How can so called fans be Anti for a company founded by Wrestlers?

Cal Cutta

Balthazar
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
1,246
Reputation
447
Daps
3,890
Reppin
NULL
Why do dudes always try to reach beyond the focal point of the topic? :snoop:

I never said you had to like it. It’s just dumb to hate on a fed started by wrestlers that gives talent a chance to shine and be a legit alternative.

AEW isn’t CZW, just like AEW isn’t ROH or MLW. You don’t see “fans” shytting on ROH or NJPW for being alternatives. But here comes AEW, a fed on a bigger platform than those other companies, and suddenly marks start to hate on it.

Did TNA/Impact get the same treatment AEW got when they were in their prime on Spike? (Serious question since I was out of the scene during that time.)

Stooges are just shook AEW has a chance to be legit competition and they’re :umad:

Your thread title *literally* says "How can so called fans be Anti for a company founded by wrestlers". That is not saying "its dumb to hate", that is legitimately implying that you can't hold any kind of less-than-positive opinion for a company founded by wrestlers. These are your words! You should have just not hid your hands and made it clear you're talking about AEW. Frankly I think your entire thread premise is disingenuous and now you're getting to your real opinion.

Also, you are making a whole lot of assumptions about people's reactions to AEW and why they have them. Save your energy, think for yourself, and allow others to do the same.

Tell me where I've demonstrated being a "stooge" and why. I promise your argument will have more holes in it than swiss cheese.

Finally, since when what Tony Khan a wrestler?

Having an agenda when it comes to wrestling fandom is so fukking idiotic.
 

MenacingMonk

Tranquilo
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
62,364
Reputation
7,958
Daps
135,973
Reppin
West where the Sunsets
Your thread title *literally* says "How can so called fans be Anti for a company founded by wrestlers". That is not saying "its dumb to hate", that is legitimately implying that you can't hold any kind of less-than-positive opinion for a company founded by wrestlers. These are your words! You should have just not hid your hands and made it clear you're talking about AEW. Frankly I think your entire thread premise is disingenuous and now you're getting to your real opinion.

Also, you are making a whole lot of assumptions about people's reactions to AEW and why they have them. Save your energy, think for yourself, and allow others to do the same.

Tell me where I've demonstrated being a "stooge" and why. I promise your argument will have more holes in it than swiss cheese.

Finally, since when what Tony Khan a wrestler?

Having an agenda when it comes to wrestling fandom is so fukking idiotic.
Dude, it’s implied I’m talking about AEW because I brought up the 4 talents that MADE AEW happen and I’ve brought up every thing related to AEW. :dahell:

TK didn’t start AEW; he’s the money behind the operation. He helped build AEW, but it wouldn’t have happened if those 4 wrestlers didnt put together a big independent show (All In) that did great. :what:

NOTHING is safe from opinions. I’ve criticized AEW’s bad moves, just like I’ve done with the E and every other thing I found stupid; whether it be in entertainment or personal life. But there’s a difference between voicing opinions with an open mind and just flat out hate. :unimpressed:

There is no agenda when I’ve been up front. And I never called you a stooge. Seems like you labeled yourself that. :patrice:
 

Max.

Banned
WOAT
Joined
Jun 23, 2015
Messages
33,993
Reputation
3,196
Daps
102,358
:mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol:

Remember these white boys got the aew stinks thread moved bcuz it showed how stupid/weekly botches



look how corny these guys look :hhh:
 

Cal Cutta

Balthazar
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
1,246
Reputation
447
Daps
3,890
Reppin
NULL
There is no agenda when I’ve been up front. And I never called you a stooge. Seems like you labeled yourself that. :patrice:

You replied to me when you brought up the word "stooges". You weren't talking to anyone else, you were talking to me. And I've only been talking to you, no one else. So I reiterate, where I was a stooge? We both know it's a bullshyt claim so let's just put that out there.

And yes, Cody Rhodes made the first move with a tweet (an awesome move, all told). But that is a damn long way from starting a full promotion. And if you're going to use All In, then what about ROH's critical part of that show? That show doesn't happen without ROH's resources. So between ROH and Tony Khan's financing, those are just as critical to the birth of AEW as anything from Cody Rhodes, Kenny Omega, or the Young Bucks.

Full disclosure: I am not a fan of the current AEW content. There are a lot of elements of AEW that turn me away. My major example, Excalibur made me turn off Double or Nothing in minutes because I found him insufferable. Any AEW clip I've seen with him on commentary since, same reaction. But on the flipside, Jonathan Coachman did the *exact* same thing to me when he was on WWE. So it's not a brand-issue with me, it's a personnel issue.

