Olsteen is a pos. I remember how he refused to offer his church as a shelter for people when that deep freeze happened a few years ago. I would have took all that shyt
In fairness i think there are laws against churches being used as shelters. (thank the treat the homeless as the enemy crowd)Joel Osteen faces criticism on social media for closing Houston megachurch's doors amid Harvey
Ten of thousands of people are expected to need shelter in the area because of flooding.abcnews.go.com
F*ck Joel Olsteen and his "church".
Fred.
In fairness i think there are laws against churches being used as shelters. (thank the treat the homeless as the enemy crowd)
And considering how wealthy and high profile his church is, they absolutely would've tried to take him for everything he has had he opened up.
There is a long history of pastors trying to shelter the homeless in churches and getting shut down or penalized by cities for it.
a smaller church might be able to get away with it, but not him. I beat his lawyers expressly told him to keep those doors closed.Could helping the homeless get you criminal charges? More churches getting in trouble
Religious leaders say they have a right to help people in need, but more churches are coming under fire from local authorities.www.usatoday.com
He still pointed out that he was only doing it if the city shelters reached capacity. Obviously trying to save face. but that particular language pretty much confirms to me he was worried about liability. Probably should have been transparent about it from the beginning rather than making up excuses about being damaged, but this low key confirms he was trying to avoid legal liability.He eventually sheltered people after receiving back lash:
Loading…
www.cnn.com
So nah, he obviously knew he f*cked up. If he gave the reasons you said it would be a different story. Dude came out the gate lying about his church was damaged due to flooding. Which promptly got exposed as bullsh*t on social media. Then he decided to help people.
Fred.
He still pointed out that he was only doing it if the city shelters reached capacity. Obviously trying to save face. but that particular language pretty much confirms to me he was worried about liability. Probably should have been transparent about it from the beginning rather than making up excuses about being damaged, but this low key confirms he was trying to avoid legal liability.
You doing work. You bag and carry out debris and tools. I did work like that. It wouldn't be hardThe hardest part would be trying to make it out the Church.
Light workThe hardest part would be trying to make it out the Church.