Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
I don’t know why I’m even watching this but I’m 11 minutes in and I don’t see it yet. Seder is owning dude.
I don’t know who this white boy is but god damn he bodied Sam seder
- Thread starter wtfyomom
- Start date
saturn7
Politics is an EXCHANGE!!!
New Jeruzalem Journalist
Superstar
Just skip to like the last 3 or 4 minutes. A good portion of this shyt was unwatchable because dude relies so heavily on interruptions and overtalking as a debate tactic.
What is owning though ? I feel like Seder just uses “debate tactics “ but isn’t taking the Correct position or saying anything substantive
Like ok dude said FTv instead of use leverage but to get stuck in that semantic argument for ten minutes just to avoid the actual issue is bullshyt but y’all eat that up , Sam is acting just as much of a condescending dikk as the other dude
he seriously argues mcarthy could be speaker which isn’t true , he says oh that Arizona progressive would’ve never won by this logic he never would’ve ran aoc and we’d be less progressive now , he’s a status quo defender and dem shill
Like ok dude said FTv instead of use leverage but to get stuck in that semantic argument for ten minutes just to avoid the actual issue is bullshyt but y’all eat that up , Sam is acting just as much of a condescending dikk as the other dude
he seriously argues mcarthy could be speaker which isn’t true , he says oh that Arizona progressive would’ve never won by this logic he never would’ve ran aoc and we’d be less progressive now , he’s a status quo defender and dem shill
Sam literally did the same shyt though and Sam did that ALL the time to Jamie
Sam fools y’all that he’s smart cause he’s good at debate bullying idiots, he’s argues against the dumbest people , the people he wants to debate the most were Reuben dore and crowder you couldn’t find 3 bigger morons
Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
Substantively I don’t think dude landed any points. It was a bunch of “if they would’ve just done this then so-and-so would’ve done that and it would’ve caused that to happen and if you disagree you’re a sellout.”
Yeah but what points did Sam land? He argued for giving money to corporate dems who have been ruthless with progressives you aren’t gonna grease any wheels , I think also you can sell out to be a careerist aoc for sure has that energy the tax the rich dress comes to mind. He argued mcarthy would be speaker he would not , he’s basically arguing never to use leverage like I said he he never would’ve ran aoc by the way he dismiss the Arizona progressive not saying she’d have won but that isn’t the point even the point about woman’s suffrage he acts like at the time it was a forgone conclusion woman would get the vote no it wasn’t , he argues to do nothing that’s not a point
Outlaw
New Hope For the HaveNotz
Jason Twinkle’s position was trash. He wanted a performative vote on Medicare for all knowing it wouldn’t pass but shytted on the squad for the BBB not passing the senate. What?
Outlaw
New Hope For the HaveNotz
The second impeachment was not