I hate this argument because some of the smartest MCs know how to appeal to emotions and THAT is what a great lyricist is to me. Saying a bunch of metaphors and and rhyming syllables is great, but the average person isn’t listening to music to solve puzzles, they’re listening to feel something… joy, anger, relief, love, etc.
I don't disagree.
The definition of lyricism, typically agreed upon, is that of
wordplay.
You're basically positing a different definition of lyricism within the typical discourse of hip hop discussions.
If that's the metric of lyricism, how much it evokes emotions in the listener, then Tupac is the greatest of all time.
If we switch to that type of scale, Thought fails there too.
How do I judge that?
When you look at a Tupac, or arguably an Andre 3000 (I think he straddles the line, but what made him into an icon is his emo stuff), - they have a body of work that Thought just doesn't have.
He just never had the type of records that could reach people (Blame Quest Love!)
He rarely ever had the beats. (Blame Quest Love)
And when he does, he for whatever reason, doesn't really get the folks to vibe with him like that.
If anything, him and the roots, and the rest of "nerd hop", makes music for earbuds, they make album type music, not really hit single, club jams type music.
As for what the average person cares about in terms of music - you can hear what they like on the radio and in the clubs.
You can hear what they rap along to when the dj drops out the vocals. That's not this crowd, and we're not presently having that discussion.