I don’t know who this white boy is but god damn he bodied Sam seder

wtfyomom

All Star
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
7,704
Reputation
-757
Daps
11,438
Reppin
NULL
The second impeachment was not
In the sense that it would not result in convicting Trump it was also performative . If it’s only on substance of the action itself you should also be for the m4a vote
 

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,799
Reputation
278
Daps
18,543
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
In the sense that it would not result in convicting Trump it was also performative . If it’s only on substance of the action itself you should also be for the m4a vote
There was a good chance it could have led to Trumps conviction which would have prevented from being able to run for President again. I don’t necessarily agree with performative votes because it comes with the assumption that the average voter cares for the action
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
6,002
Daps
132,749
Yeah but what points did Sam land? He argued for giving money to corporate dems who have been ruthless with progressives you aren’t gonna grease any wheels , I think also you can sell out to be a careerist aoc for sure has that energy the tax the rich dress comes to mind. He argued mcarthy would be speaker he would not , he’s basically arguing never to use leverage like I said he he never would’ve ran aoc by the way he dismiss the Arizona progressive not saying she’d have won but that isn’t the point even the point about woman’s suffrage he acts like at the time it was a forgone conclusion woman would get the vote no it wasn’t , he argues to do nothing that’s not a point
Hinkle’s basic premise was that the squad are sellouts and Harris defends these sellouts, and that we could somehow get better progressive policy outcomes if they weren’t sellouts and he came with all his arguments prepared.

He didn’t make a strong case though. :unimpressed:

Like the part about the 12% increase in State department funding. I certainly don’t think 3 or 4 House members have the power to get major foreign policy concessions by blocking the vote. Do you really think the military-industrial complex will say “Hey since you stalled our 12% funding increase we’ll go ahead and end the Cuban embargo or stop drone strikes in Yemen”? I think the corporate Dems would find some way to fukk them out of some other policy matter that may be unrelated as getback.

Hinkle kept saying the squad got no concessions. That isn’t true. Most of the concessions came in BBB. Hinkle points out that obviously BBB didn’t get passed but that’s because it failed in the Senate. It was assumed to be passed into law and it wasn’t. All 6 squad members voted no on BIF like they were supposed to. :unimpressed:
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2015
Messages
15,508
Reputation
2,136
Daps
58,251
I didn’t really like Jamie but I don’t think it’s a coincidence a communist got replaced by two msnbc type liberals

it went from being a socialist a commie and a social democrat, basically Sam being furthest right to Sam being furthest left it’s pretty much insufferable to someone like me

since Brooks died I really don’t be watching any of the yt shows like that , very sporadically
:mjlol:In what world is Emma an “msnbc liberal”. She shyts on democrats more than Sam
 
Top