL thinks it was most likely just some shyt on the housing, despite what the cleaners said. The theory I'm repeating satisfies both of them.

He even stated there are details on the video that don't allow his theory to work. And that it's too static to be balloons.

Which is why he thinks it's on the housing.

Once again.... My theory isn't anything, I've made no declarations on what it is. I don't think it's a balloon, for obvious reasons and the people who clean/work/maintain the damn thing said not likely something on the lense either

Why do you dismiss "balloons", or "on the lens" immediately based on the tiniest rebuttals, but you haven't dismissed "aliens" yet with the much stronger rebuttals?

And why haven't you addressed the theory I put forth, that it's not on the lens, but on the housing and then fell off. Absolutely nothing you've said so far would debunk that possibility.

 

[Diunx]

Here's some helpful additional information:





So:


1) The claims that it shot up out of the water appear to be false

2) The claims that it is changing temperature appear likely to be false

3) Nothing was visible with the naked eye, which supports the suggestion that it might have been something stuck to the camera housing



I like the theory that it's a spider's moulted skin. Dead skin, probably hanging from a web thread stuck to the top of the lens guard housing, as the operator moves the camera it gives the impression that it's moving across the background when in reality only the camera is moving. At some point it falls off and that's the end of the story.

The dude in the tweet admitted that the actual team in charge of the camera said it was clean and couldn't be anything on the lens.

On the rest he does have a point since Corbell and Knapps sources are unamed so one can't say is his word againts them.

 

[jaydawg08]

Did you ignore what I said completely?


I'm not talking about the lens getting smudged. I'm talking about a spider shedding its skin, the dead skin hanging from his line which gets stuck on the housing, and then eventually falls off.

How would "the guys who clean the unit" be able to say that's not likely? They're just saying that they didn't notice anything there when they cleaned it.


You're ignoring that the guy who was right there STILL thinks it was most likely just some shyt on the housing, despite what the cleaners said. The theory I'm repeating satisfies both of them.






Which is why he thinks it's on the housing.






Why do you dismiss "balloons", or "on the lens" immediately based on the tiniest rebuttals, but you haven't dismissed "aliens" yet with the much stronger rebuttals?

And why haven't you addressed the theory I put forth, that it's not on the lens, but on the housing and then fell off. Absolutely nothing you've said so far would debunk that possibility.

Where did I state it was aliens



Not Balloons cause it's too static, and not a smudge because it does actually move slightly.

Your theory about spider skin is the same level to me as aliens. Does that make you feel better? Lol