I'm Sorry, I Just Could Never Marry A Woman With More Than 5 Bodies On Her
- Thread starter LogicFirst
- Start date
The fatherless generation right here brehs, men to scared and puzzy whipped to hold women accountable.
A woman that has only been with 3 men but have say screwed them all 100 times is still much purer than a chick who has slept with 300 men once.
Sexual soul ties and emotional bonding.
You have a company looking for a CFO are you going to hire the person with 50 jobs in a 15 year span or the person with a few jobs who do you think will be more loyal to the company
As I said before there are ways, the way she dresses, carries herself, if she's from a two parent household, the type of friends and people she associates with, how she holds her liquor, the environments she hangs around, If she respects her parents. Her relationship history and lengths, social media. If she has a good name all of these ans more will help you estimate the level of whoredom your dealing witg
havoc
Superstar
You should check out Jane Doe Alley, breh. The forum is lot juicier than the Confession section.breh.....
some of the shyt ive read over there....nikkas hearts would be broken....
if women werent naturally ashamed of their body count, they wouldnt lie or omit their real numbers
What do you mean? I wouldn't marry a chick who is a virgin. I've done that before, I was married 3 years. I'm a hoe and trif and I was young.. and that shyt didn't work.
I don't want a certified hoe. But experience helps both the men and women to know exactly what they want.
So you'd marry for love.... so that if you find a bytch... that you don't even wanna refer to as a bytch w your boys, has a career, money , education, slim shape, loves to cook, stays sexy, and can submit to a man without feeling degraded..........
then marry her if that's the type of women you like.
Jesus Shuttlesworth
I Got Game
I genuinely feel sorry for some of yall dudes.
But I guess it's like they say, live by the sword die by the sword. Some of you have put yourselves in dark places so negativity is all you're gonna get.
If 5 bodies or less is unfathomable to you then your entire existence has been poisoned, corrupted and diseased.
But I guess it's like they say, live by the sword die by the sword. Some of you have put yourselves in dark places so negativity is all you're gonna get.
If 5 bodies or less is unfathomable to you then your entire existence has been poisoned, corrupted and diseased.
Goat poster
KANG LIFE
I agree that these are all things a person should look at when deciding to get serious with someone they could potentially marry....
What makes you nikkas that are spouting this numbers rhetoric so delusional though is you think you can throw out some arbitrary number like 2,4, or 5 and have that number mean anything.
There is NO full proof plan to know someones actual body count. So why try and place emphasis on it?
Goat poster
KANG LIFE
I genuinely feel sorry for some of yall dudes.
But I guess it's like they say, live by the sword die by the sword. Some of you have put yourselves in dark places so negativity is all you're gonna get.
If 5 bodies or less is unfathomable to you then your entire existence has been poisoned, corrupted and diseased.
These dudes are worse than the guys on those PUA and body building forums man...
Pure insecurity
LogicFirst
Banned
Link?You should check out Jane Doe Alley, breh. The forum is lot juicier than the Confession section.
LogicFirst
Banned
You just have low standards because you have low self esteemThese dudes are worse than the guys on those PUA and body building forums man...
Pure insecurity
LogicFirst
Banned
What's the difference between wanting a super pretty woman and wanting a low body count? We all want what we wantI genuinely feel sorry for some of yall dudes.
But I guess it's like they say, live by the sword die by the sword. Some of you have put yourselves in dark places so negativity is all you're gonna get.
If 5 bodies or less is unfathomable to you then your entire existence has been poisoned, corrupted and diseased.
I'm all for @Emperor_ReinScarf sexual sole ties theory.
If I inquire about a women's sexual history--I'm not gonna ask about a number--she can answer it one or two ways;
What I can't live with is;
No, ma'am, the past matter very much.
If you don't want to be judged, solely, by your sexual history and don't think I know you well enough to separate you from your mistakes, I understand.
But, it's illogical to believe that the past doesn't matter.
You learned to walk, as an infant. That event, years ago, informs your current lifestyle.
But, I feel we boil a woman's value all the way down to something as archaic as "her number."
And it's as if nothing else trumps it
And we also get a pass on "our number."
While we claim women don't use logic, the entire "it's not the same when men do it" relies on pretty filmsy logic, also.
And, while we define women (who are sexually active) as whores...
And, we and agree whores don't deserve kings, or whatever...
We completely exonerate our own sexual history and believe we "deserve" a virgin...
We used logic like; men can have sex with 100 women and fell nothing...
As if being a sociopath is what's hot in the streets...
We refer to our penises as golden master keys...
And vaginas a flimsy locks that can't take much unlocking...
This forum is strongly against marriage...
Don't hit me with that paperwork nonsense. The majority of women want paperwork and most of us ain't special cases to skip it...
We demean women who wait...
We claim they hold too much value to sex...
Yet, that's a biggest thing we use to judge them...
Basically, because we're telling women;
If I inquire about a women's sexual history--I'm not gonna ask about a number--she can answer it one or two ways;
- Well, <then proceed to explain>
- I don't feel comfortable telling you. I don't want to be judged by the men of my past.
What I can't live with is;
3. It shouldn't matter, the past is the past.
If you don't want to be judged, solely, by your sexual history and don't think I know you well enough to separate you from your mistakes, I understand.
But, it's illogical to believe that the past doesn't matter.
You learned to walk, as an infant. That event, years ago, informs your current lifestyle.
But, I feel we boil a woman's value all the way down to something as archaic as "her number."
And it's as if nothing else trumps it
And we also get a pass on "our number."
While we claim women don't use logic, the entire "it's not the same when men do it" relies on pretty filmsy logic, also.
Because we equate being a whore to being sexually active...Some of us don't want whores to wife up, what's hard to understand? :dahellbill:
Personally, anything over than 0 isstatus
And, while we define women (who are sexually active) as whores...
And, we and agree whores don't deserve kings, or whatever...
We completely exonerate our own sexual history and believe we "deserve" a virgin...
We used logic like; men can have sex with 100 women and fell nothing...
As if being a sociopath is what's hot in the streets...
We refer to our penises as golden master keys...
And vaginas a flimsy locks that can't take much unlocking...
This forum is strongly against marriage...
Don't hit me with that paperwork nonsense. The majority of women want paperwork and most of us ain't special cases to skip it...
We demean women who wait...
We claim they hold too much value to sex...
Yet, that's a biggest thing we use to judge them...
Basically, because we're telling women;
Here's the double standard...don't question it--live by it. 
I agree about the double standard and "manwhores" have no right to deserve virgin and pure girls. But all that shyt has nthing to do with me breh