Jellyfish UFO's captured on military weapons camera

[AngryBaby]

The object isn't changing its body temperature, the camera is recalibrating during the shot.

This is yet another one of those instances where people are watching the camera settings change and mistakenly believe it's the object that is changing.

You honestly think that wasnt an assessment already made by the military and corbell?

Or do you think rhakim is that dope that he figured out something so basic, that these fools could not lol

How about this, you like bringing up probability, which one is more probable? Forum goer Rhakim being that dope, and military/corbell being this dumb. Or...this concept already being accounted for by the military and Corbell?

You have a weird time admitting you dont know what something is lol

 

[Professor Emeritus]

You honestly think that wasnt an assessment already made by the military and corbell?

Or do you think rhakim is that dope that he figured out something so basic, that these fools could not lol

You like bringing up liklihoods, which one is more likely?

You have a weird time admitting you dont know what something is lol

Corbell is an idiot and a grifter, nothing is too obvious for him to miss.

I'm sure the military already knows that the changes in the darkness/lightness of the object are from the camera recalibrating. Why would you think otherwise? Didn't you see the tweet from the military guy I posted who was there at the base and already gave that explanation?

And regarding the claims of the object "changing temperature" in the video, Cincoski agrees this could simply be the camera adjusting exposure levels. "It's pretty standard to adjust exposure of the sensor to get a better view while tracking an object."

It's fukking obvious when you watch it, the colors change at the EXACT pace of someone fiddling settings around with their camera.

You're the 3rd person in the conversation to miss a basic detail that I already posted from the source. It's like y'all don't even care about the truth, you just want to push your pet theories regardless of the evidence.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

In terms of "your theory can't be shyt because the Pentagon would have already figured it out"....do y'all not remember that we've already been down this path with the Navy videos? Metabunk had clear explanations of those that were already posted within days of the videos first coming out. People here tried to shyt on that and say it couldn't be that simple because the Pentagon wouldn't be tricked so easily. And then came the sources....that showed the Pentagon had already come to the exact same conclusions.

Many Military U.F.O. Reports Are Just Foreign Spying or Airborne Trash (Published 2022)

Forget space aliens or hypersonic technology; classified assessments show that many episodes have ordinary explanations.

www.nytimes.com

One of the videos, referred to as GoFast, appears to show an object moving at immense speed. But an analysis by the military says that is an illusion created by the angle of observation against water. According to Pentagon calculations, the object is moving only about 30 miles per hour.

Another video, known as Gimbal, shows an object that appears to be turning or spinning. Military officials now believe that is the optics of the classified image sensor, designed to help target weapons, make the object appear like it is moving in a strange way.



The military explanations are the EXACT same as what Metabunk already told y'all. But when those videos came out, y'all were saying that the military couldn't explain them, when in reality they could explain them perfectly well and just didn't disclose it cause they don't like disclosing anything.

 

[Why-Fi]

I mean its def not a smudge. The vid has been proven authentic. And the obect in the longer vid was def moving independent of the camera.

Thus this is just a weird thing. I dont get why...unless you know something we dont. What you arent buying?

Some people just dont want to look stupid i think. So they take this defensive position.

I’m not buying alien invasion

I can see that it’s an unidentified aerial phenomenon, I don’t fully question what’s in the video. but it doesn’t mean shyt to me until somebody speaks up and stop all the guessing. especially with all this technology and testing it could be anything. people jump straight to aliens. and I’m not buying it

 

[FukyourFort]

I’m not buying alien invasion

I can see that it’s an unidentified aerial phenomenon, I don’t fully question what’s in the video. but it doesn’t mean shyt to me until somebody speaks up and stop all the guessing. especially with all this technology and testing it could be anything. people jump straight to aliens. and I’m not buying it

No, it's people like you that keep jumping to aliens. We are trying to have a cool discussion and y'all keep derailing it to feel important? Why are y'all even on these topics? Clearly y'all don't care and haven't done the research to contribute to the discussion.

 

[Why-Fi]

No, it's people like you that keep jumping to aliens. We are trying to have a cool discussion and y'all keep derailing it to feel important? Why are y'all even on these topics? Clearly y'all don't care and haven't done the research to contribute to the discussion.

i dont know but thats a nice lil bit of energy towards something you cant change

 

[8WON6]

RUN, OJ

 

[AngryBaby]

Corbell is an idiot and a grifter, nothing is too obvious for him to miss.

I'm sure the military already knows that the changes in the darkness/lightness of the object are from the camera recalibrating. Why would you think otherwise? Didn't you see the tweet from the military guy I posted who was there at the base and already gave that explanation?



It's fukking obvious when you watch it, the colors change at the EXACT pace of someone fiddling settings around with their camera.

You're the 3rd person in the conversation to miss a basic detail that I already posted from the source. It's like y'all don't even care about the truth, you just want to push your pet theories regardless of the evidence.

What was my pet theory Rhakim? I want you to tell me precisely what my "pet theory" was lol you'll ignore this question.

The only one who consistently shows himself in every thread of this nature with an attempt to persuade people of an *exact* explanation of what something is....is you. Not me.

