If The Earth Is Flat Then What Shapes Are The Other Planets?

[xCivicx]

You've probably been asked this before, but what reason the reason for this hugely inconsequential lie. What do they get out of telling people the earth is round when they know its flat?

Flat earth proves intelligent design

Nihilistic atheistic materialistic depressed people are easier to control and take resources from

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

lol, well this is a new one. Man you're creative with this bullshyt

So volcanoes come from where?

The amount of interconnected lies, cotdamn breh. At some point it has to be tiring

It ain't new, breh. That comes from the late 17th Century when cats were trying to use natural theology to reconcile the Genesis flood with geological findings. It was given up in the 19th Century. Look up 'Diluvialism'.

Only people that still consider that argument valid are Young Earth Creationists.

​

 

[xCivicx]

How can can any one location in Antarctica get 24 hours of daylight using that flat earth you model you've posted

If you know anything about circles, you know that the larger the radius, the larger the angular distance that needs to be traveled to traverse said circle

At the antarctic circle, the sun is moving on it's largest path around the plane, and it's speed doesn't remains constant, which means that it'll spend 24 hours to traverse like 1/4th of the total distance of the antarctic circle, not the whole thing

That's where the 24 hour day comes from

 

[KodeBlue]

Again, I'm just showing you how you're contradicting your own stance

Again, the earth is not a closed system like a plane is. I just finally got you to admit this

Ummm... ok?

There is no physical barrier, at least flat earth has yet to prove that there is one.

 

[HiphopRelated]

How is this a new one when I've said all of this stuff directly to you in previous threads?

Why are y'all coming in here just to troll??

You spoke on islands floating on water before? Lol, like how is that even an idea to come up with? Where does that thought even come from.

 

[HiphopRelated]

How can can any one location in Antarctica get 24 hours of daylight using that flat earth you model you've posted

Lol, Australia and Lower South America in perpetual 6 hrs of sunlight per day, and the Arctic circle can't catch a wink of dark night sleep. shyt is hilarious.

 

[xCivicx]

Oh course you don't, you're remedial, trying to pass yourself off as intelligent. Every time I post you ignore me, and anyone else who has sense. I don't care that you believe in flat Earth and that's not why I think you're remedial, it's because your doing the common tactic of "I don't understand" anything that's on point or ignoring the post outright. You only debate people that you know you can poke at.

You fukked up quoting me because you thought what I said didn't make sense but it makes perfect sense, which is why I've been dapped up a few times already and just posted it.

I'll ask you again: What shape is the Earth? A flat rectangle, square, or circle (disc)? No matter what you answer, the Earth would have to be in a horizontal position because of gravity. Speaking of gravity, could you explain to me how earth is able to sustain water on this surface? If you can't answer these basic questions, it tells me everything I need to know and we can stop the conversation here.

You're being dapped by my fans, but that's ok because I'll give you the attention you want too

It's really hard trying to communicate to people who are simultaneously so arrogant and ignorant

As I've said 10000 times, heliocentric theory is trash pseudoscience

Gravity is a part heliocentric theory

Gravity would not exist outside of heliocentric theory

Gravity is also trash pseudoscience. Again, I've proved this in multiple other threads

Even the "inventor" of gravity didn't believe in it


Original letter from Isaac Newton to Richard Bentley (Normalized Version)

Original letter from Isaac Newton to Richard Bentley

The last clause of your second Position I like very well. Tis unconceivable that inanimate brute matter should (without the mediation of something else which is not material) operate upon & affect other matter without mutual contact; as it must if gravitation in the sense of Epicurus be essential & inherent in it. And this is one reason why I desired you would not ascribe {innate} gravity to me. That gravity should be innate inherent & {essential} to matter so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of any thing else by & through which their action or force {may} be conveyed from one to another is to me so great an absurdity that I beleive no man who has in philosophical matters any competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent {acting} <7v> consta{ntl}y according to certain laws, but whether this agent be material or immaterial is a question I have left to the consideration of my readers.

 

[KodeBlue]

If you know anything about circles, you know that the larger the radius, the larger the angular distance that needs to be traveled to traverse said circle

At the antarctic circle, the sun is moving on it's largest path around the plane, and it's speed doesn't remains constant, which means that it'll spend 24 hours to traverse like 1/4th of the total distance of the antarctic circle, not the whole thing

That's where the 24 hour day comes from

I said that same thing to you. You're agreeing with me to argue against me.

I think you're trolling now. If you can't come of with anything to further your case, we'll have to end this debate.

 

[xCivicx]

Ummm... ok?

There is no physical barrier, at least flat earth has yet to prove that there is one.

So because the earth is not a closed system, and the coriolis effect mandates that once you leave the ground, you are no longer moving at the rate of speed that the earth is moving, you should be able to hover in a helicopter and observe land rotating under you but you can't

I don't know what's so hard to understand about this

 

[xCivicx]

You spoke on islands floating on water before? Lol, like how is that even an idea to come up with? Where does that thought even come from.

So you've never heard of pangea?

 

[KodeBlue]

Lol, Australia and Lower South America in perpetual 6 hrs of sunlight per day, and the Arctic circle can't catch a wink of dark night sleep. shyt is hilarious.

What he's saying makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

 

[xCivicx]

Lol, Australia and Lower South America in perpetual 6 hrs of sunlight per day, and the Arctic circle can't catch a wink of dark night sleep. shyt is hilarious.

Sassy gibberish

 

[xCivicx]

I said that same thing to you. You're agreeing with me to argue against me.

I think you're trolling now. If you can't come of with anything to further your case, we'll have to end this debate.

No one is keeping you here breh

Feel free to quote where you think I'm agreeing with you to argue against you, I just clearly explained to you how 24 hour days work on the flat earth model

You can either choose to try and understand or move on

 

[KodeBlue]

So because the earth is not a closed system, and the coriolis effect mandates that once you leave the ground, you are no longer moving at the rate of speed that the earth is moving, you should be able to hover in a helicopter and observe land rotating under you but you can't

I don't know what's so hard to understand about this

So does earth stop rotating to allow you time to leave the ground, then start rotating again once you're off of it?

 

[xCivicx]

So does earth stop rotating to allow you time to leave the ground, then start rotating again once you're off of it?

I have no idea

Ask your scientists who created the concept of the coriolis effect