im sorry but Jared Leto winning an oscar for playing a tranny is robbery
- Thread starter the cool
- Start date
Oh, here we go again with the Colispiracies.
Stating the obvious is a conspiracy now?
Let's make a thread on how some people in seedy circles are saying grass might actually be....green!
With that said despite there obviously being an agenda at play, if the guy did a good job he deserved it. I never saw the film, but once I saw a guy was up for it who played a tranny, my money was immediately on him.
Holy shyt lmao!
TheGodling
Los Ingobernables de Sala de Cine
If there really was a gay agenda, then why did only the actors take home any awards? The film itself didn't win jack so how does that work? Did 12 Years win Best Picture because of the black agenda? Did Cuaron get Best Director because of the space agenda? Why is it that only homosexuality is part of some agenda and nothing else?
Personally I wouldve given it to Fassbender...dude went straight psycho on that role and he finna start getting awards any day now....But I aint mad Leto got it he did a good job. I dont think he deserved to sweep every award out there but thats usually how it works. What I really dont understand is how the fukk Daniel Bruhl got ZERO love for Rush. Dude killed that role
Never said there weren't plenty of agendas at play in the world. I also never said the gay agenda was even necessarily a bad thing. That entirely depends on your own opinions and beliefs, but to deny its existence in 2014 is flat out ridiculous. We got gay people getting married during the Grammy's while Macklemore performs "Same Love" but there's no agenda at hand? Please, don't insult your own intelligence friend.
I'm not saying Leto won because he played a Tranny. Never even saw the film. Maybe he truly deserved it. All I said is once I heard a man playing a tranny was up for an award that my money was immediately on him to win, and sure enough, he did.
That person would be an idiot.
The agenda at hand when gay people are getting married during the Grammy's is profit. Don't underestimate the abilities of corporations to co-opt certain things if they stand a chance to make some money off it.
And again I don't know where people are getting these ideas that cross-gender or dressing acting is an instant Oscar win. Tootsie was a comedy and the only other notable instance (probably the only one) was Boys Don't Cry.
corporations doing things for profit is now a more absurd idea than a gay agenda, i guess
TheGodling
Los Ingobernables de Sala de Cine
You can't say shyt like "Oh, my money was on him since I heard he played a tranny" and play off his win like it's part of some gay agenda, then saying you haven't seen it and maybe he really deserved it. If he deserved it, his win had nothing to do with an agenda. Since you didn't see his performance, you can't even judge on it. So any implication that there was some agenda at work with his win is pure speculation on your part with nothing to support it.
You can't say shyt like "Oh, my money was on him since I heard he played a tranny" and play off his win like it's part of some gay agenda, then saying you haven't seen it and maybe he really deserved it. If he deserved it, his win had nothing to do with an agenda. Since you didn't see his performance, you can't even judge on it. So any implication that there was some agenda at work with his win is pure speculation on your part with nothing to support it.
Didn't say his win was a part of the gay agenda. Wouldn't surprise me though. If you scroll up, you'll see I directly responded to you saying the gay agenda is a "colipricacy". Nothing more or less. If he did a good job, he deserves it - agenda or no agenda, but once I saw he was up for it and the role he played, my money was on him winning - hammy acceptance speech for the icing on top.
Neither are absurd. Both being in play simultaneously makes the most sense. The Grammy's gay marriage extravaganza was just one example. There are tons upon tons of other examples - in television, movies, advertisements, music, and obviously in the civil rights movement taking place. If you want to chalk that all up to just being a money grab, go right ahead breh. Do you. At least you're reasonable enough to acknowledge there's at least SOME sort of agenda at play. I can respect that a lot more.
So fukking true. I've never really seen it done any other way, word to Hattie McDaniel. And even if you don't win the Oscar there's a SAG or Golden Globe waiting in the wings for you.
That's Macklemore pandering to the gay community than a "gay agenda" more than anything.
LastManStanding
Veteran
Leto has received tons of heat from gay and transgender groups/organizations because he didn't thank them in his acceptance speech.
I say good for him for not bowing down and being "politically correct" and not making his speech about a sexual agenda.
dude took the role and did his thing. now they mad.
Jared Leto's Oscar Win For 'Dallas Buyers Club' Criticized By Transgender Community
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/03/jared-leto-oscar-transgender_n_4890061.html
Jared Leto Wins Oscar for Transgender Role, Gets Criticized by Transgender Community
http://www.contactmusic.com/article...aller-buyers-club-oscars-2014-winners_4096784
I say good for him for not bowing down and being "politically correct" and not making his speech about a sexual agenda.
dude took the role and did his thing. now they mad.
Jared Leto's Oscar Win For 'Dallas Buyers Club' Criticized By Transgender Community
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/03/jared-leto-oscar-transgender_n_4890061.html
Jared Leto Wins Oscar for Transgender Role, Gets Criticized by Transgender Community
http://www.contactmusic.com/article...aller-buyers-club-oscars-2014-winners_4096784
Last edited: