If The Earth Is Flat Then What Shapes Are The Other Planets?

[xCivicx]

“not to scale”


nah dummy, they’re straight up inaccurate. No amount of rescaling will make those maps accurate. You big doofus

The top one is on the official United Nations flag

So I'm not sure what it is you're laughing at

 

[xCivicx]

nothing to do with water

Huh?

Do you know what pangea allegedly is/was?

 

[R.E.N. Spells Ren]

The top one is on the official United Nations flag

So I'm not sure what it is you're laughing at

You love to tout irrelevant shyt. What does it matter that it’s on the UN flag? That doesn’t legitimize the map. The UN isn’t claiming it’s accurate and the world is flat.

 

[HiphopRelated]

Huh?

Do you know what pangea allegedly is/was?

Yes, and it was not floating on fukking water

 

[Doomsday]

Probably not

But only like less than 500 people have ever been to "space"

That's like less than .00000006% of the population

If 15 million people were chilling in an area and 1 of them said they looked god in the eye, would the other 14,999,999 people be obligated to believe that person

That's how I view people who've been to "outer space"

But you DO believe in God though. So you believe in God, but don't believe anyone has seen God?

Water makes more sense on a flat plane than on a globe

No it actually doesn't. If you take gravity away water can't sustain on either surface unless both planes had indentation. Which according to your theory, would make the earth a cone, not a flat disc.

You literally can not ever show me an example of water curving around a ball, anywhere in this reality

Of course I can. You can't take something away simply because you don't believe in it Gravity can be simulated and duplicated as well. Of course you're going to say you don't believe in that, so I digress.

a flat object made up of 90 percent water can't sustain either. You can't show me an example of that anywhere. Two can play the semantics game.
You're not even debating me, your just throwing decoys and strawman out there to avoid the point of contention.

That horizontal/vertical thing you keep talking about is nonsense

Once again, you expose yourself.

Flat surfaces have four points with two sides or 8 points with 6 sides. Again, what shape is the Earth and moon? Stop ducking the question with decoys.

Explain? We can all see the moon and sun. What kind of flat surface? A cone? A disc? What?

Also, you can't see the entire Earth, so by your own logic, how do YOU know for sure it's flat and we're being lied to when that same logic applies to you? You haven't explored the entirety of the Earth.

Isaac Newton most definitely DID NOT believe in gravity, and I just posted proof

Yes he did, and you didn't post anything but conjecture. Newton had a load of theories about the world and life, why would he press on with Gravity out of everything he was studying when he could have
went harder on his other theories if he didn't believe it? You're not making sense except to use strawman. Posting a letter is supposed to prove gravity doesn't exist but any text or letter or book or
anything about Earth, the Moon, and Space is fraudulent?

You keep exposing yourself. Issac Newton is a quack according to you but you believe in the legitimacy of a letter he wrote? Hilarious.

Not only that, Isaac Newton became extremely religious as he aged(I wonder why)

That's typical of almost every old person. Beleiving in the afterlife for fear of death is the core of all religious beliefs.

The majority of his writings were religious in nature and about the occult. I chalk his gravity talk up to youthful ignorance

Sounds like he got senile as he got older, which is normal.

Again, Newton is a quack one minute, then he's a truth teller when he speaks on religion and the occult.

So mentioning the occult is credible too? You believe in the occult too?

Gravity as a concept makes absolutely no sense. It supposedly glues a 5 ton truck to the ground while simultaneously allowing birds to fly freely and water to slosh around in the oceans

Hilarious.

Nothing you said disproves gravity. Birds fly because they are built to fly, and yes it causes stress on their body obviously, or else they would be able to fly forever, especially without gravity holding them back.

On the subject of no gravity, explain inertia and stamina? Why do we get tired?

Speaking of water, it must be an "anti-gravity" device because if something is placed in water and it's less dense than the volume of water it's in, it floats, which completely negates gravity

No it doesn't. It only floats if it's hollow or allows air into it.

If anything it proves gravity exists, because EVERY object should float without gravity in water.

How can gravity and bouyancy simultaneously exist as forces on this plane??(HINT: THEY CANNOT EXIST SIMULTANEOUSLY)

Because water has oxygen in it. That's why human beings can swim and drown in water. Because we are solid objects yet retain water and oxygen (blood) in our bodies. The air in water and in our bodies allow us to transverse in water although not completely.

Hold up: So you believe in Buoyancy but not gravity? Hilarious.

