US Government has been the the largest purveyor of "disinformation" for the past century, I very much welcome this "global reckoning". I bet a lot of countries are going to have a lot to say.
I thought this dude was going to be criminally prosecuted in Michigan?
The traditional the-truth-is-somewhere-in-the-middle approach will no longer do, Clinton argues.
“They’ve got to rid themselves of both-sidesism,” she says. “It is not the same to say something critical of somebody on the other side of the aisle and to instigate an attack on the Capitol and to vote against certifying the election. Those are not comparable, and it goes back to the problem of the press actually coming to grips with how out of bounds and dangerous the new political philosophy on the right happens to be.”
The press cannot be expected to restore a common baseline of truth on its own, however.
“The technology platforms are so much more powerful than any organ of the so-called mainstream press, and I do think that there has to be not just an American reckoning but a global reckoning with the disinformation, with the monopolistic power and control, with the lack of accountability that the platforms currently enjoy,” Clinton said.
US Government has been the the largest purveyor of "disinformation" for the past century, I very much welcome this "global reckoning". I bet a lot of countries are going to have a lot to say.
You’re punching thin air, man. It’s obvious you’re looking for an internet fight to spice up your day, but I am not the droid you’re looking for. Also, you’re confused if you think what I said amounts to whatsboutism. Quite to the contrary, I advocated for a full and comprehensive discussion about disinformation how it’s been weaponized by international actors in fomenting political unrest and disorder across the world. Can you say the same? Or were you just shytposting because you were bored on a Saturday?whataboutism?
Is American disinformation why you spent years eating DJT’s ass?