If You Think Cosby Did It, c00ns Come Here And Defend This (women's Backgrounds)

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,696
Daps
203,904
Reppin
the ether
Damn OP! 11 down only like 30 more to go! Keep up the good work.

:snoop:


Most like 45 more now.

:stopitslime:This the same shyt white racists use to make black people seem "less human" or "deserved" of f. Ex police killings

"he was arrested for weed once and sold loose cigs you know!! Ni**er deserved what he got!"

No shyt - this is the stuff they just tried with Daniel Holtzclaw. EVERY one of those women had a long record, and they tried to shyt on all of them. One woman was even proven to have made her whole story up. Did that mean the others were lying?

Holtzclaw's case: 13 out of 13 women with records and one lying through her teeth: still guilty.

Cosby case: 5 out of 50 women with records and 2-3 others probably lying: "Oh, he must be innocent then!"

Ya'alls logic is stupid as fukk.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,696
Daps
203,904
Reppin
the ether
Here's an exchange that I still haven't heard any of Cosby's defenders explain away:

“Did he know when he gave you those prescriptions that you had no intention of taking them?” a lawyer asked Cosby in the 2005 deposition.

“Yes,” the entertainer replied.

“Did you believe at that time that it was illegal for you to dispense those drugs?”

“Yes,” Cosby answered.

"When you got the Quaaludes, was it in your mind that you were going to use these Quaaludes for young women that you wanted to have sex with?" Troiani asked.

"Yes," Cosby replied.

"Did you ever give any of those young women the Quaaludes without their knowledge?" Troiani asked.

Cosby's attorney objected and told him not to answer the question.

:ohhh:



Bill Cosby was getting Quaaludes over and over for 30+ years (established fact), illegally from a gynecologist (established fact), when he didn't intend them for his own use (established fact), and then gave them repeatedly to a large variety of different women (established fact).

And his attorney refused to let him answer a question about whether he was giving it to women without their knowledge. :francis:

There are over 50 witnesses testifying that Cosby took advantage of them, his own assistant has testified that Cosby was doing shady shyt with women (he had to guard the door so the woman didn't try to get out), Cosby has 30 years of reciepts for sedatives that he never took himself, and his own testimony in the civil case basically indicted himself.

Even the doctor that was giving the Quaaludes to Cosby almost beat the shyt out of him for how he took advantage of one of the doctor's female friends:

“In her presence, Amar confronted Cosby, almost coming to blows,” the attorney recounts. “He warned Cosby never to do anything like that again to Green.”

You have two options.

Either Bill Cosby really liked sex with women who were incapacitated with Quaaludes. :dame:


Or Bill Cosby had the craziest stream of luck meeting dozens of women from the 1960s to the 2000s who just happened to like taking Quaaludes before sex, only they just happened not to have any on their own. Good thing he kept a supply at hand for just such an occasion! :usure:

Which of those two options is it? :comeon:


If this was anyone with less power than Cosby, he'd be in the slammer. How the hell do you expect to get a date rape case with more evidence than this?
 
Last edited:

Shadow King

Quiet N***a Loud Choppa
Supporter
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
42,042
Reputation
3,305
Daps
85,388
Reppin
Hometown of Cherokee at Law
This site need to relax with the word c00n but I been saying he wasn't some damn serial rapist. He was living that same lifestyle as everyone else 40 years ago. He was just the richest and most famous one and pissed off the powers that be by trying to buy into NBC.
 
Last edited:

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,696
Daps
203,904
Reppin
the ether
He did not rape 30+ women. Now if he did rape 1, 2, or 3 women he should suffer the consequences for the women he raped, but not for women he did not rape.


Where the hell does this logic come from? If he was the kind of guy who wanted to date rape, and he could do it without getting caught, then why would he do it just once or twice and then skip 40 years?

You ignoring that he filled at least 8 iillegal prescriptions for Quaaludes over the course of 30+ years?

If he really had rapist inclinations, you really think he waited until he was 65 to commit his first one?

The average rapist in prison has committed 9 rapes before he got caught. Cosby had 50 years between the first rape and when he finally caught charges. You seriously think he was going to hold back and only do it once every ten years?
 

Rakim Allah

Superstar
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
13,252
Reputation
2,202
Daps
22,146
Reppin
Los Angeles
Most like 45 more now.



No shyt - this is the stuff they just tried with Daniel Holtzclaw. EVERY one of those women had a long record, and they tried to shyt on all of them. One woman was even proven to have made her whole story up. Did that mean the others were lying?

Holtzclaw's case: 13 out of 13 women with records and one lying through her teeth: still guilty.

Cosby case: 5 out of 50 women with records and 2-3 others probably lying: "Oh, he must be innocent then!"

Ya'alls logic is stupid as fukk.
DNA evidence did Holtzclaw in. Otherwise he would of got off.
 

agnosticlady

AL loves da kids : )
Joined
Jun 15, 2015
Messages
6,506
Reputation
2,900
Daps
24,616
Where the hell does this logic come from? If he was the kind of guy who wanted to date rape, and he could do it without getting caught, then why would he do it just once or twice and then skip 40 years?

You ignoring that he filled at least 8 iillegal prescriptions for Quaaludes over the course of 30+ years?

If he really had rapist inclinations, you really think he waited until he was 65 to commit his first one?

The average rapist in prison has committed 9 rapes before he got caught. Cosby had 50 years between the first rape and when he finally caught charges. You seriously think he was going to hold back and only do it once every ten years?

Dude just stop. Obviously some of those women are lying. Many of them consented to drug induced sex. If he raped any woman he should suffer for the rape he committed.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,696
Daps
203,904
Reppin
the ether
DNA evidence did Holtzclaw in. Otherwise he would of got off.

He had a small patch of the DNA of ONE of the woman he arrested on his clothes. The DNA expert hired by the prosecution admitted during cross-examination that the DNA could have gotten on Holtzclaw's hands in the normal course of the arrest.

The strong and consistent testimony of 13 victims did him in.

He got convicted of 38 counts relating to 13 women. DNA was only involving with ONE woman, and that DNA didn't come from sexual fluids and didn't show rape in any way. And all the other counts had nothing to do with DNA. That was a minor contributing factor, but it was the testimony that made the case.



Dude just stop. Obviously some of those women are lying. Many of them consented to drug induced sex. If he raped any woman he should suffer for the rape he committed.

It's no more obvious that some are lying than it is obvious that some are telling the truth. A whole lot more than 1 or 2.

This shyt keeps feeling like a fukking Chappelle skit. One side is laying down a shytload of evidence, and the other side just keeps shouting, "It's Cliff Huxtable, he's a family man! Where's the video evidence and his grandma's testimony? Come on, I ain't gonna believe Bill could do all that!"
 
Joined
May 17, 2015
Messages
925
Reputation
60
Daps
1,641
Listen, ignorant ass negroes. If you are contributing to the oppression of ANY group of people in society, you are still an oppressor. Defending Bill Cosby because he was on a good tv show (and because the victims were white) is oppressing women, in general.
 
Top