"If you look at the way these middle school & high school girls dress & carry on... You can see the ones that are potential whores" -- Tariq Nasheed

[Macallik86]

I respect both of yall as posters but this aint it.

I can't believe I'm definding Tariq Nashid of all people He's not telling them how to identify broken woman. His whole point is that there are woman who are whores and woman who are not.

When you get down to brass tax, and put things into real-life context, he isn't identifying whores, the vast majority of women he is identifying women likely have unresolved sexual and emotional traumas in their lives. fukking damn near EVERY prostitute in Soft White Underbelly has a story of sexual molestation prior to prostitution.

Yes there are women who like to fukk, but what women needs a pimp as a middle men if they are confident and know how to get what they want in life? Protection is great, but then he should be getting paid 10-15% like an agent, not a 85% like the talent.

He EXPLICITLY states that he is providing financial/emotional support which insinuates that she is lacking in those department (read: she is likely broken which is why she is involved in a fukk nikka like a pimp in the first place)

A pimp, no matter what he does, can't turn out a woman who is not a whore. Only a woman who already was a whore before she met the pimp can be turned out. As an example he is then referring to girls in middle school, because that is an age where they have jad no contact with a pimp, but some of them already start dressing provocatively and behaving slutty.

It's embarrassing reading some Disney cliche of "Only a woman who was already a whore can be turned out". Do you even know what sex trafficking is? I know this is TLR, but this is laughably incorrect. It reminds me of how white ppl act surprised when crime happens in their pristine neighborhood, because their biases refuse to let them see how random and unpredictable danger can be. It's such a myopic way of understanding how the world/prostitution works.

The whole thing is not a how to guide, it's a discussion about different mentalities. I'm not saying he is right and of course the whole thing is sexist. But that is not the point of discussion here. The discussion is whether he is telling his readers to exploit underage girls and he is not doing that.

If you want to criticize him for being sexist, do that. If you disagree with him about what he says about female mentalities, make your points. There is more that enough room for critique in those pages, you don't have to make up things that aren't there.

i dont like tariq.. but ive been saying exactly what you're saying this whole time...

just because yall don't like his c00n grift ass....(and I don't either)

doesn't give us the right to willfully misinterpret his actual words

I feel like the gist of your argument is that he isn't glorifying taking advantage of underage girls, only low self-esteem women as if that some type of noble effort or 'all in the game yo'.

At best, its analogous to a shytty record deal where the artist doesn't know their worth, but more often than not, it's analogous with sex trafficking, using violence to keep girls in line, etc. Either way, either course of actions should not be met with this flippant attitude/glorification of a shytty power dynamic.

 

[Savvir]

I feel like the gist of your argument is that he isn't glorifying taking advantage of underage girls, only low self-esteem women as if that some type of noble effort or 'all in the game yo'.

ok we making progress here...

i honestly respect you actually u taking the time to nderstand where I'm coming from..

In the book (since I had to read through to see if my opinion was valid) he speaks on the dynamics of dealing with all types of women...

from "chickenheads" to higher level women who have values and were raised correctly..

he is not advocating specifically for taking advantage of low self worth women...

but he's laying out the dynamics that you will encounter if you decide to..

i mean, he even mentions distancing yourself and not taking them (broken grown women) serious because they can cause issues in your life..

this is necessary info for a man who wants to be able to talk to women...

how can you accurately vet women if you don't understand the dynamics of each type of women?

if a dating book for women mentions low level hood nikkas... and the dynamics that come into play in why/how they approach dating...

would you say that's telling women how to take advantage of low level men?

if the book mentions how low level men tend to be sexualized earlier in life than well raised men

and you can see examples of this early sexualization in middle school and highschool

does that mean it's teaching grown women to abuse boys?

it is all in the game...

but the sensitivity we have for women.. especially underage women...

has led to an instant emotional response that doesn't match what is being said...

that's all

 

[Mowgli]

You see kids assaulting kids similar to adults doing it huh?

Were you abused or are you just trying to get on my nerves? You sure are going left with this and I don't know why.

 

[Genos]

Were you abused or are you just trying to get on my nerves? You sure are going left with this and I don't know why.

You blame everyone but the pedophile for their pedophilia

 

[Jeshaman]

I read that text a few times, trying to give him the benefit of the doubt, but the more i read it the worse it sounds.

He actually insinuates that in most cases, pimps don't prey on women and they are trying to make the best out of a bad situation.

It just gets weirder from there.

 

[Mowgli]

You blame everyone but the pedophile for their pedophilia

Moron. I was talking about conditions in homes that lead to daughters being sexually active

I wasn't itemizing every perp who abuses kids.

 

[Genos]

Moron. I was talking about conditions in homes that lead to daughters being sexually active

I wasn't itemizing every perp who abuses kids.

