This is what bothers me about the whole East/West disparity narrative.
No one with an IQ above room temperature would argue that there are significantly more talented teams in the West, and that is a "deeper" conference, but that doesn't change the fact that only 2 or 3 are true contenders to make it to the Finals. Likewise, the East has only 2-3 potential Finals teams, but a dumpster fire from the 5-seed on down. You could certainly argue that it is more likely for the best teams in the West to get knocked out earlier than they should due to the wealth of talent, poor matchups, and whatnot, and it would be a valid argument, but it is usually the glut of teams in that 3rd-6th seed range that end up feasting on each other and furthering the narrative.
Ultimately, you tend to see the same results from each conference from the 2nd round of the playoffs onward barring injury, i.e. two of the best three teams making the conference finals and very few upsets. Especially with the first round expanded to 7 games, the NBA playoffs system is simply not built for 4-8 seeds to make, let alone win, the Finals.
You will likely never see another 1995 Rockets or 1999 Knicks (lockout-shortened season) again without extreme circumstances -- such as OKC potentially this year with their early-season injuries.