Eagles, Ravens, and Packers are great FO who understand their coach's wants.
Not surprising the rb former teams are terribly run.
The eagles were literally 10-1 without saquon this time last year3 RB’s went from shytty teams to playoff teams and are balling and thats a gotcha to analytics
The Ravens were 9-3 at this time otw to the #1 seed.The eagles were literally 10-1 without saquon this time last year
The Eagles were a good team? They lost every game down the stretch, got crushed in their playoff game, both of their coordinators got fired, and the coach almost got fired.It's like when you tell people that Lions, Eagles, and Packers were good teams before they added those backs and the teams that previously had those backs on the roster sucked even with them, it blows their mind.
No proponent of using data in sports has ever said the running game was unimportant.
The Eagles were a good team? They lost every game down the stretch, got crushed in their playoff game, both of their coordinators got fired, and the coach almost got fired.
They had 10 wins at the end of November...and finished with 11 for the season.They won 11 games, how exactly weren’t they a good team? Bad teams don’t win 11 games in the NFL, just doesn’t happen.
This.Technically they weren’t wrong considering their former teams were ass last year on the roster with them and still ass without them.
All 3 went to great situations, so of course they’d be thriving. Individually they wouldn’t be able to do it on their own.