Apart from boxing (which you don't dominate), my point is made.
almost all champions of all weight classes through history are american.
Apart from boxing (which you don't dominate), my point is made.
The best player in the world isn't very athletic.
You don't understand the skill involved.
US would run soccer.
yeah, but we're doing better than the UK
Anyways, I was lurking bodybuilder a few days ago, and a few people actually had the nerve to say that Cristiano Ronaldo is a better athlete than Lebron fukking James. some of them said that Ronaldo would most likely make it in the NBA than Lebron making it into professional football.
Why?
The best player in the world is very athletic. He has awesome reflexes, body control, and stamina. messi has godly balance too id be willing to bet...
It is obvious that any first world country with a culture geared towards anything would be good as fukk at whatever they desired.
yeah, but we're doing better than the UK
Anyways, I was lurking bodybuilder a few days ago, and a few people actually had the nerve to say that Cristiano Ronaldo is a better athlete than Lebron fukking James. some of them said that Ronaldo would most likely make it in the NBA than Lebron making it into professional football.
4th in the world mate, you in the top 3?
I don't even know who lebron Is, but I bet he's tall and fast.
Only skills needed in American sports tbh.
so you honestly think England is better than Italy, Netherlands and France?Especially when Italy outclassed you guys this pass Euro? Come on now, you don't believe that crappy as ranking.
in the future the teams that are going to win at soccer the most are china and india. these are really poor countries right now but when they develop to first world status they'll have a sample size greater than any other country ie a population of 1 billion is more likely to produce one great player out of every thousand than a country of 300 million