How will Joe Biden GOVERN? General Biden Administration F**kery Thread

Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
17,054
Reputation
5,189
Daps
114,604
So is the Afghan withdrawal going to be the first Biden foreign policy disaster? That seems to be how its being portrayed?
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
45,751
Reputation
6,880
Daps
145,858
Reppin
CookoutGang
So is the Afghan withdrawal going to be the first Biden foreign policy disaster? That seems to be how its being portrayed?
All I see is a bunch of George Bush and Co complaining about it.

Biden just following through with what the previous administration set in motion and many folks were cheering on. :unimpressed:
 

Schmoove

All Star
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
5,243
Reputation
276
Daps
6,355
Really shows how performative and fake this is. We waged war during the Civil War. Yet can't break a filibuster, and you want to compare this to THAT?
:mjlol:

I don't even think nuking the filibuster is a great idea but in the context of Biden's speech, if he is unwilling to do it why does anything he said matter. It doesn't. In terms of my views though...while I'm not opposed to breaking the filibuster I think people are being sold a bill of goods on this. Republicans will win back the senate one day. And they'll have 51 votes to shyt can whatever voting rights democrats pass. Not to mention the Supreme Court. All of this distracts from the real problem: the only solution is local on the state level. You need to win governor seats, and have enough seats in state senates+houses to pass voting rights bills. Because clearly a federal law is going to be destroyed - either by senate republicans in the short term, or the Supreme Court in the long term.

They're going to carve out constitutional rights from the filibuster just like budget items and court nominations were.

And yes, a full abolition of the filibuster is begging for trouble. 18% of the country elects 52 Senators. Democrats won't hold a supermajority by being a super-progressive party.
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
51,754
Reputation
18,812
Daps
281,869
They're going to carve out constitutional rights from the filibuster just like budget items and court nominations were.

And yes, a full abolition of the filibuster is begging for trouble. 18% of the country elects 52 Senators. Democrats won't hold a supermajority by being a super-progressive party.
Even if they do this we’re left with a situation where potentially every two years, voting rights are gained or lost via 51 votes. That’s not sustainable. There is no downside for republicans getting rid of “government control of elections” by eliminating this when they take over. Sure democrats can re-instate it next time they take over but how is this good policy? I don’t think people thought this through.
 
Top