"If you look at the way these middle school & high school girls dress & carry on... You can see the ones that are potential whores" -- Tariq Nasheed

[staticshock]

Y’all gotta stop this nonsense. If you see a young child dressing up as a grown ass woman there is something going on with that kid upbringing and we all know that kid could turn out to be a fast person.

My nikka I don’t even be looking at female students like that to be pondering about their upbringing.

I see them, say what’s up ask how their day is going and get started with my lesson.

1) who the hell looks at how a 12 year old girl dresses that hard to think about how they’re going to turn out?

2) if any students are dressed inappropriately, they don’t even make it past the main concourse of the school. The folks (mainly older female teachers or administrators) on morning duty in the front of the school & the cafeteria where the kids come in at tell a student to go into the office to sit and call their parents before they even go to 1st period.


There’s no way you can normalize looking at a 11-13 year old girl that hard to say “damn she gonna be a slut when she grows up”. You need to be on a list if you do shyt like that.

 

[RhodyRum]

My nikka I don’t even be looking at female students like that to be pondering about their upbringing.

I see them, say what’s up ask how their day is going and get started with my lesson.

1) who the hell looks at how a 12 year old girl dresses that hard to think about how they’re going to turn out?

2) if any students are dressed inappropriately, they don’t even make it past the main concourse of the school. The folks (mainly older female teachers or administrators) on morning duty in the front of the school & the cafeteria where the kids come in at tell a student to go into the office to sit and call their parents before they even go to 1st period.


There’s no way you can normalize looking at a 11-13 year old girl that hard to say “damn she gonna be a slut when she grows up”. You need to be on a list if you do shyt like that.

It's funny how with all the dikk policing that goes on here with posters trying to shame others for consensual relations with other adults, what flies completely under the radar of the Coli Dikk Police Department is the posters who exhibit tendencies of being into children.

But go on Coli patrol, keep scrutinizing adult business and turn a blind eye to these potential pedophiles who share the same online space wit ya! You're doing a bang up job!

 

[Buddy]

muhfukka said you must have went to private school if you think this is fukked up

 

[karim]

I respect both of yall as posters but this aint it.

When you get down to brass tax, and put things into real-life context, he isn't identifying whores, the vast majority of women he is identifying women likely have unresolved sexual and emotional traumas in their lives. fukking damn near EVERY prostitute in Soft White Underbelly has a story of sexual molestation prior to prostitution.

Yes there are women who like to fukk, but what women needs a pimp as a middle men if they are confident and know how to get what they want in life? Protection is great, but then he should be getting paid 10-15% like an agent, not a 85% like the talent.

He EXPLICITLY states that he is providing financial/emotional support which insinuates that she is lacking in those department (read: she is likely broken which is why she is involved in a fukk nikka like a pimp in the first place)

It's embarrassing reading some Disney cliche of "Only a woman who was already a whore can be turned out". Do you even know what sex trafficking is? I know this is TLR, but this is laughably incorrect. It reminds me of how white ppl act surprised when crime happens in their pristine neighborhood, because their biases refuse to let them see how random and unpredictable danger can be. It's such a myopic way of understanding how the world/prostitution works.




I feel like the gist of your argument is that he isn't glorifying taking advantage of underage girls, only low self-esteem women as if that some type of noble effort or 'all in the game yo'.

At best, its analogous to a shytty record deal where the artist doesn't know their worth, but more often than not, it's analogous with sex trafficking, using violence to keep girls in line, etc. Either way, either course of actions should not be met with this flippant attitude/glorification of a shytty power dynamic.

First of all, I'm not saying I agree with him. Second, he is not talking about sex trafficking, he is talking about pimping. There is a difference. Sex trafficking is forcing woman into prostitution against their will, pimping is not. Once again, I'm not saying I agree with Tariq, but people have a tendency to mix up prostitution with human trafficking even though they're not the same thing. Does human trafficking exist in the sex trade? Yes it does, but it exists in a lot of other areas too and we don't automatically conflate the two. Babies get trafficked for adoption, yet we don't suspect everybody who adopted a child of having engaged in child trafficking. There is tons of human trafficking in manual labor and still, nobody looks at oranges from california and automatically assumes that they've been picked by trafficking victims.

The point Tariq is making is that there is this notion in society that woman only engage in prostitution against their will or because something bad happened to them and that that is not true. Yes, there are broken woman in prostitution, but as @Savvir said, his advice is to avoid them, because they will be trouble. You don't have to agree with him, but my argument is that then you have to debate him on those points and not on something he didn't say.

 

[karim]

Dude really believes his comments being "sexist" and critical of women is the problem here. Pedos all up in this thread for real. I almost wanna exit.

