I believe OJ is guilty but why didnt the gloves fit?

Renzo

All Star
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
2,424
Reputation
400
Daps
7,814
Reppin
NULL
I was watching the long ass video that the dude who prosecuted Manson made on the case. He had me :patrice: when he mentioned that over 14 cops were there before Fuhrman and were still there when he got there. They only saw one glove and testified to that. He asked how and why would 14 people who mostly never met Fuhrman lie on the stand and risk commiting perjury/ruining their careers?

Also the dna contamination shyt that Cochran and the other dude ran was hilarious :mjlol: they sold the idea that the dna evidence could not be taken seriously because it was contaminated but even if it was contaminated...it would just not be readable, it wouldn't have magically turned into OJ Simpsons DNA :russ: the shyt worked though
It didnt magically turn into OJs DNA...his blood was taken and handed over to Detective Vannader who then proceeded to take iy back to the crime scene instead of immediately checking it in..when the vial was eventually checked in, blood was missing, thats all fact, the bloody sock was checked for blood twice...no blood found..3rd check,suddenly there is blood? Bullshyt...the blood on the back gate is another wtf as that area was checked and nothing was found..but 3 weeks later there is blood on the gate...One of OJ lawyers even produced a picture in court showing NO blood on that gate after the murders...the cop on the stand couldnt explain it away...and it was Fung who said the DNA evidence was ruined as it was placed in a hot ass van instead of a van with AC...the only evidence that links OJ was all discovered by Furhman save the socks...this case has too many inconsistencies..the glove was drenched in blood, so where was the blood that was on OJ? or bruises,cuts for that matter? Why would he ditch a glove on his property instead of ditching it along with the murder weapon and bloody clothing? Answer those facts and you will make me a "guilty" believer for life
 

SteelCitySoldier

TSC Fantasy Football Champion 2016
Joined
Sep 14, 2013
Messages
12,178
Reputation
2,652
Daps
27,793
Reppin
Los Angeles C.A.
The so called evidence was planted.

The son theory is illogical.


This is where y'all get it fukked up, SOME of the evidence was planted not all of it. The son was said to have bruises and shyt on him. OJ also contacted a lawyer and HIRED him for his son RIGHT AFTER THE MURDERS.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
1,392
Reputation
225
Daps
2,329
This is where y'all get it fukked up, SOME of the evidence was planted not all of it. The son was said to have bruises and shyt on him. OJ also contacted a lawyer and HIRED him for his son RIGHT AFTER THE MURDERS.

Any blood evidence connecting the son?

Who cares if he hired a lawyer for his kid. I would too. OJ was a c00n but he wasn't stupid.

Just like y'all concocting this dumb story of the son the LAPD would sure have gone after him as well.

It was a drug hit plain as a day.
 

SteelCitySoldier

TSC Fantasy Football Champion 2016
Joined
Sep 14, 2013
Messages
12,178
Reputation
2,652
Daps
27,793
Reppin
Los Angeles C.A.
Any blood evidence connecting the son?

Who cares if he hired a lawyer for his kid. I would too. OJ was a c00n but he wasn't stupid.

Just like y'all concocting this dumb story of the son the LAPD would sure have gone after him as well.

It was a drug hit plain as a day.


They didn't even bother to run his DNA once they ran with the theory that OJ was the only suspect.

Its not a story concocted by us, it's a theory that has been out there by plenty of people. Take a look at this if you care to see why this is a theory:


The O.J. Simpson Saga Began 20 Years Ago Today — Here's Why His Son Should Be A Suspect

I believe this more than any other theory out there. I ain't saying that I'm right just saying that there is a whole lot of evidence that points to him.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
1,392
Reputation
225
Daps
2,329
They didn't even bother to run his DNA once they ran with the theory that OJ was the only suspect.

Its not a story concocted by us, it's a theory that has been out there by plenty of people. Take a look at this if you care to see why this is a theory:


The O.J. Simpson Saga Began 20 Years Ago Today — Here's Why His Son Should Be A Suspect

I believe this more than any other theory out there. I ain't saying that I'm right just saying that there is a whole lot of evidence that points to him.

And I think it' an absurd theory considering Ron and Nicole's drug ties.
 

Luxury Tax

Middleman Money
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
2,532
Reputation
880
Daps
8,442
Reppin
Bay Area
There's no evidence that points in Jason's direction just more white folks speculation.

The Mark Furhman aspect appears more plausible than Jason but the average redneck honkey mind can't fathom that.

All of this OJ did it rhetoric easily gets destroyed with the truth.
 
Top