Breh, they're deporting people for crimes they've never been arrested for.What exactly is wrong with the bold here...
Foreigners with a suspect past who have been naturalized shouldn't be investigated and deported if discovered they lied ?
Now that is CRUEL but its also logical...
For foreigners living in this country is not a right, it is a privilege...you lie and get caught, you get deported...
Sensible and logical immigration policy...
Now that is CRUEL but its also logical...
For foreigners living in this country is not a right, it is a privilege...you lie and get caught, you get deported...
Sensible and logical immigration policy...
She filed her citizenship application.The stated reason was that Borgono became a U.S. citizen after the fraud scheme started. Although she had not yet been charged when she applied for citizenship, the Department of Justice is now arguing that she lied by not divulging her criminal activity on her application.
During her sentencing in 2012, the judge was sympathetic to Borgono. She had not profited from the scheme and had helped the authorities bring the case against her boss. As a testament to her character, members of her community, including her priest, had submitted to the court letters of support and photos of her volunteering.
The citizenship application contains the question, “Have you EVER committed, assisted in committing, or attempted to commit, a crime or offense for which you were NOT arrested?” (emphasis original). Lying on that question makes any applicant vulnerable to having his or her citizenship later revoked and is the basis of the vast majority of denaturalization cases.
Last summer, the Supreme Court heard a court case about how broadly the government could use answers to that question to revoke citizenship. The U.S. attorney argued that it could for any crime, even something as small as driving five miles over the speed limit, an example provided by Chief Justice John Roberts as a crime he had committed but never had been arrested for.
During the hearing, Justice Stephen Breyer said he found it “rather surprising that the government of the United States thinks” the naturalization law should be “interpreted in a way that would throw into doubt the citizenship of vast percentages of all naturalized citizens.”
The court ruled unanimously that only material offenses need to be disclosed.
How “material offenses” get interpreted is beginning to play out in denaturalization cases around the country, as decades-long residents find themselves unexpectedly in court.
Here we go with the typical #lowerlearning calling a black man who doesn't agree with your idiotic position on immigration a CAC or white suptemacist...She filed her citizenship application.
Her boss was defrauding the government.
The FBI came to her and she cooperated.
She got sentenced. Did her time. AND RECEIVED HER CITIZENSHIP AFTER THE FACT.
The US government granted her citizenship.
Now y'all want to claim she defrauded the government because she didn't modify a submitted application that was in the possession of the government?
The corrupt judic-oh it's only immigrants getting in trouble
Please keep your white supremacy in check
Here we go with the typical #lowerlearning calling a black man who doesn't agree with your idiotic position on immigration a CAC or white suptemacist...
"If what you say is true" ...it's right in the article! All we ask if that y'all READ and LEARN the way the law is being twisted against black and brown people. You guys sound like white #alllivesmatter folks when you run into these thread arguing law and order.If what you say is true about her case then I do not support that woman being deported...
I only support deportation of naturalized citizens if it can be proven the individual deliberately lied on the application...