James Worthy
Superstar
white phosphorous
white phosphorous
The evidence against Osama in other bombings other than him admitting it defeat the point of a trial the guy was bombing places for a good 10-15 years.I guess we should have let him carry on till we caught him.
What does that have to do with 9/11? Cheney already admitted they have no evidence that OBL did it. Even his FBI most wanted list didn't list 9/11 as his crime.
Probably a few million but they weren't a direct result of military action. Pretty minimal if you really think about it.
Osama Bin Laden was in Afghanistan there was intelligence(and he was!).
I'm not sure who was behind 9/11 nor do I care anymore.
Proves the point of you aren't sure and so many Americans aren't either including their officials and yet that same people are gullible to think Muslims did it and this is why it's easy to fool people. If you don't care anymore why bring up your own ignorance?
Yeah. Because WWII had nothing to do with it.
Yeah right Israel doesn't give a dang about those borders! They are going to do whatever they want until Palestine is a distant memory...Cue up the graphic..
Why the League of Nations already existed...
A fifteen nation organization that failed to prevent a world war? When that was it's sole goal? One that could ONLY pass things with a unanimous vote of fifteen? If you think the LoN is anything like the UN, then you need to take a lap.
Read what it was in response to
check your conspiracy at the door.
You mean countries that wanted to go to war to increase mass expansion on their Empires? Those in the LON like the U.S., Britain didn't want to be held down in treaties...they wanted to make their own rules. So League of Nations was disbanded and got a every worse outlook was the U.N. creation as African Nations can't even be in the Security Council or a permanent member. Now if you are helping a nation create genocide on people and you continue to veto it's sanctions or punishment why should you be a permanent or legitimize member?
Pick a fukking argument.
First you say the UN was exclusively made for the US to support Israel. . . which is completely preposterous given the much bigger reason of WWII.
Then you say WWII couldn't possibly have been the reason because the LoN already existed. I pointed out that the LoN was much different from UN and that the UN is structured in a drastically different manner.
Now you're arguing...well I don't even know because it's not English. The bolded section isn't even a sentence. What is " So League of Nations was disbanded and got a every worse outlook was the U.N. creation as African Nations can't even be in the Security Council or a permanent member."
The UN actually deploys peacekeeping forces, which the LoN never did. You want to bytch about the Security Council? The LoN didn't even HAVE a security council, or any body capable of raising forces for that matter. That function alone makes the UN infinitely more worthwhile than the LoN.
Pick a fukking argument.
Wow sounds like you have a hard time understand multiplicities of how things work in the world.
First you say the UN was exclusively made for the US to support Israel. . . which is completely preposterous given the much bigger reason of WWII.
What was the bigger reason of WW2?
Then you say WWII couldn't possibly have been the reason because the LoN already existed. I pointed out that the LoN was much different from UN and that the UN is structured in a drastically different manner.
Wrong again friend you continue to put your version of my story in with what you said.
Now you're arguing...well I don't even know because it's not English. The bolded section isn't even a sentence. What is " So League of Nations was disbanded and got a every worse outlook was the U.N. creation as African Nations can't even be in the Security Council or a permanent member."
When did I go into class asking for your critiquing of my English? You continue to try to insult without actually bringing anything to the table. Noticed I put African Nations in a part of that sentence to get the jist of who is running the U.N. who you think is structured very well.
The UN actually deploys peacekeeping forces, which the LoN never did. You want to bytch about the Security Council? The LoN didn't even HAVE a security council, or any body capable of raising forces for that matter. That function alone makes the UN infinitely more worthwhile than the LoN.
Peacekeeping Forces... What an oxymoron. U.N. selects forces from Nations that it fits will not help to get peace but to escalate the violence and tensions. I don't see there help in the Congo, Libya, Somalia, Haiti, Uganda and many other places including in Gaza
Example: UN-backed troops 'murdering and raping villagers' in Congo | World news | The Guardian
U.N. Haiti peacekeepers face outcry over alleged rape
UN Troops Accused of Sex Crimes Worldwide
I'm going to let you in on the secret. Kingsmen is the laughing stock of this message board. And by laughing stock, I mean no matter what someone's opinion is on an issue, they know he's a retard. I was as astonished as you were the first time I debated him, and I've seen other posters just as bewildered on their first time. I'm not trying to make fun, but I am 100% sure he has some kind of mental disability.
Most people just ignore him.
I'm going to let you in on the secret. Kingsmen is the laughing stock of this message board. And by laughing stock, I mean no matter what someone's opinion is on an issue, they know he's a retard. I was as astonished as you were the first time I debated him, and I've seen other posters just as bewildered on their first time. I'm not trying to make fun, but I am 100% sure he has some kind of mental disability.
Most people just ignore him.