IS LEBRON JAMES A TOP 10 PLAYER?

[Bilz]

CONSIDERING I HAVE A GAY FAMILY MEMBER, IT ACTUALLY MAKES IT EASIER FOR ME TO SEE THROUGH YALL..I'D BET MY LIFE ON U BEING THE BIITCH IN THE RELATIONSHIP BASED ON YOUR BETA BEHAVIOR. NO WONDER YOU HIDE YOUR IDENTITY BEHIND A SCREEN.

I've been noticing that whenever you convince yourself another poster is gay, you start obsessively requesting their pictures

 

[Sccit]

It's funny how every time you are proven wrong, you just yell and scream until you finally fall silent. This time you are going to have to admit you were wrong and that you are stupid. You misused the phrase you phrased incorrectly. You have this stupid notion that you can google your way out of this one. This is just like when you were wrong about the Supreme Court and Jews. in that case, you tried to misquote from webpages that were summarizing the opinion INCORRECTLY. I went to the source and proved you were an idiot who didn't bother reading.

It's the same problem this time around. You are a terrible writer and a lazy idiot who tries to sound smart. You linked a wikipedia explanation of the phrase that alone proved you were wrong.. yet you ignored it and decided to find an inapplicable website. This is just like the Supreme Court and Jews. You can't admit you are wrong :jjjjj:

THIS IS NOTHING LIKE THE SUPREME COURT THING, FUCCBOY .. THAT WAS A MISTAKE ON MY BEHALF WHICH U LATCHED ONTO FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR LIKE THE LIFELESS LOSER U ARE.

IN THIS CASE, U FUCCED UP AND ARE TRYING YOUR HARDEST TO SAVE FACE. WHILE IT WASNT ORIGINALLY (IN THE 1600'S), "BEGS THE QUESTION" IS USED NOWADAYS AS "RAISES THE QUESTION".. "ONE MUST BEG THE QUESTION"="ONE MUST RAISE THE QUESTION" .. TECHNICALLY, ITS WRONG. BUT SO IS "I CAN GIVE A SHIIT LESS" .. THATS STILL HOW ITS USED NOWADAYS, EVEN IN MAJOR PUBLICATIONS.. BUT U ARE SUCH A PETTY NUTRIDING FAGOT THAT U WILL NEVER ADMIT U HAD NO CLUE WHAT U WERE TALKIN BOUT WHEN U FIRST CALLED IT OUT.

 

[Sccit]

here's a hilarious example of how stupid you are and a great example of recursion that I favor.

"Actually, sir, begging the question is a term for a logical fallacy in which the proposition to be proved is assumed in the premise."

This was an "Example" used in your last link. Ironically, your "article" is filled with assertions without foundation (such as "media narrative") that beg actual questions. It is also filled with run on sentences, parenthetical phrases, and the awkward syntax that has everybody convinced you are autistic.

Let me summarize the lessons for you, Elinor.

1. Do not use the phrase "it begs the question" because you do not know how to phrase it and when it applies.
2. Do not write anything longer than 2 sentences.
3. Stop rapping.
4. Have your parents send you to college. Sure you'll be the fat bald weirdo on campus but it'll be worth it for your parents in the long run.

HONESTLY, U HAVE TO BE ONE GIANT COCCSUCKER TO GET THIS WORKED UP OVER A TECHNICALITY.

I WAS JOKIN AT FIRST, BUT THERES NO WAY YOURE STRAIGHT.

ON TOP OF BEIN A PETTY NUTRIDING BIITCH, U ALSO SUCK AT THE LANGUAGE U TRY SO HARD CORRECTING PEOPLE AT.

YOUVE BEEN POSTING SINCE THE SOHH DAYS AND STILL AINT GOT 1 FEATURED THREAD TO UR NAME .. UR ENTIRE FORUM HISTORY HAS BEEN ONE GIANT FAILURE. EVEN LOOKIN AT UR POST HISTORY, ITS FILLED WIT NOTHIN BUT U RIDING THE NUTS OF OTHET POSTERS. KILL YASELF.

*WAITS FOR FAGOT ASS GOATHOMO TO IGNORE MY POINTS N SAY SOMETHIN LIKE "AINT IS GRAMMATICALLY INCORRECT! YOU'RE STUPID", LIKE THE LIFELESS NERD THAT HE IS.

