Yeah Wiggs would be the odd man out considering they have Kuminga in the cut
Unless wiggins continues to improve drastically and Poole regresses offensively and is still bad defensively
It’s A Splash Bros Reunion! Are You Kuminga To The Poole Party? Warriors 2022 Season Thread
- Thread starter Don Homer
- Start date
Yeah Wiggs would be the odd man out considering they have Kuminga in the cut
Unless wiggins continues to improve drastically and Poole regresses offensively and is still bad defensively
I can't agree with that.
Dray brings too much to the table and what he does isn't easily replicated at all.
He was borderline unplayable at times this year because he was so bad offensively
Got 1-2 years left tops as a starting caliber player on a good team
Not saying they will actually get rid of him but if they choose him over Wiggins or Poole beyond the 22-23 season gonna be a massive mistake they gonna regret for a long time
We’ll if he talkin that dumb now might as well ship pool/Weisman/moody/Kuminga off to BK for Durant…
Trade wigs for another allstar and picks
He's not getting the deal he thinks he's getting, TK kinda hinted it at a week or so ago when Draymond was quote tweeting the deadlines for his extension being due.
Exactly.. Not sure what Wiggins would command, hopefully not a max
In my opinion it doesnt make sense to give up Wiggins when he is just entering his prime. Draymond's probably downward from here...gotta get rid of him IMO. A Wiggins, Poole, Kuminga squad could have a lot of potential in 3 years if Wiseman steps up
Last edited:
Ultimately, that's what's gotta happen. It ain't the easiest of conversations, but you can't have the core eating most of the cap as they get older. They gotta start working on a transition plan.
we really gonna see if they're about sacrificing
There isn't any extensive rookie highlights of Kawhi, and I did say, an early version of him(so it's not specifically what he did in his rookie year). T-Mac came into the league pretty much with a refined skillset, it just wasn't utilized as much when he was a rookie. The only real similarities in their games is how athletic and explosive they are, but so are a lot of wings. That's the real lazy analysis here, is that you're looking at their respective games on some picture book shyt., like you see both of them jumping high so they must be the same.you look at tmacs rookie season and you’ll see it’s closer. Youhad to refer to kawhis third year, and even still he was not as polished or quick as Kuminga
I'm looking at how they get their buckets, their skillsets and how they insert themselves into motion offenses (which is what both the Warriors and Spurs offenses are/were). Kawhi and Kuminga are similar in those respects. I don't come away from watching Kuminga and think T-Mac.
It's not serious, which is why I don't know the hell you're coming at me sideways with this nonsense. I'm not wrong - there's a reason why nobody agrees with your comparison.
This is why it's important to understand the comments in their rightful context.
He's an upgraded Wiggins because to this team Steph and Klay are still whom the offensive revolves around, so Kuminga is playing secondary to that (he'll eat off all the attention the aforementioned receive), which is why what he's displayed on offense thus far is an upgrade on what Wiggins is doing, well, he projects to be an upgrade on Wiggins. However, his style of play isn't like Wiggins because he's aggressive and takes high probability shots (Wiggins is quite the opposite), which is why he's comparable to Kawhi: they're both players who're raw offensively, but still find ways to be efficient and effective.
The same high BBIQ plays that Kawhi was making on offense during his formative years is what Kuminga showed this season. A lot of it comes natural for both of them because they're smart, instinctual players, but it's also the fact they're both playing in systems which emphasize those traits. It's why Kuminga really fits this team well because he operates on the same wave-length as those around him. It's why someone like Oubre was a failure in this environment because he was at the other spectrum on that front.
I can see this happening. I think Draymond will be the one that's most ready to leave, but he'll be 34 when his contract ends and I doubt the market for him will be all that high. Definitely not the 25 million he's getting now. Klay I can see offering the warriors a discount considering he basically got paid $35 million a year for doing nothing for 2.5 years. I think he also geniunely wants to stay. Steph give him whatever the fukk he wants, but I also think he's very comfortable here in the bay and will take a discount just so he doesn't have to uproot his family.
nobody is coming at you side ways. grow up. youre the one who called me a "a fukkk nikka" or some shyt. how old are you? one should be allowed to disagree with it being considered "coming at you sideways"There isn't any extensive rookie highlights of Kawhi, and I did say, an early version of him(so it's not specifically what he did in his rookie year). T-Mac came into the league pretty much with a refined skillset, it just wasn't utilized as much when he was a rookie. The only real similarities in their games is how athletic and explosive they are, but so are a lot of wings. That's the real lazy analysis here, is that you're looking at their respective games on some picture book shyt., like you see both of them jumping high so they must be the same.
I'm looking at how they get their buckets, their skillsets and how they insert themselves into motion offenses (which is what both the Warriors and Spurs offenses are/were). Kawhi and Kuminga are similar in those respects. I don't come away from watching Kuminga and think T-Mac.
It's not serious, which is why I don't know the hell you're coming at me sideways with this nonsense. I'm not wrong - there's a reason why nobody agrees with your comparison.
This is why it's important to understand the comments in their rightful context.
He's an upgraded Wiggins because to this team Steph and Klay are still whom the offensive revolves around, so Kuminga is playing secondary to that (he'll eat off all the attention the aforementioned receive), which is why what he's displayed on offense thus far is an upgrade on what Wiggins is doing, well, he projects to be an upgrade on Wiggins. However, his style of play isn't like Wiggins because he's aggressive and takes high probability shots (Wiggins is quite the opposite), which is why he's comparable to Kawhi: they're both players who're raw offensively, but still find ways to be efficient and effective.
The same high BBIQ plays that Kawhi was making on offense during his formative years is what Kuminga showed this season. A lot of it comes natural for both of them because they're smart, instinctual players, but it's also the fact they're both playing in systems which emphasize those traits. It's why Kuminga really fits this team well because he operates on the same wave-length as those around him. It's why someone like Oubre was a failure in this environment because he was at the other spectrum on that front.
this guy is something else Kuminga is nowhere near as raw as Kawhi was and if that's what you think youre simply wrong. Agree to disagree
Last edited:
Chabot College
All Star
Wiggs has been unlocked 
You came out me sideways with this shyt -
"look who's talking up kuminga now. smh
was just saying we shoulda packaged him a month ago"
So yes, you are a fukk nxgga when if you had bothered to pay attention I've been praising him all season long, and even called for him to replace Wiggins when it looked like he was fading in and out of games when Klay returned. What does that bullshyt have to do with Kuminga's game in relation to T-Mac's anyway? You simply wanted to get a shot off for whatever reason.
If you don't like being pressed, next time just stick to the topic/argument.