Is Wrestlemania 22 the LEAST memorable mania of the past 15 years?

[Jmare007]

We are due for a good Mania.

28 was

29 was one of the worst ever except for 1 match

30 was

31 was really fun

32 was a fukking abomination. In hindsight that shyt is the WOAT to me because it lasted 6 fukking hours and was fukking horrible. Other Manias may be bad or boring but they do not test your fandom for THAT damn long

33 was I remember having fun the first hour or so and Brock vs Goldberg was dope sprint. But the show had some horrific lows and the main event was bad.

 

[OmegaK2099]

The build up was crazy with Shane vs Shawn on saturday nights main event

 

[NOSaintsFan02]

33 wasn't that good either tbh

This, idk why 32 gets so much flack when 32 was wayyy better than 33.

33 will now go down as one of the most pointless main events in WM history in Roman Reigns, who didn't end up getting any more over, beating The Undertaker, who was suppose to be retiring but lololol he didn't, in a junk ass match.

 

[Straw Hat Luffy]

r=g be saying wild shyt

this not porn bro

 

[prophecypro]

feel like its maybe 27

 

[Crashwd5]

mitb, taker/henry, rey/orton/angle, hbk/vince, edge/foley were all good

Everything else was meh
Outside of the entrances, cena vs hhh was bottom 5 woat wm main event

 

[Crashwd5]

25 26 27 28 29 32 33 were all shyt overall

 

[Osmosis]

25 26 27 28 29 32 33 were all shyt overall

Lol this is actually true though, 30 and 31 might really be the only good Manias of the past decade

 

[CM_Burns]

Shane vs Taker was terrible..the womens match was the best match.

Shane vs Taker was slow, but good. It had by far the best/most interesting storyline, and was the most memorable moment of the night. It told a story too brother. Other than being slow, which is WWE main event style anyways, there was nothing wrong with it.

The women's match was decent, but forgettable. I legit don't remember who won.

 

[Mantis Toboggan M.D.]

mitb, taker/henry, rey/orton/angle, hbk/vince, edge/foley were all good

Everything else was meh
Outside of the entrances, cena vs hhh was bottom 5 woat wm main event

It’s problem was the ending with Cena no selling the sledgehammer and winning with a clearly totally wrong application of his stf where it didn’t even look like any pressure was being applied.

 

[R=G]

Shane vs Taker was slow, but good. It had by far the best/most interesting storyline, and was the most memorable moment of the night. It told a story too brother. Other than being slow, which is WWE main event style anyways, there was nothing wrong with it.

The women's match was decent, but forgettable. I legit don't remember who won.

A spot? That match was a fukking joke. It makes me sick to even recount it to realize I wasted time watching it.

 

[R=G]

Lol this is actually true though, 30 and 31 might really be the only good Manias of the past decade

The ending of WM 28 had the best pinfall pop of any of those shows.

 

[R=G]

r=g be saying wild shyt

this not porn bro

Say what, kiddo? What is wild? I've had to straighten out EVERYONE at this place at some point. Most of u don't even know even what good wrestling looks like..that was proven with all this goofy Cena/Reigns praise over the last 3 years. Here's a clue...kicking out of finishers don't make a match good and that's all they really do

 

[Straw Hat Luffy]

Say what, kiddo? What is wild? I've had to straighten out EVERYONE at this place at some point. Most of u don't even know even what good wrestling looks like..that was proven with all this goofy Cena/Reigns praise over the last 3 years. Here's a clue...kicking out of finishers don't make a match good and that's all they really do

I'm talking about that hbk/taker mania match disrespect

Nobody care about your obsession with not liking Cena/Reigns

 

[R=G]

I'm talking about that hbk/taker mania match disrespect

Nobody care about your obsession with not liking Cena/Reigns

Obsession? The numbers speak for themselves.


fukk that silly ass Taker/Michaels match. shyt was boring as fukk.