 

[Goatpoacher]

THIS IS NOTHING LIKE THE SUPREME COURT THING, FUCCBOY .. THAT WAS A MISTAKE ON MY BEHALF T.

Took you a year to admit that.

As for the current problem, you have now posted TWO LINKS that shows why you are wrong. But you're too stupid to see it. :jjjjj:

I'll try a different way. Your phrasing "One must beg the question" is completely wrong. Begging the question is a method of questioning a premise without foundation. It is self referential. Your first link explained that.

Your second link, which you DID NOT READ, has variations on begging the question BUT THEY ARE ALL SELF-REFERENTIAL. Even when it says "You beg the question" such a usage is based on a discussion where a premise needs to be questioned.

It's not only ironic that you post 2 links that PROVE YOU ARE WRONG, your entire "article" is filled with assertions that would qualify as "begging the question".

But you are a stupid child so you don't understand the irony :jjjjj:

 

[Goatpoacher]

HONESTLY, U HAVE TO BE ONE GIANT COCCSUCKER TO GET THIS WORKED UP OVER A TECHNICALITY.

I.

As a third grade substitute teacher, you should appreciate the knowledge I impart for free. This is not a "technicality'. It is a complete misuse of the phrase akin to "for all intensive purposes".

Stop trying to be smart. You destroyed the few brain cells you had. You are a stupid, angry, autistic, balding wigger.

:jjjjj:

 

[SpursFanSinceNovember2017]

 

[Sccit]

Took you a year to admit that.

As for the current problem, you have now posted TWO LINKS that shows why you are wrong. But you're too stupid to see it. :jjjjj:

I'll try a different way. Your phrasing "One must beg the question" is completely wrong. Begging the question is a method of questioning a premise without foundation. It is self referential. Your first link explained that.

Your second link, which you DID NOT READ, has variations on begging the question BUT THEY ARE ALL SELF-REFERENTIAL. Even when it says "You beg the question" such a usage is based on a discussion where a premise needs to be questioned.

It's not only ironic that you post 2 links that PROVE YOU ARE WRONG, your entire "article" is filled with assertions that would qualify as "begging the question".

But you are a stupid child so you don't understand the irony :jjjjj:

I UNDERSTAND HOW IT WAS ORIGINALLY INTENDED TO BE USED, DUMBASS.. BUT THATS NOT HOW ITS USED NOWADAYS. THATS NOT EVEN THE REASON U CALLED IT OUT THO ..UR DUMBASS SIMPLY THOUGHT THERE WAS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "IT BEGS THE QUESTION" AND "ONE MUST BEG THE QUESTION"

 

[Sccit]

As a third grade substitute teacher, you should appreciate the knowledge I impart for free. This is not a "technicality'. It is a complete misuse of the phrase akin to "for all intensive purposes".

Stop trying to be smart. You destroyed the few brain cells you had. You are a stupid, angry, autistic, balding wigger.

:jjjjj:

ALL INTENSIVE PURPOSES IS MISWORDING .. NOBODY CREDIBLE USES IT LIKE THAT. BUT I CAN FIND U THOUSANDS OF CREDIBLE PUBLICATIONS THAT USE "BEG THE QUESTION" TO MEAN "RAISE THE QUESTION", WHICH IS THE DEFINITION ITS GAINED OVER TIME. IF U CAN FIND ME ONE PUBLICATION THAT SAYS "ALL INTENSIVE PURPOSES", I WILL RETRACT MY STATEMENT OF U BEIN A DUMB COCCSUCKER.

 

[Sccit]

I've been noticing that whenever you convince yourself another poster is gay, you start obsessively requesting their pictures

IVE NOTICED THAT YOURE A SIDELINE COMMENTATOR WHO ONLY MAKES THREADS WHEN ITS FOR SNITCHING PURPOSES.

 

[Goatpoacher]

ALL INTENSIVE PURPOSES IS MISWORDING .. NOBODY CREDIBLE USES IT LIKE THAT. BUT I CAN FIND U THOUSANDS OF CREDIBLE PUBLICATIONS THAT USE "BEG THE QUESTION" TO MEAN "RAISE THE QUESTION", WHICH IS THE DEFINITION ITS GAINED OVER TIME. IF U CAN FIND ME ONE PUBLICATION THAT SAYS "ALL INTENSIVE PURPOSES", I WILL RETRACT MY STATEMENT OF U BEIN A DUMB COCCSUCKER.