The sun and moon are most likely powered by electromagnetism, bound to the north pole

You realize electromagnetism is a scientific theory right? A theory that is helped by the existence of gravity.

Bound to the north pole? So the Sun and moon transfer energy to the Earth? Why? Based on what? You never explained what shape are the Sun, Moon and Earth to make that statement. What shape are the sun and moon and Earth also how does that correlate with their ability to release power to the Earth?

 

[xCivicx]

You love to tout irrelevant shyt. What does it matter that it’s on the UN flag? That doesn’t legitimize the map. The UN isn’t claiming it’s accurate and the world is flat.

Why is it on the UN flag?

 

[xCivicx]

Yes, and it was not floating on fukking water

So how did the landmasses separate?

 

[xCivicx]

But you DO believe in God though. So you believe in God, but don't believe anyone has seen God?




No it actually doesn't. If you take gravity away water can't sustain on either surface unless both planes had indentation. Which according to your theory, would make the earth a cone, not a flat disc.



Of course I can. You can't take something away simply because you don't believe in it Gravity can be simulated and duplicated as well. Of course you're going to say you don't believe in that, so I digress.

a flat object made up of 90 percent water can't sustain either. You can't show me an example of that anywhere. Two can play the semantics game.
You're not even debating me, your just throwing decoys and strawman out there to avoid the point of contention.



Once again, you expose yourself.

Flat surfaces have four points with two sides or 8 points with 6 sides. Again, what shape is the Earth and moon? Stop ducking the question with decoys.

Explain? We can all see the moon and sun. What kind of flat surface? A cone? A disc? What?

Also, you can't see the entire Earth, so by your own logic, how do YOU know for sure it's flat and we're being lied to when that same logic applies to you? You haven't explored the entirety of the Earth.




Yes he did, and you didn't post anything but conjecture. Newton had a load of theories about the world and life, why would he press on with Gravity out of everything he was studying when he could have
went harder on his other theories if he didn't believe it? You're not making sense except to use strawman. Posting a letter is supposed to prove gravity doesn't exist but any text or letter or book or
anything about Earth, the Moon, and Space is fraudulent?

You keep exposing yourself. Issac Newton is a quack according to you but you believe in the legitimacy of a letter he wrote? Hilarious.



That's typical of almost every old person. Beleiving in the afterlife for fear of death is the core of all religious beliefs.



Sounds like he got senile as he got older, which is normal.

Again, Newton is a quack one minute, then he's a truth teller when he speaks on religion and the occult.

So mentioning the occult is credible too? You believe in the occult too?




Hilarious.

Nothing you said disproves gravity. Birds fly because they are built to fly, and yes it causes stress on their body obviously, or else they would be able to fly forever, especially without gravity holding them back.

On the subject of no gravity, explain inertia and stamina? Why do we get tired?



No it doesn't. It only floats if it's hollow or allows air into it.

If anything it proves gravity exists, because EVERY object should float without gravity in water.





Because water has oxygen in it. That's why human beings can swim and drown in water. Because we are solid objects yet retain water and oxygen (blood) in our bodies. The air in water and in our bodies allow us to transverse in water although not completely.

Hold up: So you believe in Buoyancy but not gravity? Hilarious.



You realize electromagnetism is a scientific theory right? A theory that is helped by the existence of gravity.

Bound to the north pole? So the Sun and moon transfer energy to the Earth? Why? Based on what? You never explained what shape are the Sun, Moon and Earth to make that statement. What shape are the sun and moon and Earth also how does that correlate with their ability to release power to the Earth?

This is a bunch of nonsense that did not refute anything at all that ive posted.

You didnt even try

You dont understand what the flat earth model actually looks like, or anything else about the concept but its ok

You think electromagnetism is a "theory" so you already exposed yourself

The older wiser newton didnt fukk with gravity at all. This is a fact

Go back through some of my old threads and learn something

But before you do that, post proof that water can curve around a ball. If you can do that ill take a ban right now

 

[HiphopRelated]

So how did the landmasses separate?

If I have to seriously answer that, you don't believe anyway and don't have the time to invest.

I would like to know what you think is beneath the sea bed though....just curiosity

 

[Geordi]

Video has responses to many flat earth claims:

 

[Doomsday]

This is a bunch of nonsense that did not refute anything at all that ive posted.

Exactly, when you meet an intellectually superior, you retreat. You only believe in flat earth for online attention. I'm done with you. Let everyone go back to our back and forth in the future from now on.