Confusing being "sexually active" with molestation isn't good

 

[KBtheKey]

Bruh these rebuttals are not the flex you thought they were...

Like, AT ALL

There is no flex. Some of them girls choose to live like that because they think that's a kool thing to do. You can look at social media and see that. I went to middle school with a chick who was "dating" a 22 year old. That's something she voluntarily pursued. She look the same now as she did 15 years ago so i doubt the dude knew

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

he's a mentally ill person as are most of his followers. Lol @ propping up pimps. Clown.

 

[SupaDupaFresh]

I knew some idiot would tell me this, but there are situations where it's possible. One of my patnas people's was out here putting minors on the split and the 2 hoes i seen round em didn't look off limits. Not younger than 16-18 but how they looked and talked was like the typical young grown woman. Johns and simps can get caught up if not cautious

Don't talk shyt if you don't live shyt, bytch

So grown ass "John's and simps" are outside frequenting pimps for teenage looking prostitutes. And you think these are swell guys who's lives was just clean and peachy until exploited teenagers "looking and talking like grown woman" fooled them into sex.

Yall Tariq Nasheed nikkas are fukking SICK. The hit dogs HOLLERIN in this thread man.

 

[RhodyRum]

There is no flex. Some of them girls choose to live like that because they think that's a kool thing to do. You can look at social media and see that. I went to middle school with a chick who was "dating" a 22 year old. That's something she voluntarily pursued. She look the same now as she did 15 years ago so i doubt the dude knew

If only the adult who's legal and moral responsibility it was to, at the very least, reject the advances of a minor (regardless of the intentions and motivations of the minor) could actually be an adult in that moment. Interesting concept huh?

And FOH with that "getting tricked" garbage. Any of these guys that you're choosing to paint as victims of these "Lolitas" knew clear as day what her age was and more than likely reveled in it. No man is that stupid. The only stupid ones are their friends that buy that "I didn't know her age" bull jive.

It's amazing how you'll speak on underaged girls "choosing" to be with older men with an obvious sneer to your tone and seem to have no smoke for the abusers who give those young women a space to act promiscuously.

You keep company with people with disgusting moral compasses and everyone knows about water and the level it seeks. This is some foul ass shıt you're attempting to justify

 

[SupaDupaFresh]

I can't believe I'm definding Tariq Nashid of all people He's not telling them how to identify broken woman. His whole point is that there are woman who are whores and woman who are not. A pimp, no matter what he does, can't turn out a woman who is not a whore. Only a woman who already was a whore before she met the pimp can be turned out. As an example he is then referring to girls in middle school, because that is an age where they have jad no contact with a pimp, but some of them already start dressing provocatively and behaving slutty. The whole thing is not a how to guide, it's a discussion about different mentalities. I'm not saying he is right and of course the whole thing is sexist. But that is not the point of discussion here. The discussion is whether he is telling his readers to exploit underage girls and he is not doing that.

If you want to criticize him for being sexist, do that. If you disagree with him about what he says about female mentalities, make your points. There is more that enough room for critique in those pages, you don't have to make up things that aren't there.

Dude really believes his comments being "sexist" and critical of women is the problem here. Pedos all up in this thread for real. I almost wanna exit.

 

[SupaDupaFresh]

So are you defending underage girls being little hoes because they think it's Kool or because you think it's kool or what

Imagine being a grown man and even having the ability to view underage middle school girls as "little hoes."

I almost vommitted reading this.

 

[KBtheKey]

So grown ass "John's and simps" are outside frequenting pimps for teenage looking prostitutes. And you think these are swell guys who's lives was just clean and peachy until exploited teenagers "looking and talking like grown woman" fooled them into sex.

Yall Tariq Nasheed nikkas are fukking SICK. The hit dogs HOLLERIN in this thread man.

Johns and simps were 2 separate groups, and my main point was i don't like when girls try to grow up too fast because that life they think they living up is not all that good. I don't really care what their parents let them wear within reason but when they want the attitude that comes with all that, you start to see a decline in the current youth culture.

I don't understand how that translates to me thinking minors getting pumped is Kool. I've stated things that I've seen in my life as a teen and as an adult and all y'all can reply with is "but noooo all the girls are innocent though."

I said in my first post the shyt dude say was pedo shyt. That was the first thing i said. Don't loop me in with none of these internet nikkas saviors you imbecile

This why I don't normally post in these threads. Everybody blinded by either extreme(ly retarded) views or by outrage and there's hardly ever any in-between.

 

[KBtheKey]

Imagine being a grown man and even having the ability to view underage middle school girls as "little hoes."

I almost vommitted reading this.

I went to school with em. Grew up with a few. If they are that type then that's that's the same as calling them fast but what i need a filter on a message board for?

Why y'all acting like "fast tailed lil girls" don't exist no more? Am i in the matrix?