*clears throat*
Good evening people of the Coli. Youre an empowered people of privilege and self-rightousness. Today, I am here on behalf of William Bassington, who is also a dear friend of my mine. To quote the great Thomas Fuller, "You cannot judge a man, until you know his full story". Simply put, yall nikkas judging William on an act, without understanding the motives behind them. Yes indeed, the defense has brought incriminating evidence to the table, but do the motives behind the acts not hold any value?...
let me show yall a few things
is that NOT Martin Lawrence? Surely Mr. Lawrence would suffer the same damning accusations as my client. He didnt.
*takes 1 step forward*
Is that not another famous male, dressed 10x worst than my client. SURELY, he would suffer the same accussations as William. He didnt.
*takes another step*
To my people of no color, Im sure you guys can relate to this one.
TELL ME THATS NOT ANOTHER MALE THAT HAS IDENTICAL EVIDENCE AS MY CLIENT, BUT YOU PEOPLE SAID NOTHING.
The defense never wanted to consider the motives and details is what i'm telling you. Quite frankly, the defense KNEW *slams hand on table* the reason my client was dressed in that way. They KNEW. They KNEW he lost a bet, yet these people ignore it and assume. For that, I accuse the defense of knowingly and actively engaging my client into a situation of dishonesty and ENTRAPMENT. The claims of the defense only hold true when observing the evidence, which is PURELY circumstantial. Let me tell you, Ive been around the guy, and there is not one instance where I as another male found him guilty of the claims the defense is throwing out.
My client William Bassington, is entitled to an acquittal of all counts of First degree Homosexuality.