Again, i can get circumsized whenever. You cant grow foreskin back ever
That alone tells me you have no clue and will never experience what other men are enjoying but want to act like an authority on the matter
Thecoli never fails
Sccit said:SO LEME GUESS, YOURE A “REAL JEW”?
Im being quoted all throughout this thread and i give each quote its own post response
You're a filthy Eastern European Khazar imposter....
.......even though Jews lived throughout the Western Roman Empire since the 1st Century CE.......but they don't count....
arent you one of the main ones on here talking about how you shouldnt be led by femalesWHY WOULD ANY1 WANA GROW FORESKIN BACK?
THE ONLY REASON I CAN SEE THAT HAPPENING IS IF THEY HAD ISSUES IN BED N WANTED TO BLAME IT ON THEY DICC...
BUT LETS BE HONEST, IF U GROW UP WIT FORESKIN U GUNA BE USED TO IT AND MOST LIKELY TRY TO JUSTIFY IT AS OPPOSED TO GETTIN IT REMOVED
HERE’S ALL THAT REALLY MATTERS BRODIE
Over 54% of the women polled said they prefer a circumcised penis, followed by 33% who had no preference. Only 3% of the female respondents said they prefer an uncircumcised penis. And nearly 10% of the women refused to answer.
AdamAndEve.com Asks Women: Do You Prefer A Circumcised or Uncircumcised Penis?
arent you one of the main ones on here talking about how you shouldnt be led by females
Isnt that exactly what you're cosigning here? All in the name of justifying circumcision?
Sccit said:NOT A KHAZAR
You have yet to post proof of the bold but go off
A botched surgery LITERALLY is a health complication of said surgery, but go off
Youre protesting too much in here. Its obvious that youre trying to convince yourself that you're cool with a procedure done to you that you never had a choice in, in the first place
I love that my parents left the OPTION up to me, something that you can never say with respect to this topic
But again, go off
Sarcasm doesn't translate too well in text format.....even with smilies.
Like Dafunk said: from their mothers. These articles rely solely on the notion that correlation actually equals causation. The state can put all the sanctions they want, but mitzitzo is halocho and it is here to stay regardless of what secular law deems 'legal' or appropriate.
Where is the confirmation? Were the mohelim asked for a sample? If so, did they provide it? If so, did it test positive for the virus, and if so did their respective DNA match the babies' viruses? None of these questions are asked, let alone answered. No DNA, no proof. It looks like the same propagandists who drove the sensational reporting that led to Bloomberg's regulations are still hard at work. There is zero proof that the herpes came from the mohelim; here, or in any other case. To date, not a single case has yet been proven. The charge that mitzitzo vfeh is the cause of the neonatal herpes simplex virus infection has never been conclusively proven. Even if all this supposed evidence were really there (and it isn't) we would still have no right to change Jewish Law for it. We would simply have to accept the risk and pay the price, just as we have always done for the circumcision itself, which HAS caused death due to coagulation-related genetic conditions that make the procedure especially dangerous for some babies, and yet we STILL circumcised every baby.
Again, so no proofI guess I’d need to post proof that the Egyptians were originally black? Ethiopians? Europeans? Americans?
Besides you said they were white without proof.
Nope. If that’s the case then every surgery has complications so there’s no point of even bringing it up since ANY surgery can be botched.
I told you what I was protesting which was your bs reasonings. If you had left it at “I don’t want to mutilate myself” then I’d have nothing to say. But when you try to Juelz up some reasonings that amount to BS, I’mma call it out.
Thank God my parents circumcised me so I can be part of the covenant the Creator had with MY people