So you basically agree,but just lack the ability to read.
"So acting like he got it all off purely the grind is kindve false. Giannis is literally being called a rookie sensation here.
Which means Thanasis couldve easily been drafted off "pedigree" like many players are. So do I have a real issue with drafting the son of the arguable goat(to some people,not me) based on pedigree?"
"Ive proven my point already.
Thanasis is in the league right now because of his brother. And arguably got drafted because of his brother."
Now this is you humbly agreeing
"Nepotism isn't people seeing that you have a talented brother & hoping you have the same talent. "
No shyt,thats called scouting. But Giannis could technically still be the reason Thanasis was drafted. Because scouts were hoping he had the same talent as his brother. So acting like he earned his way in completely on his own merit isnt neccesssrily the truth. He couldve been drafted due to pedigree.
"Now, you can arguing that Giannis is CURRENTLY in his current position as one of the greatest players ever is keeping his brother in the league, fine, "
Arguably
? So is this not nepotism? For those who need the definition
"Nepotism is the act of granting an advantage, privilege, or position to relatives or friends in an occupation or field. "
So basically Thanasis RIGHT NOW is benefitting from nepotism just like Bronny is. And according to YOU,good scouting and common sense
"That's actually common sense to assume that 2 people with the same parents & background would share some of the same talent"-The Amerikkkan Idol
So assuming shared parents might grant two siblings the same talent is common sense. But assuming the son of one of the greatest basketball players of all time,could have some of the same talent, Or could hit a growth spurt because his FATHER won the genetic lottery is not common sense? Thats greater common sense than what you said was common sense