I don't assume my issues with AEW will last forever. And I don't advertise my opinions on AEW that often either. In the grand scheme of things, AEW is new and has a lot of growth potential. So I am optimistic they will get into a groove and have a lot of content I will want to watch. What that is, I have no idea. I don't think it's going to be Punk or Bryan Danielson. I am guessing it will be a new discovery that will be impossible to ignore. But yeah, for me, they are not there yet. And a lot of their current content makes me cringe.
 

MenacingMonk

Tranquilo
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
62,364
Reputation
7,958
Daps
135,973
Reppin
West where the Sunsets
You replied to me when you brought up the word "stooges". You weren't talking to anyone else, you were talking to me. And I've only been talking to you, no one else. So I reiterate, where I was a stooge? We both know it's a bullshyt claim so let's just put that out there.

And yes, Cody Rhodes made the first move with a tweet (an awesome move, all told). But that is a damn long way from starting a full promotion. And if you're going to use All In, then what about ROH's critical part of that show? That show doesn't happen without ROH's resources. So between ROH and Tony Khan's financing, those are just as critical to the birth of AEW as anything from Cody Rhodes, Kenny Omega, or the Young Bucks.

Full disclosure: I am not a fan of the current AEW content. There are a lot of elements of AEW that turn me away. My major example, Excalibur made me turn off Double or Nothing in minutes because I found him insufferable. Any AEW clip I've seen with him on commentary since, same reaction. But on the flipside, Jonathan Coachman did the *exact* same thing to me when he was on WWE. So it's not a brand-issue with me, it's a personnel issue.

I don't assume my issues with AEW will last forever. And I don't advertise my opinions on AEW that often either. In the grand scheme of things, AEW is new and has a lot of growth potential. So I am optimistic they will get into a groove and have a lot of content I will want to watch. What that is, I have no idea. I don't think it's going to be Punk or Bryan Danielson. I am guessing it will be a new discovery that will be impossible to ignore. But yeah, for me, they are not there yet. And a lot of their current content makes me cringe.
I ain’t reading that shyt, but the fact you think I labeled you a stooge has me :dead: since I didn’t take your reply as being anti AEW and that last sentence I wrote was referring to the usual Stooges who have a hate hard-on for AEDub. In fact, I don’t think I’ve seen a reply from you being anti AEW and this is our first back and forth regarding them. :skip:
 

Cal Cutta

Balthazar
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
1,246
Reputation
447
Daps
3,890
Reppin
NULL
I ain’t reading that shyt, but the fact you think I labeled you a stooge has me :dead: since I didn’t take your reply as being anti AEW and that last sentence I wrote was referring to the usual Stooges who have a hate hard-on for AEDub. :skip:

Alright you're a p*ssy who's afraid to engage. I think you're the stooge here, fukking dumbass mark.
 

CBoz

We Are NXT!
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
56,796
Reputation
3,278
Daps
128,150
Reppin
The NXT Universe
Look at this juelzing. :scust:

You know damn well I was talking about things people watch or don’t watch. How does the Arena/Vince thing even fit there? :dahell:

Your trying to spin shyt so you don’t look like a dumbass. Too late. :mjlol:

Let people bash who they want to. Don't tell others what they can and can't do. Just ignore them if it makes you that upset.
 

Cal Cutta

Balthazar
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
1,246
Reputation
447
Daps
3,890
Reppin
NULL
Let people bash who they want to. Don't tell others what they can and can't do. Just ignore them if it makes you that upset.

The OP is legit trying to spin his agenda by claiming others have an agenda. Both a p*ssy, a dumbass, and a hypocrite. An opinion worth dogshyt.
 

Cal Cutta

Balthazar
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
1,246
Reputation
447
Daps
3,890
Reppin
NULL
Fuxkin mark writing essays over his stoogeism. :mjlol:

I don't assume my issues with AEW will last forever. And I don't advertise my opinions on AEW that often either. In the grand scheme of things, AEW is new and has a lot of growth potential. So I am optimistic they will get into a groove and have a lot of content I will want to watch. What that is, I have no idea. I don't think it's going to be Punk or Bryan Danielson. I am guessing it will be a new discovery that will be impossible to ignore. But yeah, for me, they are not there yet. And a lot of their current content makes me cringe.

Seeing as your remedial ass hates reading, I cut it down to just the part you'll want to see.
 
Top