Is it me or does High Learning have dumber posters than The Locker Room?

[Low End Derrick]

WHAT OP ACTUALLY MEANS:

DUMBER POSTERS = POSTERS WHO HAVE OPPOSING POLITICAL VIEWS TO MINE

 

[Professor Emeritus]

OP saying this while he has a TLR thread so bad that he ended up retitling it "the effects of a failed education system"

If you want to see the effects of a failed education system, look no further than this thread

It’s a gotdamn shame :snoop:

www.thecoli.com

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Revenge of the nerd shyt in there. Fraternity of dorks. Gatekeepers. Think they know everything but really just liberal parrots.

You're the guy who tried to claim that Sri Lanka's right-wing leader was a liberal because the country's name had "socialist" in the title.


You also said that Duterte's death squads, Pol Pot's genocide and the Rwandan massacre were great things for their nations but that women make terrible leaders and shouldn't be allowed in government.



Pol Pot's genocide and the Rwandan genocide were great for their countries

Woman make terrible leaders and should not be allowed to be in politics

 

[Mowgli]

You're the guy who tried to claim that Sri Lanka's right-wing leader was a liberal because the country's name had "socialist" in the title.


You also said that Duterte's death squads, Pol Pot's genocide and the Rwandan massacre were great things for their nations but that women make terrible leaders and shouldn't be allowed in government.



Pol Pot's genocide and the Rwandan genocide were great for their countries

Woman make terrible leaders and should not be allowed to be in politics

This is the problem with KTL and why it's a ghost town. Liberal idiots just make up their own interpretations of posts so they don't have to compete intellectually. Combined with moderation bias, it's a cess pool of intellectualism.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

This is the problem with KTL and why it's a ghost town. Liberal idiots just make up their own interpretations of posts so they don't have to compete intellectually. Combined with moderation bias, it's a cess pool of intellectualism.

Let's look at the actual posts:

Here's the argument where you (a right-winger who calls Biden "Jim Crow Joe" because of his drug laws) somehow claimed that Duterte's far more violent war on drugs with literal death squads killing thousands of regular poor folk on the streets was a great thing......and you supported that argument by claiming that genocides and fascist dictatorships improve their countries:

The phillipines will be stabilized at that rate.

Let the dog do the demonic work.

When you don't have the resources to enforce laws you just kill the bad guys until their numbers are low enough to manage in a more peaceful manner.

Is there a problem?

When all or enough of your enemies are dead or terrified you can begin to guide your nation in a way you see fit.

Seems to be the penchant of most so called great leaders.

The mass murderer Lenin as well

Once pol pot killed all his enemies and was out of office gdp rose

Europe during ww2
China during the cultural revolution
Rwandan genocide.


All gdps rose significantly after mayhem.

What poor country did you live in and I'll point out a genocide that got them on track or toppled their stability.

The US is a great example.

They had enemies they killed them

The Chinese had rampant drug addicts and a factions of thought. One side killed the other and git then on track.

Every prosperous nation in South America slaughtered millions for stability.

I'm going to chalk up your naive thinking to youth and a lack of interest in history books or Wikipedia

And here are your posts claiming that women shouldn't be allowed in leadership:

A bunch of women being advised by men....
Hopefully they don't bring that madness over here.

I don't hate women I just don't believe in female leadership at certain levels.

They aren't forward thinkers. They live in the moment. They are easily spooked and can be easily manipulated by advisers because of their caring nature and really they don't really run anything since they're in the pocket of a man at some point in the chain. This nature can cause them to make drastic decisions that hurt the people down the road. They are also often set up to fail and pushed onto a glass cliff. To be the fall girl for bad policy. It's pointless.

In general though it looks like you hardly want women around anywhere:

Women need two things

A man
A kid

To have a compkete life. Don't give a shyt what they say.

Because women want white versions of their respective ethnic relationships.

This is why women put white standards of success on their men even though the men are under the thumb of systematic racism.

The post clearly resonates with men on the coli.

We've all dealt with a hard headed fatty who refuses to take her appearance and health seriously.

Maybe ur next pal. Better watch out. Biggie biggie biggie can't you see, somehow the cookies hypnotized you...

Women love low blows when they're mad.

Women are self motivated

A married woman is a fat ass who's constantly having to be motivated by her man to pull herself together not the other way around.

nikkas turn into dieticians and fitness gurus trying to motivate wifey.

Then soon as she's back in the market, she finds the spark she needed. It's pitiful

Women are already a headache

A fat headache amplifies those frustrations

Women stay fat to spite their husbands and get skinny for some new dikk

The only thing that motivates women alot of times is something new.

That's why they're in it to win it until they meet their goals in a relationship with. ( Marriage, time, kids)

Weight loss is how they go fishing for men.

Pathetic

She didnt have the will to make her marriage better which is why she was cheating on her husband

How about your "number gymnastics" comment, so blockheaded that the response "There's no way you are this retarded breh no way" got 89 daps.

 

[LuuqMaan]

.

"Hitler and Jesse Owens were down with each other"

Legit made me spit my water out

 

[African Peasant]

Yep.

A lot of pretentious MSBNC watchers with reedit tier type of hot takes thinking they deep.

There are some exception, but it's mostly trash.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Legit made me spit my water out

That idiot finally got banned. No idea how it took this long cause he's a right-wing extremist who has been carrying water for Nazis and Confederates for years now. And I'm not even talking modern day fascists like some of the others in this thread, weirdo was always throwing on the cape for LITERAL 1860s confederates and Hitler himself whenever he could.

A lot of right-wing TLR shytposters have been catching the permaban recent though. I figure that's what got some of the commenters in this thread so mad, they worried they next.

 

[Sad Bunny]

TLR might be the most unintelligent group of people in forum history.

 

[Vandelay]

It can be a bit pretentious over there, but in general it's informed conversation without the hostility like TLR.

 

[Pressure]

I'm not even going to troll @Rhakim in HL today. He's got his foot on y'alls neck in here

 

[Mowgli]

Let's look at the actual posts:

Here's the argument where you (a right-winger who calls Biden "Jim Crow Joe" because of his drug laws) somehow claimed that Duterte's far more violent war on drugs with literal death squads killing thousands of regular poor folk on the streets was a great thing......and you supported that argument by claiming that genocides and fascist dictatorships improve their countries:










And here are your posts claiming that women shouldn't be allowed in leadership:






In general though it looks like you hardly want women around anywhere:















How about your "number gymnastics" comment, so blockheaded that the response "There's no way you are this retarded breh no way" got 89 daps.

It's the worst main forum in the site for a reason. It's not because it's guarded by the best brains in the business. It's because you're a bunch of annoying circle jerking clowns that want to be the gatekeepers of information and ideology.

You aren't hip-hop.

 

[Gritsngravy]

What I find funny is that higher learning has almost the same exact thread vice versa talking bad about tlr

 

[bourgeoisie tall freak]

nah in the locker room, poster can barely bother to read past a headline before jumping out the window with logical fallacies

 

[Professor Emeritus]

What I find funny is that higher learning has almost the same exact thread vice versa talking bad about tlr

Except the HL thread is almost entirely composed of links and quotes. You know, actual receipts. And most of them are pretty funny.

Outside of OP linking himself getting owned, was there a single piece of evidence against HL in this entire thread? It's 30% people hating on HL without being able to link a single receipt and 70% posters making fun of OP and the rest of TLR.