Then exit you apparently lack the reading comprehension to engage in this discussion

 

[Dameon Farrow]

Thread still rolling unbushed

 

[old pig]

I’ve taught at that grade level for over 10 years and never felt the need to predetermine which students would be “whores”…did young ppl push the dress code? absolutely…it’s what some young folks do and they’d be “disciplined” for it accordingly…never used that to label them in any way tho

 

[Antwon Mitchell]

What makes this bad is that he's a grown ass man likely well into his 30s when he wrote this giving out tips on how to vet and pick out the middle and high school girls perceived to be “hoes in the making”.

If you can't see how wrong this is then it's time you need a moral awakening before it's too late and you can't go back.

Nikka sound like he used to park outside across the street from the school(yard) with binoculars taking notes and shyt .

 

[audemarzz]

That fat hungry bytch in here dapping yall posts is a dikk patrol sheriff.

 

[Contrefaire]

I’ve taught at that grade level for over 10 years and never felt the need to predetermine which students would be “whores”…did young ppl push the dress code? absolutely…it’s what some young folks do and they’d be “disciplined” for it accordingly…never used that to label them in any way tho

What's funny is earlier in the thread some posters were saying if you didn't believe this you must have gone to private school or some shyt but in reality, when we were in school we DID see this. Back when I was in jr high in the mid 2000s the trend with the girls was rolling up their shorts at the waist as short as they could go without getting dressed coded and even when they did, they rolled them back down until admin was out of sight and then they rolled them up again. This was also the "whale tail" era so there were tons of girls changing into lowrise jeans in the bathrooms after first period.

But even thinking back on that, at no point would I ever assume "Oh those 12yr olds were trying to be hoes to sexually attract and trick grown men!!" Why even make that leap in logic when it was more than likely those girls were looking to get the attention of their peers? NOT adult men. And this wasn't even on some "there must be trouble at home" shyt, they just wanted to look like the girls they saw on MTV.

 

[old pig]

What's funny is earlier in the thread some posters were saying if you didn't believe this you must have gone to private school or some shyt but in reality, when we were in school we DID see this. Back when I was in jr high in the mid 2000s the trend with the girls was rolling up their shorts at the waist as short as they could go without getting dressed coded and even when they did, they rolled them back down until admin was out of sight and then they rolled them up again. This was also the "whale tail" era so there were tons of girls changing into lowrise jeans in the bathrooms after first period.

But even thinking back on that, at no point would I ever assume "Oh those 12yr olds were trying to be hoes to sexually attract and trick grown men!!" Why even make that leap in logic when it was more than likely those girls were looking to get the attention of their peers? NOT adult men. And this wasn't even on some "there must be trouble at home" shyt, they just wanted to look like the girls they saw on MTV.

it’s basically the equivalent of criminalizing young men for sagging their pants and saying they are potential felons when they’re just following a popular trend (granted I’d still tell them to pull up their pants cuz it’s inappropriate)

 

[Contrefaire]

it’s basically the equivalent of criminalizing young men for sagging their pants and saying they are potential felons when they’re just following a popular trend (granted I’d still tell them to pull up their pants cuz it’s inappropriate)

I started to say this but deleted it because my post was running long but yeah this 100%. I went to middle school in the Tall Tee/big shorts era and finished high school in the skinny jeans era and SOMEHOW both styles got young black boys labeled as dangerous future criminals. It's almost as if anything young black kids do is automatically assumed to be criminal or immoral and a sign of their (bad) character as adults.....

 

[CashmereThoughts]

This is supposedly on page 73 of "The Art of Mackin'. I know one of yall got it, is this true? Did he get his break telling brehs to scout schoolgrounds and malls like a creep?

This the same shyt our mothers was saying about “fast” girls.

 

[kevm3]

This the same shyt our mothers was saying about “fast” girls.

Tariq has fell out of the Coli's favor despite him being one of the Coli father figures in the past. His endorsements of Trump has had him fall out of grace so some are looking for any thing to be mad at him over.

A lot of moms told their sons, "Don't bring those little fast girls over here. I don't want those fast girls calling my phone trying to get into contact with you (before cell phones were prevalent)." Adults judging kids for what they wore is nothing new.

In middle school, if you were dressed in gang colors and throwing up the signs, the adults would most likely have told you that you are headed to jail or the grave, hence the 'judging'. You would get a completely different reaction from campus cops, teachers, and other staff depending on the kind of attire you went to school with.

If a middle school girl is dressed in something skimpy, that's a household/parenting problem, and unfortunately, it's a bat signal to predators to come swoop in and shoot their shot and start the grooming process, which was what Tariq even mentioned in that passage. No parents should be letting their kids go out of the door in skimpy outfits because that increases the probability of predators looking at your kids. It starts at home

 

[Buddy]

This the same shyt our mothers was saying about “fast” girls.

Our mothers were warning us to avoid stds, teenage fatherhood and general fukkery. Tariq is talking about their potential and being a "guiding light/father figure" to them they're not the same unless you think his ass is Madea