I get what the OP is saying. Basically, if you're with a chick that CAN'T be happy with you at home and HAS to be out and about all the time, then she is not relationship material. I have seen it with my own two eyes how dudes will get with women that are always in the streets-go out with their girlfriends to happy hour 3 days a week, hang out at the newest bars downtown every Saturday night for "girls night out", always going to this or that party, etc.
Dudes were literally having to fight to squeeze in time with their chick. If your chick wants to spend more time with her homegirls and getting BS attention from dudes at random public spaces than you....SHE IS NOT YOUR CHICK! Alot of dudes have rent-a-girlfriends right now.
This may not be popular, but homebodies usually make better girlfriends/wives. Before the myopic responses roll in, being a homebody doesn't mean that a person never wants to leave the house, travel or have a "night on the town." It means that they are comfortable being at home alone or with their partner without any outside stimuli.
Every dude that I know who dated an "out and about" kind of chick ended up finding out that she "was out and about" with some dude(s) who she forgot to mention. Oh, and she slipped, tripped and fell on his....well, you know.
Peace
Society brainwashes these dudes into thinking that all chicks have to be a part of this bullshyt. Like having a nerdy homebody wife is not an option now.