Therefore deductive reasoning would lead anyone with a knack for psychology to assume you are the one with a vested interest in looking at these situations and saying to yourself "How can I disprove this" rather than having any sort of genuine curiosity. Therefore you come off not credible, and having the "agenda".

As for the military guy who gave his opinion, was he actually an officer involved with this filming, is that a statement by the same people that released the video. Or is it a seperate officer giving his own opinion? or just someone on the base who had nothing to do with the release?

Because the spider theory falls apart if the temperature changing aspect is legitimate. You know that. Also if it were a spider casing dangling from something, I'd assume there'd also be wind sway, being that the device was moving. It wouldnt be still like that.

And so we're assuming corbell didnt consult with the people who filmed this, and manned the actual device then? Because corbell is...an idiot? So we're saying that he just said this was a temp change without. Any consultation. Doesnt seem likely, but if you say hes an idiot..lol


Also, just out of curiosity, since you are a spokesperson for metabunk.

What was their general consensus for this vid with a thing of the same shape.



Has the vid been proven fake? Cgi? Aithentic? Im genuinely curious of your assessment.

 

[Hannibal Fox]

Spoiler

brehs it's this shyt again, It's called The C.A.R.E.T. Program from PACL -- black budget military surveillance thing....they been photographed since 2007 -- they use exotic earth frequencies to just hover around without motors on some 'free energy' shyt. it's a government drone project pretending to be UFOs so taxpayers can't question the government if they don't own up to it, like area 51 since the 50s...if you see one, just shoot it down and figure out how it's made

5 hyperlinks below:

The "CARET" Program - Explanation for Drone UFO Sightings in California

The Mystery of the Drones

Big Basin (CA) Strange Craft High Resolution Photographs

More Big Basin, California, Bizarre "Drone" Images

The Drones and Whitley Strieber

SOHH probably had an OG thread about this thing and people forgot and claim it's some 'new revelation' when it's not. read up, brehs

​	​	​
​	​	​
​	​	​
​	​	​
​	​	​
​	​	​

June 5, 2007-Big Basin by Stephen and other witnesses

​

I have a vague recollection about this

 

[jaydawg08]

The discourse around this is hilarious to me lol. Greenstreet thought he found someone to debunk it..... Instead the opposite

 

[The Realist Perspective]

How the fukk could anyone accuse me of ducking this thread? Y'all make up the most ridiculous lies.







YOU dodged the ban bet, you liar. I accepted the bet within minutes of you posting it.

This was our interaction:











You ghosted the thread at that point.

You offered the ban bet, I took it. The government will not produce a single photo or video of a single alien craft in their possession at any point this year.

Alien craft, you’re seeing it in this thread. The Mexican government showed alien bodies. Get this clown up outta here.

 

[O.T.I.S.]

I’m actually tired of seeing shyt about Jellyfish but as long as yall keep roasting rastafarian @Rhakim , I’m gonna keep reading

 

[Professor Emeritus]

The only one who consistently shows himself in every thread of this nature with an attempt to persuade people of an *exact* explanation of what something is....is you. Not me.

Lying again. I said it could be something hanging from the camera housing, or it could be a bunch of balloons. I never claimed to know exactly what it was, I just said those explanations couldn't be dismissed the way some of you are dismissing them.

Do y'all ever get tired of needing to tell blatant lies in order to force your views?



I notice how you haven't even addressed the part where you lied about me claiming I made up this theory and your false claims that the military couldn't figure it out themselves.

 

[AngryBaby]

Lying again. I said it could be something hanging from the camera housing, or it could be a bunch of balloons. I never claimed to know exactly what it was, I just said those explanations couldn't be dismissed the way some of you are dismissing them.

Do y'all ever get tired of needing to tell blatant lies in order to force your views?



I notice how you haven't even addressed the part where you lied about me claiming I made up this theory and your false claims that the military couldn't figure it out themselves.

What are my "views" Rhakim? Lol I already asked you to tell me what my views are in the above post, just because we see that you go into these threads with bad faith arguments with one singular postion every single time...doesn't automatically mean I have a viewpoint to "force".

Pretty psychotic mindset tbh.

And you mocked people in this very thread for not believing the spider theory or thinking it makes any sense. They didnt even claim it was aliens, yet you got defensive because they didnt feel your explanation made any sense. So dont sit here and pretend you came at this from a neutral perspective with simple suggestions lol

I notice how you haven't even addressed the part where you lied about me claiming I made up this theory and your false claims that the military couldn't figure it out themselves.

The military hasn't figured it out themselves. The video is still passed around by them to this very day. In fact michael cincoski, a marine for that very base spoke on it.



So why did you bring up one military person from the base, and not this one?

Ill tell you why, because you are manipulative and arguing in bad faith. OR, you didnt know, because you're literally searching for information that exclusively debunks it.

Also, about the spider theory. Is this a spider casing hanging from a web on a housing that is outside? Wouldnt there be sway or moving from this spider dangling from a moving apparatus OUTDOORS and in the sky?

 

[AngryBaby]

And @Rhakim. As a side note. I am genuinely curious about your thoughts on that video i posted, the mexican one. I have no idea and im more than open to it being fake or Cgi if that can objectively be proven.

If you have no real take on it, then you jave to admit that shyt is odd.