That's a result of Divorce and disagreements. It's better for a child to grow up this way that in a house where the parents are constantly arguing and fighting.That's my opinion.
so why are you questioning this?Only paying child support and seeing your kids once a wk max ain't much parenting
What I said ain't really a black thing it's a single dad thing. A lot of men only see their kids like once a week or during the weekend some less like every other weekend and they are cool with that while if it were the opposite that would rip a lot of mothers apart.Sounds like some bullshyt some cacs would say Data and communities say black fathers are more likely to be in their child's lives more than any other race; so explain that with your stereotypical mush
This thread proves that OP is Dr. jekyll/Mr. Hyde. He makes some great threads, but goes on bizarre, unrelated rants and ravings about the most ridiculous shyt in other threads
Multiple people must use this account.
I didn't have a question. Did u quote me by accident?so why are you questioning this?
So 75 percent of black children are born to single mothers yet most black men are with their children daily.
Im confused.
Scientists say otherwiseOnly paying child support and seeing your kids once a wk max ain't much parenting
i like how you worded that. now time for me to word it correctly.That's making the assumption that all two family homes are in a constant state of dysfunction...
And I need to see studies that say growing up in a house where parents disagreed and worked together on a solution is more harmful than having a part-time parent
are scientist trying to be too smart?Scientists say otherwise
The data is self reported... it is highly improbable that a single father will report that he doesn't see his child every day... And this applies to all males taking the survey.... Not just Black males
i like how you worded that.(Thanks) now time for me to word it correctly.
the real question is this. Should a 2 parent home stay together just for staying together's sake, even if they never work out any solutions to their problems? meaning, they argue and fight ALLLLL THE TIME. not some of the time. The children hear, and see this. The children hear and see their parents demeaning one another aka verbally abusing one another(sometimes it might get physical with either side throwing the first blow). is it still better for a dysfunctional couple to be together For the CHILDREN's sake?
vs two people co-parenting in a sensible manner. not best buds. but the fights are cut down to 10% of the time and the kids dont see or hear most of them.
which scenario is better?
we know good and well the perfect scenario is best. we are not going to ask that question. we're talking about other scenarios.
i'll add a 3rd choice, parents are not co-parenting. but the man is out of the house. he was abusive(verbally or physically ) , he ran all up and around on his wife when they were together. the kids saw pops with other chicks(disrespecting moms). So now they no longer see this play out all the time. and watch their mother ball up in tears because she's being used and abused more or less.
So...is it better to have a crazy mad house of two people vs the mother and children alone?