You dont understand what the flat earth model actually looks like, or anything else about the concept but its ok

I'm still waiting on you to explain it based on the questions I asked. You can't so you won't because you know once you answer I'll cook you with my higher IQ.

You think electromagnetism is a "theory" so you already exposed yourself

Every scientific discovery is a theory. Now who exposed themselves? Nice try as a strawman but ended up baking yourself.

You're dumber than I originally gave you credit for. My mistake.

The older wiser newton didnt fukk with gravity at all. This is a fact

Again, with the dancing. Do you believe in the legitimacy of Newton or not? Again, you haven't answered a single basic question I asked.

But before you do that, post proof that water can curve around a ball. If you can do that ill take a ban right now

Let every poster use our back and forth as proof that @xCivicx is full of it and doesn't even fully believe in the bull he's selling. I already answered this in my last post. Without gravity neither surface can sustain. He skips that and goes right back to another strawman,

All you post are decoys and strawmen meant to spark further debate for attention. Notice everyone how he STILL never answered the basic question of what shape are the Earth, Sun, and Moon and how he knows what shape the Earth is based on his OWN logic that "no one has seen it". He can't even explain what type of flat surface these objects are. He's remedial.

He only quotes parts of posts that he can throw strawmen at. He's a noob level debater and has remedial actual knowledge on the subject he champions. He's basically a internet troll version of Stephen Crowder. Just find the one piece of a statement he believes he can throw rocks at and don't stop, and ignore anyone post or poster that says anything knowledgable. He just wants attention. He loves that he's known as the "Flat Earth Guy" of the Coli. It's probably the only thing that keeps him going.​

 

[xCivicx]

If I have to seriously answer that, you don't believe anyway and don't have the time to invest.

I would like to know what you think is beneath the sea bed though....just curiosity

Ill tell you as soon as you tell me how pangea separated

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

You dont understand what the flat earth model actually looks like, or anything else.

But before you do that, post proof that water can curve around a ball. If you can do that ill take a ban right now

There IS no Flat Earth model and any one you present to show how certain phenomena occur on it just disproves EVERY other claim you make regarding the Earth's shape.​

In order to prove water will adhere to a ball due to gravity, we'd have to construct a ball the size of the Earth which is retarded and anti-scientific. Birds, butterflies, mosquitos, etc., create lift with their wings which cancels the effect of gravity. If the oceans had wings, they could do the same, but, as soon as the lift force ceases, they ALL come back to the Earth. If gravity doesn't exist, why don't they just hover in mid-air or go up?​

​

 

[xCivicx]

Exactly, when you meet an intellectually superior, you retreat. You only believe in flat earth for online attention. I'm done with you. Let everyone go back to our back and forth in the future from now on.





I'm still waiting on you to explain it based on the questions I asked. You can't so you won't because you know once you answer I'll cook you with my higher IQ.




Every scientific discovery is a theory. Now who exposed themselves? Nice try as a strawman but ended up baking yourself.

You're dumber than I originally gave you credit for. My mistake.



Again, with the dancing. Do you believe in the legitimacy of Newton or not? Again, you haven't answered a single basic question I asked.





Let every poster use our back and forth as proof that @xCivicx is full of it and doesn't even fully believe in the bull he's selling. I already answered this in my last post. Without gravity neither surface can sustain. He skips that and goes right back to another strawman,

All you post are decoys and strawmen meant to spark further debate for attention. Notice everyone how he STILL never answered the basic question of what shape are the Earth, Sun, and Moon and how he knows what shape the Earth is based on his OWN logic that "no one has seen it". He can't even explain what type of flat surface these objects are. He's remedial.

He only quotes parts of posts that he can throw strawmen at. He's a noob level debater and has remedial actual knowledge on the subject he champions. He's basically a internet troll version of Stephen Crowder. Just find the one piece of a statement he believes he can throw rocks at and don't stop, and ignore anyone post or poster that says anything knowledgable. He just wants attention. He loves that he's known as the "Flat Earth Guy" of the Coli. It's probably the only thing that keeps him going.​

More gibberish

Youre the new guy here son, you dont know how this works yet

You didn't refute any of my posts in here

You think emag is a theory

You think you can just ignore a fact like the inventor of the theory of gravity said it was bullshyt

Youre a troll and a fan

 

[HiphopRelated]

Ill tell you as soon as you tell me how pangea separated

Brother we already know you have some left field position, just get it over with and state it.