But your phrasing was incorrect, anyway. "One must beg the question" is just meaningless. Your google search had your own article as a top 10 result because that phrasing is wrong.

More than that, it does not apply to what you were trying to say.

However, my favorite part is that your article is full of assertions that do "beg the question". For example, your non-sequitur about "media narrative". "begging the question" is a horrible imprecise term that SHOULD BE AVOIDED by people much smarter than you. Just accept this free lesson and work to improve yourself, Elinor.

 

[Goatpoacher]

I UNDERSTAND HOW IT WAS ORIGINALLY INTENDED TO BE USED, DUMBASS.. BUT THATS NOT HOW ITS USED NOWADAYS. THATS NOT EVEN THE REASON U CALLED IT OUT THO ..UR DUMBASS SIMPLY THOUGHT THERE WAS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "IT BEGS THE QUESTION" AND "ONE MUST BEG THE QUESTION"

"One must beg the question" is flatly wrong. Your assertion that there is a new usage of the term is flatly wrong. It's just like how stupid kids say "supposably" instead of "Supposedly". Just because you can find examples of others making the same mistake, that does not mean it is not a mistake. If we just accept a series of mistaken premises and statements as orthodoxy without any baseline for review, then we all become republicans.

 

[Sccit]

But your phrasing was incorrect, anyway. "One must beg the question" is just meaningless. Your google search had your own article as a top 10 result because that phrasing is wrong.

More than that, it does not apply to what you were trying to say.

However, my favorite part is that your article is full of assertions that do "beg the question". For example, your non-sequitur about "media narrative". "begging the question" is a horrible imprecise term that SHOULD BE AVOIDED by people much smarter than you. Just accept this free lesson and work to improve yourself, Elinor.

"One must beg the question" is flatly wrong. Your assertion that there is a new usage of the term is flatly wrong. It's just like how stupid kids say "supposably" instead of "Supposedly". Just because you can find examples of others making the same mistake, that does not mean it is not a mistake. If we just accept a series of mistaken premises and statements as orthodoxy without any baseline for review, then we all become republicans.

NO, DUMBASS, ITS NOT THE SAME AS SAYING "SUPPOSABLY" .. U WONT FIND PUBLICATIONS THAT PRINT "SUPPOSABLY".. HOWEVER, U WILL FIND COUNTLESS PUBLICATIONS THAT USE THE TERM "BEGGING THE QUESTION" INTERCHANGEABLY WITH "RAISING THE QUESTION".. THE REASON BEING THAT ENGLISH PHRASES TEND TO CHANGE MEANING OVER TIME. THE WORD AWFUL IS ALSO TECHNICALLY USED WRONG.. IF U LOOK AT HISTORY, ITS ORIGINAL USE WAS "WORTHY OF AWE".. BUT OVER TIME, FOLKS STARTED USING IT TO DECSRIBE THINGS SUCH AS THE QUALITY OF YOUR FORUM HISTORY. TECHNICALLY, THAT MAKES NO SENSE, BUT WORDS AND PHRASES THAT MAKE NO SENSE BECOME CUSTOM ALL THE TIME.

ENGLISH 101

 

[Goatpoacher]

NO, DUMBASS, ITS NOT THE SAME AS SAYING "SUPPOSABLY" .. U WONT FIND PUBLICATIONS THAT PRINT "SUPPOSABLY".. HOWEVER, U WILL FIND COUNTLESS PUBLICATIONS THAT USE THE TERM "BEGGING THE QUESTION" INTERCHANGEABLY WITH "RAISING THE QUESTION"..

But you used it wrong and admitted as much. :jjjjj:

You are also wrong about "publications" misusing the phrase the same way you did. Once again: Your google search showed your own article (reposted) as a top 10 result

 

[Sccit]

YOU ALSO TRYIN EXTRA HARD TO SOUND SMART, BUT UR GRAMMAR AND PUNCTUATION IS "AWFUL"

 

[Sccit]

GOOGLE SEARCH "IS LEBRON JAMES A TOP 10 PLAYER" AND MY ARTICLE COMES UP ON TOP .. THATS BECAUSE THE WEBSITE WHO JACKED MY ARTICLE IS HUGE. SEARCH RESULTS ALSO SHOW MORE RECENT WORK ON TOP .. THATS WHY MY USE OF IT COMES ON TOP OF CNBC, HUFFINGTON POST, BLEACHER REPORT, ETC

DUMBASS