Fair argument, but I don't know if Rob Gronkowski's the best example we could be using for this. While Gronk definitely comes off as a fun-loving doofus, he's not really doing anything that's detrimental to the team, breaking the law, or coming off as arrogant.
He's also doing it while producing at an elite-level and being the best tight-end in the league. To be fair, I think a guy like Tony Gonzalez, Jimmy Graham, or Gates (when he was playing at an elite level) could get away with the same things that Gronk does without harsher criticism (if they were all young & single...because I'm sure Gonzo's married w/ kids)
When you think about it, being an elite player & winning a lot (
consistently) seems to be the best insurance against criticism regardless of color.
If he ever throws his QB under the bus like T.O., admits to "playing hard when he wants to" like Moss, rocks a Hall of Fame jacket during a game like Chad, gets arrested like my entire hometown team, kicks his mother's ass like Dez, gets caught up in the strip club like Pacman, fights dogs like Vick, or just starts costing his team with penalties & shyt then maybe we could have a better argument).
One great point that other people have brought up is that playing for the Patriots definitely protects him b/c he doesn't have a lot of opportunities to hang himself with sound-bytes. :belipetraeus:
A better argument could be Jay Cutler Vs. Cam Newton. You guys could go back and forth all day with those two.
Right now, Gronk is like football's less attention-whoring version of Dwight Howard (the Orlando version: A big goof with great stats that hasn't hurt anyone yet.