How many memorable games have Melo had since becoming a Knick?

[ThaBronxBully]

you don't get what im trying to explain to you bruh

your knicks team is not going anywhere right now and for the foreseeable future. your ass would rather be mediocre get beat in the 1st round rather try something different.

You better than Boston? no! Philly? no! Chicago? no! Indy? no! Miami? no! Brooklyn? no!

Trying Something "Different" Was Saying "Hey Lets Bring In One Of The Most Skilled Scoring Threats In The NBA Today Rather Then Keeping Danillo Gallinari"

As Far As Being "Better" Then The Teams You Mentioned, Lets Some Games Actually Be Played Before You Actually Judge Cuz You Sound Like A Meathead Right Now

 

[ghostwriterx]

this one and a few others where he hit the game winner or had some clutch baskets down the stretch

I cant count games where he beasted and they lost as "memorable" games, I dont see how anyone can

What type of logic is this?

Michael Jordan's 63 points in 1986 NBA Playoffs may have been greatest game ever played | THE OFFICIAL SITE OF THE CHICAGO BULLS

Yeah, nothing memorable about that...

 

[ghostwriterx]

you don't get what im trying to explain to you bruh

your knicks team is not going anywhere right now and for the foreseeable future. your ass would rather be mediocre get beat in the 1st round rather try something different.

You better than Boston? no! Philly? no! Chicago? no! Indy? no! Miami? no! Brooklyn? no!

While all of the above is true, it has more to do w/Stat than Melo.

 

[Pack2]

What type of logic is this?

Michael Jordan's 63 points in 1986 NBA Playoffs may have been greatest game ever played | THE OFFICIAL SITE OF THE CHICAGO BULLS

Yeah, nothing memorable about that...

So you use the most points ever scored in a playoff game vs a dynasty and eventual champion as the example to use up against a 42 point effort against an aging team that didnt win shyt that year?

AND used an article with the title "may have been greatest game ever played" coming from the official Chicago Bulls website??

63 against Boston in 86....still an NBA record = memorable
42 against Boston in 11 = memorable to knicks fans only

 

[ghostwriterx]

So you use the most points ever scored in a playoff game vs a dynasty and eventual champion as the example to use up against a 42 point effort against an aging team that didnt win shyt that year?

AND used an article with the title "may have been greatest game ever played" coming from the official Chicago Bulls website??

63 against Boston in 86....still an NBA record = memorable
42 against Boston in 11 = memorable to knicks fans only

I'm just taking issue w/your ridiculous assertion that a performance is only memorable if the player won the game, but keep adding these qualifiers to try to justify your puzzling statement.

 

[AVXL]

AVXL needs to change his name to Brother P-Touch.

He stays labeling.

Add me to the list of Non-Knicks fans.

A Reb post without a contrived, media driven overreaction? Stop the presses!!!

There's gotta be an agenda somewhere in your post, just gotta be

 

[NYC Rebel]

A Reb post without a contrived, media driven overreaction? Stop the presses!!!

There's gotta be an agenda somewhere in your post, just gotta be

Post it.

I know you have me in your favorites folder somewhere.

 

[Pack2]

I'm just taking issue w/your ridiculous assertion that a performance is only memorable if the player won the game, but keep adding these qualifiers to try to justify your puzzling statement.

If it's not a historic performance, then the loss is only memorable to the fanbase of the team...I dont consider that Melo performance a historic performance...

 

[ghostwriterx]

If it's not a historic performance, then the loss is only memorable to the fanbase of the team...I dont consider that Melo performance a historic performance...

So only historical losing performances are memorable?



Regardless, pretty sure the thread title had no such qualifier.