How is he completely different? Only difference is he has more minutes since his rookie year
BETTER FINISHING AT THE RIM, BETTER PASSER, BETTER HANDLES, BETTER DEFENSE, BETTER FREETHROW SHOOTER
HE’S DEVELOPED EVERYTHING OUTSIDE OF HIS THREEPOINTER
How is he completely different? Only difference is he has more minutes since his rookie year
And yet he's still better than Randle. Go figure.IM WATCHIN THE BULLS-PACERS GAME
JABARI THE WOAT 2ND OVERALL PICK OR NAAH?
DARKO > JABARI
Before the second ACL...dude was lightning.IM WATCHIN THE BULLS-PACERS GAME
JABARI THE WOAT 2ND OVERALL PICK OR NAAH?
DARKO > JABARI
And yet he's still better than Randle. Go figure.
So you’re arguing old Jabari vs Current Randle? I just want this to be clearJabari was on another level to Julius before his second ACL tear - it wasn't even close. That argument was dead long ago. Any attempt at trying to rehash it is only exposing yourself for what not knowing what you're talking about.
You've been shytting on the league for its state of inflated stats, now you come in here with this nonsense. He's still the same damn player, doing the same damn things.
Before the second ACL...dude was lightning.
I'm telling you that this Randle v. Jabari debate was dead long ago.So you’re arguing old Jabari vs Current Randle? I just want this to be clear
This actually applies to you and y'all Lakers fans. You're only dikkriding Randle because he was a Laker, you wouldn't even be discussing him right now if he was drafted to Milwaukee. I couldn't give a fukk about Jabari, or what team he was on. Because it's quite obvious weren't paying attention when he established himself as a good 2nd/3rd option in '16/'17. When has Randle ever estbalished himself as anything but a role player?LETS BE REAL..IF RANDLE WAS THE NEXT COMING OF CHARLES BARKLEY AND JABARI PARKER WAS SAM BOWIE, YOU'D STILL SAY THIS.
HE WENT FROM AVERAGE TO TRASH
THAT 20 PPG WAS THE DEFINITION OF EMPTY STATS
BUCKS ACTUALLY STARTED DOING MUCHHHH BETTER AFTER HIS INJURY THAT SEASON
I'm telling you that this Randle v. Jabari debate was dead long ago.
This actually applies to you and y'all Lakers fans. You're only dikkriding Randle because he was a Laker, you wouldn't even be discussing him right now if he was drafted to Milwaukee. I couldn't give a fukk about Jabari, or what team he was on. Because it's quite obvious weren't paying attention when he established himself as a good 2nd/3rd option in '16/'17. When has Randle ever estbalished himself as anything but a role player?
You wouldn't be discussing him if he was drafted by Milwaukee. You only started dikkriding him because he was on the Lakers. ALL FACTS.I ALREADY SHIITED ON THIS LOGIC....IF WHAT YOUR SAYING IS TRUE, WHY DO I SAY DANGELO RUSSELL IS A BUST? TRUTH IS, U HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.
.
They actually weren't, they were performing on a similar level, prior to when they lost their way a few weeks before the ASB. Nevertheless, I don't get the point in bringing this up, when Jabari was performing on a far, far superior level to Julius that season. You weren't even watching the Bucks that season; stop trying to fake the funk..AGAIN, BUCKS ACTUALLY STARTED DOING BETTER AFTER JABARI TORE HIS ACL THAT YEAR.
And this is why you're the WOAT.Context matters.
That post was in response to some LeBron stan trying to argue he was playing great cause he's putting up his typical stat line. I cited the inflated stats around the league to counter his argument LeBron is playing as good as he always does. He ain't. That was the point of that post.
Julius Randle ain't LeBron. He ain't being talked about on that level. You acting like he's a bum. I cited his per minute stats to show that ain't as bad as you make him out to be. Is he a superstar? No. But you don't put up the type of numbers he's putting up and get talked about the way you talking bout him.
Julius Randle is a good player. Eye test proves that. So does his numbers.
I must say this is hilarious considering that Julius is the king of "empty stats".THAT 20 PPG WAS THE DEFINITION OF EMPTY STATS